Shaffer J W, Pearson T A, Mead L A, Thomas C B
J Clin Psychol. 1986 Mar;42(2):363-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198603)42:2<363::aid-jclp2270420226>3.0.co;2-f.
Figure drawings obtained while subjects were in medical school were scored using two different scales: (a) Sophistication-of-Body-Concept, a scoring system that measures the overall quality of the drawings; and (b) Conventionality/deviancy of the drawings, as determined by the relative frequency with which 42 different characteristics occurred in the total sample of drawings. Figure drawings were obtained from 1951 to 1964. As of 1984, subjects were classified into 1 of 11 health outcome (disease) categories plus a "healthy" category. Statistical analysis included one-way analyses of variance and multiple logistic regression in which age and cigarette consumption were controlled. Several statistically significant differences among groups were noted with respect to Conventionality/deviancy, but not with respect to Sophistication-of-Body-Concept.
(a) 身体概念成熟度，这是一种衡量绘图整体质量的评分系统；(b) 绘图的常规性/偏差性，由42种不同特征在绘图总样本中出现的相对频率确定。人体绘图是在1951年至1964年期间获取的。截至1984年，受试者被分为11种健康结果（疾病）类别中的1种以及一个“健康”类别。统计分析包括单因素方差分析和多因素逻辑回归分析，其中控制了年龄和香烟消费量。在常规性/偏差性方面，各群体之间存在一些统计学上的显著差异，但在身体概念成熟度方面没有。
