Suppr超能文献

中国急性大血管闭塞性缺血性卒中血管内取栓中使用球囊引导导管(PROTECT-MT):一项多中心、开放标签、盲终点、随机对照试验。

Balloon guide catheters for endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion in China (PROTECT-MT): a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Center for Clinical Neuroscience, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China; Oriental Pan-Vascular Devices Innovation College, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China; Institute of Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology of Ministry of Education and the Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Neurovascular Center, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Lancet. 2024 Nov 30;404(10468):2165-2174. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02315-8. Epub 2024 Nov 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of using a balloon guide catheter during endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of using a balloon guide catheter during endovascular thrombectomy, compared with using a conventional guide catheter, in this patient population.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled trial at 28 hospitals in China. Adults aged 18 years or older with acute ischaemic stroke who were able to receive endovascular thrombectomy within 24 h after symptom onset, according to local guidelines, were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the balloon guide catheter group or the conventional guide catheter group using a central internet-based system with a minimisation algorithm. The treating physicians and patients were aware of treatment allocation, but clinical outcomes were collected by local trained physicians who were masked. Neurological assessments were performed at baseline, 24 h after randomisation, and at 7 days or hospital discharge (whichever occurred first). The primary outcome was functional recovery, assessed by change in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores (ranging from 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]) at 90 days in the intention-to-treat population and obtained from structured interviews. Treatment effect was estimated using ordinal logistic regression with adjustment for site and baseline prognostic factors (time from symptom onset to randomisation, the preferred thrombectomy strategy, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, prestroke function [estimated mRS score], and age). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05592054 (terminated).

FINDINGS

Between Feb 7 and Nov 13, 2023, 1698 patients were assessed for eligibility and 329 were randomly assigned to the balloon guide catheter group (n=164) or conventional guide catheter group (n=165) when the trial was paused and subsequently terminated on April 18, 2024, due to safety concerns. The median age was 69 years (IQR 59-76). Of 329 patients, 201 (61%) were male and 128 (39%) were female. Participants in the balloon guide catheter group had significantly worse scores on the mRS at 90 days than those in the conventional guide catheter group (adjusted common odds ratio 0·66 [95% CI 0·45-0·98]; p=0·037). All-cause mortality at 90 days was numerically higher in the balloon guide catheter group than in the conventional guide catheter group (39 [24%] vs 26 [16%]). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in intracranial haemorrhage, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, or other serious adverse events.

INTERPRETATION

Compared with conventional guide catheters, the use of balloon guide catheters led to worse functional recovery in patients receiving endovascular thrombectomy for intracranial large vessel occlusion. Future studies are needed to confirm these results.

FUNDING

National Natural Science Foundation of China, Shanghai Hospital Development Center, Biopharma Industry Promotion Center Shanghai, and Ton-bridge Medical Technology.

TRANSLATION

For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

摘要

背景

在急性缺血性卒中介入取栓治疗中,使用球囊导引导管与传统导引导管相比,对前循环大血管闭塞患者的有效性和安全性尚不确定。我们旨在评估在该患者人群中,与使用传统导引导管相比,使用球囊导引导管进行介入取栓治疗的有效性和安全性。

方法

我们在中国 28 家医院开展了一项多中心、开放标签、盲法终点、随机对照试验。符合以下条件的急性缺血性卒中老年患者(18 岁或以上)有资格接受发病后 24 小时内的血管内取栓治疗,符合当地指南的要求。使用中央互联网系统和最小化算法以 1:1 的比例将患者随机分配至球囊导引导管组或传统导引导管组。治疗医生和患者知晓治疗分配,但由当地受过培训的医生进行盲法收集临床结局。在基线、随机分组后 24 小时以及首次发生的 7 天或出院时(以先发生者为准)进行神经功能评估。主要结局是 90 天时改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分(范围 0[无症状]至 6[死亡])的变化,这是意向治疗人群中通过结构化访谈获得的。使用有序逻辑回归进行治疗效果估计,并调整了站点和基线预后因素(从症状发作到随机分组的时间、首选取栓策略、基线国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分、术前功能[估计的 mRS 评分]和年龄)。本试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT05592054(已终止)。

结果

在 2023 年 2 月 7 日至 11 月 13 日期间,对 1698 名患者进行了入选评估,在试验暂停并随后于 2024 年 4 月 18 日终止时,329 名患者被随机分配至球囊导引导管组(n=164)或传统导引导管组(n=165)。中位年龄为 69 岁(IQR:59-76)。在 329 名患者中,201 名(61%)为男性,128 名(39%)为女性。球囊导引导管组患者在 90 天时的 mRS 评分明显差于传统导引导管组(校正优势比 0.66 [95%CI:0.45-0.98];p=0.037)。球囊导引导管组 90 天时的全因死亡率(39[24%])高于传统导引导管组(26[16%]),但无统计学差异。两组颅内出血、症状性颅内出血或其他严重不良事件发生率无统计学差异。

结论

与传统导引导管相比,在接受颅内大血管闭塞血管内取栓治疗的患者中,使用球囊导引导管导致功能恢复更差。需要进一步研究来证实这些结果。

资金

国家自然科学基金、上海市医院发展中心、上海生物医药产业促进中心和通桥医疗科技。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验