Suppr超能文献

结合能力测试和人格测试区分脑损伤患者与精神疾病患者:一项针对波多黎各人群的验证研究

Separation of brain-damaged from psychiatric patients with the combined use of an ability and a personality test: a validation study with a Puerto Rican population.

作者信息

Arsuaga E N, Higgins J C, Sifre P A

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1986 Mar;42(2):328-31. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198603)42:2<328::aid-jclp2270420219>3.0.co;2-x.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to validate the results obtained by Watson, Gasser, Schaefer, Buranen, and Wold (1981) by utilizing the Smith Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (Form W) and the MMPI (Psychiatric-Organic) scale in combination. Forty recently admitted/readmitted male patients were given both the SDMT and the MMPI (P-O) at a point in their hospitalization in a private inpatient psychiatric hospital in Puerto Rico. The combined use of the Smith and the P-O scale, with the criteria originally developed by Watson et al. (1981), provided a modest level of discrimination by correctly identifying 80% of the brain-damaged sample (organic group) and 55% of the functional sample (psychiatric group) subjects. This combination of tests yielded an overall mean hit rate of 67.5%. These results moderately support the findings obtained by Watson et al. (1981).

摘要

本研究的目的是通过联合使用史密斯符号数字模态测验(W版)和明尼苏达多相人格测验(精神-器质性)量表,来验证沃森、加塞尔、谢弗、布拉嫩和沃尔德(1981年)所得到的结果。在波多黎各一家私立住院精神病医院,对40名近期入院/再次入院的男性患者在其住院期间的某个时间点进行了符号数字模态测验和明尼苏达多相人格测验(精神-器质性)。史密斯测验和精神-器质性量表的联合使用,按照沃森等人(1981年)最初制定的标准,通过正确识别80%的脑损伤样本(器质性组)和55%的功能性样本(精神性组)受试者,提供了一定程度的辨别力。这两种测验的组合产生了67.5%的总体平均命中率。这些结果适度支持了沃森等人(1981年)所得到的研究结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验