Nelson Meredith A, Schmitt Lauren M, Horn Paul S, Berry-Kravis Elizabeth, Hessl David, Shaffer Rebecca C, Carpenter Randall, Budimirovic Dejan B, Wang Paul, Reisinger Debra L, Walton-Bowen Karen, Erickson Craig A
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, USA.
Department of Pediatrics , University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Nov 23. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06634-6.
Estimating meaningful change thresholds (MCT) on clinical outcome assessments is an important consideration when evaluating treatments. In fragile X syndrome (FXS) research, there has been no consensus on how to define MCT's on several commonly used outcome measures. The purpose of the current study was to determine clinically relevant MCT's of caregiver-rated assessments using data from a phase 3 clinical trials of arbaclofen (Berry-Kravis et al., 2017). Data were collected as a part of previous phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of arbaclofen in individuals with FXS (Berry-Kravis et al., 2017). The two studies enrolled age groups of 5-11-years (n = 159) and 12-50-years (n = 119). The current study examines meaningful within-patient change thresholds from baseline to treatment week 8 across several measures: ABC-C; PSI; Vineland-II; and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of Anxiety and Disruptive Behaviors. MCT's were established by using anchor-based methods, using the CGI-S and CGI-I as anchors. Examining the results of the anchor-based analyses and visual CDF plots, MCT's were observed for the pediatric study for the ABC-C subscales (with a range depending on use of CGI-S or CGI-I as anchor): Irritability: 11.1-14.8 points; Hyperactivity: 6.7-8.9 points; and Socially Unresponsive/Lethargic: 6.6-8.1 points; as well both VAS subscales: Anxiety: 28.3-36.2 mm; and Disruptive Behavior: 22.4-27.4 mm. Such thresholds were not observed for the Vineland-II and PSI subscales. Our analysis of MCT's helps set the stage for interpreting clinical trial results in FXS. This may include use of relevant subscales of the ABC-C and VAS as primary outcomes using the MCT's for response definition. This work may help define future study inclusion criteria and enable future interpretation of treatment outcome results in the field.
在评估治疗方法时,估算临床结局评估中的有意义变化阈值(MCT)是一个重要的考量因素。在脆性X综合征(FXS)研究中,对于如何在几种常用的结局指标上定义MCT尚未达成共识。本研究的目的是利用阿巴氯芬3期临床试验的数据(Berry-Kravis等人,2017年),确定照料者评定评估中具有临床相关性的MCT。数据收集自之前阿巴氯芬用于FXS个体的3期双盲、安慰剂对照研究(Berry-Kravis等人,2017年)。这两项研究纳入了5至11岁年龄组(n = 159)和12至50岁年龄组(n = 119)。本研究考察了从基线到治疗第8周,在多个指标上患者体内有意义的变化阈值:ABC-C;PSI;《文兰适应行为量表第二版》(Vineland-II);以及焦虑和破坏性行为视觉模拟量表(VAS)。通过使用基于锚定的方法,以临床总体印象量表-严重程度(CGI-S)和临床总体印象量表-改善(CGI-I)作为锚定指标,来确定MCT。通过检查基于锚定分析的结果和可视化累积分布函数图,在儿科研究中观察到ABC-C分量表的MCT(根据使用CGI-S或CGI-I作为锚定指标,范围有所不同):易怒:11.1至14.8分;多动:6.7至8.9分;社交无反应/嗜睡:6.6至8.1分;以及两个VAS分量表:焦虑:28.3至36.2毫米;破坏性行为:22.4至27.4毫米。在《文兰适应行为量表第二版》和PSI分量表中未观察到此类阈值。我们对MCT的分析有助于为解释FXS临床试验结果奠定基础。这可能包括使用ABC-C和VAS的相关分量表作为主要结局指标,并使用MCT来定义反应。这项工作可能有助于确定未来研究的纳入标准,并使该领域未来能够对治疗结局结果进行解释。