Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sensory Organs, Division of Complex Operating Unit of Dentistry, "Aldo Moro" University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Dec;10(6):e70013. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70013.
One of the primary objectives in endodontics is to achieve thorough cleaning and disinfection of the root canal system during an endodontic procedure. This aims to reduce microbial contamination and prevent the development of endodontic lesions. To attain this goal, it is imperative to establish access to the endodontic space that allows for the complete removal of pulp tissue and the accurate identification of canal orifices while preserving the anatomical integrity of the root floor and pulp chamber as much as possible. In this scoping review, we aim to explore aspects related to the identification of canal orifices and the presence of pulp debris and residues during endodontic treatment. Specifically, we aim to assess whether and to what extent the design of the access cavity impacts these factors.
The scoping review was conducted and prepared following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews [PRISMA-ScR]).
The search yielded a total of 3697 bibliographic sources. After eliminating duplicates and applying eligibility criteria, only 10 studies were included.
In conclusion, our review, conducted following PRISMA guidelines, includes 10 studies and suggests a potential trend: conservative techniques may generate more debris, whereas guided techniques exhibit superior precision in locating canal openings.
牙髓学的主要目标之一是在牙髓治疗过程中彻底清洁和消毒根管系统。这旨在减少微生物污染并防止牙髓病变的发展。为了实现这一目标,必须建立进入牙髓空间的通道,以便尽可能完整地清除牙髓组织,并准确识别根管口,同时尽可能保持根管底部和牙髓室的解剖完整性。在本次范围综述中,我们旨在探讨与根管口识别以及牙髓碎片和残留物在牙髓治疗期间的存在相关的方面。具体而言,我们旨在评估进入腔的设计是否以及在何种程度上影响这些因素。
本范围综述按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南(PRISMA 扩展用于范围综述 [PRISMA-ScR])进行了综述和准备。
搜索共产生了 3697 个书目来源。在消除重复项并应用入选标准后,仅纳入了 10 项研究。
总之,我们按照 PRISMA 指南进行的综述包括 10 项研究,并提出了一个潜在趋势:保守技术可能会产生更多的碎片,而引导技术在定位根管开口方面具有更高的精度。