Department of Counseling, Health, and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University-San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management. Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, Mississippi, USA.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2024 Dec;34(12):e14772. doi: 10.1111/sms.14772.
Training one limb with a high-load has been shown to augment strength changes in the opposite limb training with a low-load (via cross-education of strength), indicating that within-subject models can be problematic when investigating strength changes. This study examined if the cross-education of strength from unilateral high-load training could augment the strength changes in the opposite arm undergoing the same unilateral high-load training. 160 participants were randomized to one of four groups: (1) training on the dominant arm followed by the non-dominant arm (D + ND), (2) training on the dominant arm only (D-Only), (3) training on the non-dominant arm only (ND-Only), and (4) a non-exercise control. All exercise groups performed 18 sessions of unilateral high-load elbow flexion exercise over 6 weeks. Participants were compared for changes in 1RM strength and muscle thickness. Changes in strength of the non-dominant arm were greater in D + ND (2.7 kg) and ND-Only (2.6 kg) compared to D-Only (1.5 kg) and control (-0.2 kg), while the changes were greater in D-Only compared to control. The same finding was observed in the dominant arm. Only the arms being directly trained observed increases in muscle thickness. Unilateral high-load resistance training increased strength in the opposite untrained arm, without changes in muscle thickness. This cross-education of strength did not augment the strength changes in the contralateral arm undergoing the same unilateral high-load training. However, it does not necessarily indicate that within-subject models are methodologically sound to investigate strength change if both limbs are trained with a high-load.
单侧高负荷训练已被证明可以增强对侧肢体低负荷训练的力量变化(通过力量交叉教育),这表明在研究力量变化时,个体内模型可能存在问题。本研究旨在探讨单侧高负荷训练引起的力量交叉教育是否可以增强对侧肢体进行相同单侧高负荷训练时的力量变化。160 名参与者被随机分为四组:(1)先训练优势臂,再训练非优势臂(D+ND),(2)仅训练优势臂(D-Only),(3)仅训练非优势臂(ND-Only),(4)不进行运动的对照组。所有运动组均在 6 周内进行 18 次单侧高负荷肘部屈伸运动。比较参与者在 1RM 力量和肌肉厚度方面的变化。与 D-Only(1.5 公斤)和对照组(-0.2 公斤)相比,D+ND(2.7 公斤)和 ND-Only(2.6 公斤)的非优势臂力量变化更大,而 D-Only 与对照组相比,变化更大。在优势臂中也观察到了同样的发现。只有直接训练的手臂观察到肌肉厚度增加。单侧高负荷抗阻训练增加了未训练对侧手臂的力量,而肌肉厚度没有变化。这种力量的交叉教育并没有增强对侧手臂在进行相同单侧高负荷训练时的力量变化。然而,如果双侧肢体均进行高负荷训练,这并不一定表明个体内模型在研究力量变化时在方法学上是合理的。