Renal and Transplantation Unit, St George's University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Cardiology Clinical Academic Group, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St Georges, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Jul;16(7):1131-1139. doi: 10.2215/CJN.14180920. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
CKD is common in patients with heart failure, associated with high mortality and morbidity, which is even higher in people undergoing long-term dialysis. Despite increasing use of evidence-based drug and device therapy in patients with heart failure in the general population, patients with CKD have not benefitted. This review discusses prevalence and evidence of kidney replacement, device, and drug therapies for heart failure in CKD. Evidence for treatment with -blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, and sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors in mild-to-moderate CKD has emerged from general population studies in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). -Blockers have been shown to improve outcomes in patients with HFrEF in all stages of CKD, including patients on dialysis. However, studies of HFrEF selected patients with creatinine <2.5 mg/dl for ACE inhibitors, <3.0 mg/dl for angiotensin-receptor blockers, and <2.5 mg/dl for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, excluding patients with severe CKD. Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor therapy was successfully used in randomized trials in patients with eGFR as low as 20 ml/min per 1.73 m Hence, the benefits of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis inhibitor therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate CKD have been demonstrated, yet such therapy is not used in all suitable patients because of fear of hyperkalemia and worsening kidney function. Sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitor therapy improved mortality and hospitalization in patients with HFrEF and CKD stages 3 and 4 (eGFR>20 ml/min per 1.73 m). High-dose and combination diuretic therapy, often necessary, may be complicated with worsening kidney function and electrolyte imbalances, but has been used successfully in patients with CKD stages 3 and 4. Intravenous iron improved symptoms in patients with heart failure and CKD stage 3; and high-dose iron reduced heart failure hospitalizations by 44% in patients on dialysis. Cardiac resynchronization therapy reduced death and hospitalizations in patients with heart failure and CKD stage 3. Peritoneal dialysis in patients with symptomatic fluid overload improved symptoms and prevented hospital admissions. Evidence suggests that combined cardiology-nephrology clinics may help improve management of patients with HFrEF and CKD. A multidisciplinary approach may be necessary for implementation of evidence-based therapy.
慢性肾脏病(CKD)在心力衰竭患者中很常见,与高死亡率和发病率相关,在接受长期透析的患者中甚至更高。尽管在一般人群中心力衰竭患者越来越多地使用基于证据的药物和设备治疗,但 CKD 患者并未从中受益。本文讨论了 CKD 患者心力衰竭的肾脏替代、设备和药物治疗的患病率和证据。在射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者中,从一般人群的研究中获得了在轻度至中度 CKD 患者中使用β受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂、血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂和钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白抑制剂治疗的证据。β受体阻滞剂已被证明可改善所有 CKD 阶段(包括透析患者)HFrEF 患者的结局。然而,HFrEF 研究选择了肌酐<2.5 mg/dl 的 ACE 抑制剂、<3.0 mg/dl 的血管紧张素受体阻滞剂和<2.5 mg/dl 的盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂的患者,排除了严重 CKD 患者。血管紧张素受体脑啡肽酶抑制剂治疗在 eGFR 低至 20 ml/min/1.73 m 的随机试验中成功应用。因此,已经证明了在轻度至中度 CKD 患者中使用肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮轴抑制剂治疗的益处,但由于担心高钾血症和肾功能恶化,并非所有合适的患者都使用这种治疗。钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白抑制剂治疗改善了 HFrEF 和 CKD 3 期和 4 期(eGFR>20 ml/min/1.73 m)患者的死亡率和住院率。高剂量和联合利尿剂治疗,通常是必要的,可能会使肾功能恶化和电解质失衡复杂化,但在 CKD 3 期和 4 期患者中已成功使用。静脉铁剂改善了心力衰竭和 CKD 3 期患者的症状;在透析患者中,高剂量铁剂使心力衰竭住院率降低了 44%。心脏再同步治疗降低了心力衰竭和 CKD 3 期患者的死亡率和住院率。腹膜透析可改善有症状液体超负荷的患者的症状并预防住院。有证据表明,心内科-肾病科联合诊所可能有助于改善射血分数降低的心力衰竭和 CKD 患者的管理。可能需要多学科方法来实施基于证据的治疗。