• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意容量对虚拟现实驾驶模拟器的运动适应很重要。

Attentional capacity matters for visuomotor adaptation to a virtual reality driving simulator.

机构信息

Laboratoire Perceptions, Interactions, Comportements and Simulations des usagers de la route, COSYS-PICS-L, Université Gustave Eiffel, 14-20 Boulevard Newton, Cité Descartes Champs sur Marne, 77454, Marne la Vallée Cedex 2, France.

Département Neurosciences et Sciences Cognitives, Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Brétigny-sur-Orge, France.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 22;14(1):28991. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79392-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-79392-1
PMID:39578563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11584864/
Abstract

Studies have shown that adaptation to a virtual reality driving simulator takes time and that individuals differ widely in the time they need to adapt. The present study examined the relationship between attentional capacity and driving-simulator adaptation, with the hypothesis that individuals with better attentional capacity would exhibit more efficient adaptation to novel virtual driving circumstances. To this end, participants were asked to steer in a driving simulator through a series of 100 bends while keeping within a central demarcated zone. Adaptation was assessed from changes in steering behavior (steering performance: time spent within the zone, steering stability, steering reversal rate) over the course of the bends. Attentional capacity was assessed with two dynamic visual attention tasks (Multiple Object Tracking, MOT; Multiple Object Avoidance, MOA). Results showed effective adaptation to the simulator with repetition, as all steering-behavior variables improved. Both MOT and MOA scores significantly predicted adaptation, with MOT being a stronger predictor. Further analyses revealed that higher-capacity participants, but not their lower-capacity counterparts, produced more low-amplitude steering-wheel corrections early in the task, resulting in finer vehicle control and better performance later on. These findings provide new insights into adaptation to virtual reality simulators through the lens of attentional capacity.

摘要

研究表明,适应虚拟现实驾驶模拟器需要时间,并且个体在适应所需的时间上存在很大差异。本研究考察了注意力容量与驾驶模拟器适应之间的关系,假设具有更好注意力容量的个体将表现出更有效的适应新的虚拟驾驶环境。为此,要求参与者在驾驶模拟器中通过一系列 100 个弯道,同时保持在中央划定的区域内。通过在弯道过程中转向行为(转向性能:区域内花费的时间、转向稳定性、转向反转率)的变化来评估适应情况。注意力容量通过两个动态视觉注意力任务(多目标跟踪,MOT;多目标回避,MOA)进行评估。结果表明,随着重复的进行,对模拟器的适应有效,所有转向行为变量都得到了改善。MOT 和 MOA 分数都显著预测了适应,其中 MOT 的预测能力更强。进一步的分析表明,高能力的参与者,而不是低能力的参与者,在任务的早期阶段产生更多低幅度的方向盘修正,从而在后期实现更精细的车辆控制和更好的性能。这些发现通过注意力容量的视角为虚拟现实模拟器的适应提供了新的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29ae/11584864/04f4ef541f57/41598_2024_79392_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29ae/11584864/905b53656c69/41598_2024_79392_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29ae/11584864/c75cdf00b419/41598_2024_79392_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29ae/11584864/7b08080a54a1/41598_2024_79392_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29ae/11584864/04f4ef541f57/41598_2024_79392_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29ae/11584864/905b53656c69/41598_2024_79392_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29ae/11584864/c75cdf00b419/41598_2024_79392_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29ae/11584864/7b08080a54a1/41598_2024_79392_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29ae/11584864/04f4ef541f57/41598_2024_79392_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Attentional capacity matters for visuomotor adaptation to a virtual reality driving simulator.注意容量对虚拟现实驾驶模拟器的运动适应很重要。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 22;14(1):28991. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79392-1.
2
Steering Control in a Low-Cost Driving Simulator: A Case for the Role of Virtual Vehicle Cab.低成本驾驶模拟器中的转向控制:虚拟车辆驾驶室的作用案例。
Hum Factors. 2018 Aug;60(5):719-734. doi: 10.1177/0018720818769253. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
3
Evidence of attentional impairments using virtual driving simulation in multiple sclerosis.使用虚拟驾驶模拟在多发性硬化症中注意力损伤的证据。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Oct;25:251-257. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
4
Electrophysiological correlates of attentional monitoring during a complex driving simulation task.注意监测在复杂驾驶模拟任务中的电生理相关性。
Biol Psychol. 2020 Jul;154:107918. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107918. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
5
Driving with central field loss III: vehicle control.中心视野缺损情况下的驾驶 III:车辆操控
Clin Exp Optom. 2016 Sep;99(5):435-40. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12432. Epub 2016 Jul 24.
6
When virtuality becomes real: Relevance of mental abilities and age in simulator adaptation and dropouts.当虚拟成为现实:心理能力和年龄在模拟器适应和辍学中的相关性。
Ergonomics. 2020 Oct;63(10):1271-1280. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1778095. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
7
Identifying cognitive distraction using steering wheel reversal rates.使用方向盘反转率识别认知分心。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Nov;96:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.032. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
8
Does haptic steering guidance instigate speeding? A driving simulator study into causes and remedies.触觉转向引导会引发超速吗?一项关于原因及补救措施的驾驶模拟器研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jan;98:372-387. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.10.016. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
9
Relationships between driving simulator performance and driving test results.驾驶模拟器性能与驾驶测试结果之间的关系。
Ergonomics. 2009 Feb;52(2):137-53. doi: 10.1080/00140130802277521.
10
Eye movements in real and simulated driving and navigation control - Foreword to the Special Issue.真实与模拟驾驶及导航控制中的眼球运动——特刊前言
J Eye Mov Res. 2021 Jun 3;12(3). doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.3.0.

