Ramos Cadena Maria de Los Angeles, Sohn Ashley, Livengood Heather, Lee Ting-Fang, Rubin Batsheva, Hu Jiyuan, Sabel Bernhard A, Matayev Rachel, Panarelli Joseph, Wollstein Gadi, Schuman Joel S
Department of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York.
Division of Occupational Therapy, West Virginia School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Ophthalmol Sci. 2024 Sep 4;5(1):100614. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100614. eCollection 2025 Jan-Feb.
To determine the efficacy and safety of repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation (rtACS) treatment by assessing vision-related quality of life and visual function outcome in subjects treated with rtACS versus sham-control.
Double masked, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial (NCT03188042).
Sixteen subjects with moderate-to-advanced glaucoma (visual field [VF] mean deviation [MD] ≤-6.00 decibels) randomized into sham (9 subjects) or rtACS intervention (7 subjects) groups.
Subjects underwent 10 rtACS sessions over 2 weeks. All subjects had comprehensive ocular examination at baseline, 1-week, and 4-weeks posttreatment.
Visual acuity (VA), contrast sensitivity (CS), VF MD, number of threshold sensitivity points that changed or were unchanged, and vision-related quality of life (VR-QoL) questionnaire scores.
The rtACS group showed a significantly greater improvement from baseline to 4 weeks posttreatment compared with sham in VR-QoL domains including near activities ( < 0.01), dependency ( = 0.03), social functioning ( = 0.03), mental health ( < 0.01) and in the overall composite score ( = 0.04). No significant changes were detected with VA, CS, and VF analyses for either group. No serious adverse events were noted in either study group.
Repetitive transorbital alternating current stimulation therapy showed a significant beneficial effect on several domains of VR-QoL. Further studies will determine its utility in glaucoma.
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
通过评估接受重复经眶交流电刺激(rtACS)治疗与假对照治疗的受试者的视力相关生活质量和视觉功能结果,确定rtACS治疗的疗效和安全性。
双盲、随机、假对照临床试验(NCT03188042)。
16名中重度青光眼患者(视野[VF]平均偏差[MD]≤ -6.00分贝)被随机分为假治疗组(9名受试者)或rtACS干预组(7名受试者)。
受试者在2周内接受10次rtACS治疗。所有受试者在基线、治疗后1周和4周时均接受全面的眼部检查。
视力(VA)、对比敏感度(CS)、VF MD、变化或未变化的阈值敏感点数量以及视力相关生活质量(VR-QoL)问卷评分。
与假治疗组相比,rtACS组在治疗后4周时,在包括近距离活动(<0.01)、依赖程度(=0.03)、社交功能(=0.03)、心理健康(<0.01)以及总体综合评分(=0.04)等VR-QoL领域,从基线水平有显著更大的改善。两组在VA、CS和VF分析中均未检测到显著变化。两个研究组均未记录到严重不良事件。
重复经眶交流电刺激疗法对VR-QoL的多个领域显示出显著的有益效果。进一步的研究将确定其在青光眼治疗中的效用。
本文末尾的脚注和披露中可能会找到专有或商业披露信息。