Kumar Aashish, Iqbal Umer, Amin Shafin Bin, Arsal Syed Ali, Ali Syed Muhammad Sinaan, Shafique Muhammad Ashir, Shahid Muhammad Saad, Naz Aimen, Asuka Emediong Santhus
Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College, Lyari Hospital Rd., Rangiwara Karachi, Karachi, 75010, Pakistan.
Liaquat National Hospital & Medical College, Stadium Road, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Feb;81(2):203-216. doi: 10.1007/s00228-024-03778-3. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
Patients with heart failure and concomitant renal impairment are often prescribed loop diuretics, such as furosemide, as the primary treatment. The present meta-analysis is focused on analyzing the safety and efficacy of the implementation of tolvaptan as a novel approach in patients with renal impairment and heart failure.
Two reviewers conducted a screening of articles using online databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase. Following a comprehensive literature search, seven articles that met all inclusion criteria (patients with heart failure and renal impairment) were selected for analysis. Subsequently, various primary and secondary outcomes were evaluated.
The primary outcomes of our study included urine volume, worsening renal function, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels, and creatinine levels. Tolvaptan demonstrated superior efficacy in increasing urine output with a standardized mean difference of 2.18 (95% CI 0.62-3.75, p = 0.006) and resulted in a lower incidence of worsening renal function with odds ratio 0.41 (95% CI 0.22-0.77, p = 0.006). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the tolvaptan and conventional treatment groups in changing serum creatinine levels with a standardized mean difference of - 0.37 (95% CI - 0.86 to 0.12, p = 0.135), but tolvaptan tends to decrease blood urea nitrogen levels with a standardized mean difference - 0.18 (95% CI - 0.30 to - 0.06, p = 0.004) in comparison to conventional treatment group.
While tolvaptan administration was related to better renal outcomes, unresolved heterogeneities and various factors could have influenced our findings. Further research is needed to evaluate the role of tolvaptan in the treatment of this patient population.
心力衰竭合并肾功能损害的患者常被处方使用袢利尿剂,如呋塞米,作为主要治疗方法。本荟萃分析的重点是分析使用托伐普坦作为一种新方法治疗肾功能损害合并心力衰竭患者的安全性和有效性。
两名评审员使用在线数据库(包括PubMed、谷歌学术和Embase)对文章进行筛选。在全面的文献检索之后,选择了七篇符合所有纳入标准(心力衰竭合并肾功能损害患者)的文章进行分析。随后,对各种主要和次要结局进行了评估。
我们研究的主要结局包括尿量、肾功能恶化、血尿素氮(BUN)水平和肌酐水平。托伐普坦在增加尿量方面显示出卓越的疗效,标准化平均差为2.18(95%CI 0.62 - 3.75,p = 0.006),并且导致肾功能恶化的发生率较低,比值比为0.41(95%CI 0.22 - 0.77,p = 0.006)。此外,托伐普坦组和传统治疗组在血清肌酐水平变化方面没有显著差异,标准化平均差为 -0.37(95%CI -0.86至0.12,p = 0.135),但与传统治疗组相比,托伐普坦倾向于降低血尿素氮水平,标准化平均差为 -0.18(95%CI -0.30至 -0.06,p = 0.004)。
虽然托伐普坦的使用与更好的肾脏结局相关,但未解决的异质性和各种因素可能影响了我们的研究结果。需要进一步研究来评估托伐普坦在治疗这一患者群体中的作用。