本文引用的文献

1
Increased cognitive load in immersive virtual reality during visuomotor adaptation is associated with decreased long-term retention and context transfer.在视动适应过程中,沉浸式虚拟现实会增加认知负荷,这与长期保持和情景转移的能力下降有关。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Oct 5;19(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01084-6.
2
The Multiple Object Avoidance (MOA) task measures attention for action: Evidence from driving and sport.多目标回避(MOA)任务衡量的是行动注意力:来自驾驶和运动的证据。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Jun;54(3):1508-1529. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01679-2. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
3
A critical systematic review of the Neurotracker perceptual-cognitive training tool.
神经追踪器感知认知训练工具的关键性系统评价
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Oct;28(5):1458-1483. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01892-2. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
4
Dynamic visual attention characteristics and their relationship to match performance in skilled basketball players.熟练篮球运动员的动态视觉注意力特征及其与比赛表现的关系。
PeerJ. 2020 Aug 19;8:e9803. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9803. eCollection 2020.
5
When virtuality becomes real: Relevance of mental abilities and age in simulator adaptation and dropouts.当虚拟成为现实:心理能力和年龄在模拟器适应和辍学中的相关性。
Ergonomics. 2020 Oct;63(10):1271-1280. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1778095. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
6
Exploring to learn and learning to explore.探索以学习,学习以探索。
Psychol Res. 2021 Jun;85(4):1367-1379. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01352-x. Epub 2020 May 10.
7
Eye Behavior During Multiple Object Tracking and Multiple Identity Tracking.多目标跟踪和多身份跟踪过程中的眼部行为
Vision (Basel). 2019 Jul 31;3(3):37. doi: 10.3390/vision3030037.
8
Getting Back Into the Loop: The Perceptual-Motor Determinants of Successful Transitions out of Automated Driving.重新进入循环:成功脱离自动驾驶的感知运动决定因素。
Hum Factors. 2019 Nov;61(7):1037-1065. doi: 10.1177/0018720819829594. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
9
Driving simulator scenarios and measures to faithfully evaluate risky driving behavior: A comparative study of different driver age groups.驾驶模拟器场景及忠实评估危险驾驶行为的措施:不同年龄组驾驶员的比较研究
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 10;12(10):e0185909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185909. eCollection 2017.
10
Visuomotor adaptation in head-mounted virtual reality versus conventional training.头戴式虚拟现实与传统训练中的视动适应比较。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 4;7:45469. doi: 10.1038/srep45469.