• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者自我管理手术伤口以预防伤口并发症的能力:一项横断面研究。

Patients' Ability to Self-Manage Their Surgical Wound to Prevent Wound Complications: A Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Groenen Hannah, Bontekoning Nathan, Van Dieren Susan, Orsini Ricardo G, Boermeester Marja A, Tobiano Georgia, Eskes Anne M

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2025 Jul;81(7):4208-4215. doi: 10.1111/jan.16644. Epub 2024 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1111/jan.16644
PMID:39584563
Abstract

AIMS

To provide insights into postdischarge patients' experiences and preferences regarding surgical wound care education at discharge in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND

Patient involvement in wound care practices postdischarge is beneficial for the prevention of surgical site infections and has become an essential component in reducing the burden on healthcare systems. Surgical wound care discharge education is crucial to achieve this.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted using the 18-item Surgical Wounds And Patient Participation Questionnaire on patients who underwent surgery between January and May 2022. The survey was administered 2 weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

In total, 213 patients completed the survey. Most patients preferred verbal instructions about their surgical wound care (n = 146; 84.9%) at the time of discharge, with 52.3% indicating a preference for multiple forms of information. Approximately three-quarters of patients (n = 99; 76.7%) responded that they were able to successfully take care of their wounds at home and 16.3% indicated wound self-care inability.

CONCLUSION

Our study highlighted patients' preferences for verbal instructions about their surgical wound care at the time of discharge. Notably, half of the patients expressed a desire for multiple forms of information. Furthermore, we identified gaps in the information provided to patients, indicating areas for improvement in discharge communication.

IMPLICATIONS

The identified gaps in surgical wound care discharge education offer opportunities to enhance in-hospital education by aligning it more closely with patient preferences and providing education of topics often missed. This could ultimately improve their ability to self-manage their surgical wound at home. Future research should delve deeper into understanding the factors influencing patients' ability to self-manage their wounds.

IMPACT

Despite the acknowledged importance of patient education on surgical wound care, there is limited literature regarding patients' experiences and preferences in this area. The findings of this study highlight patients' preferences for verbal instructions and reveal gaps in the information provided to patients about surgical wound care at the time of discharge. The identified gaps in information provided to surgical patients offer opportunities to enhance in-hospital education by healthcare professionals.

REPORTING METHOD

We adhered to the STROBE guideline.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

摘要

目的

深入了解荷兰出院患者在出院时接受手术伤口护理教育的经历和偏好。

背景

患者参与出院后的伤口护理实践有利于预防手术部位感染,已成为减轻医疗系统负担的重要组成部分。手术伤口护理出院教育对于实现这一目标至关重要。

方法

采用18项手术伤口与患者参与调查问卷,对2022年1月至5月接受手术的患者进行横断面调查。调查在术后2周进行。

结果

共有213名患者完成了调查。大多数患者在出院时更喜欢关于手术伤口护理的口头指导(n = 146;84.9%),52.3%的患者表示更喜欢多种形式的信息。约四分之三的患者(n = 99;76.7%)回答说他们能够在家中成功护理伤口,16.3%的患者表示无法进行伤口自我护理。

结论

我们的研究突出了患者在出院时对手术伤口护理口头指导的偏好。值得注意的是,一半的患者表示希望获得多种形式的信息。此外,我们发现了向患者提供的信息存在差距,表明出院沟通方面有待改进的领域。

启示

手术伤口护理出院教育中发现的差距提供了机会,通过使其更紧密地符合患者偏好并提供经常被遗漏主题的教育来加强院内教育。这最终可以提高他们在家中自我管理手术伤口的能力。未来的研究应更深入地探究影响患者伤口自我管理能力的因素。

影响

尽管患者教育对手术伤口护理的重要性已得到认可,但关于患者在该领域的经历和偏好的文献有限。本研究的结果突出了患者对口头指导的偏好,并揭示了出院时向患者提供的手术伤口护理信息存在的差距。向手术患者提供的信息中发现的差距为医疗专业人员加强院内教育提供了机会。

报告方法

我们遵循了STROBE指南。

患者或公众参与

无患者或公众参与。

相似文献

1
Patients' Ability to Self-Manage Their Surgical Wound to Prevent Wound Complications: A Cross-Sectional Study.患者自我管理手术伤口以预防伤口并发症的能力:一项横断面研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Jul;81(7):4208-4215. doi: 10.1111/jan.16644. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
2
Patient experiences of, and preferences for, surgical wound care education.患者对手术伤口护理教育的体验和偏好。
Int Wound J. 2023 May;20(5):1687-1699. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14030. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
3
Exploratory study of patients' and carers' preferences for postdischarge surgical wound monitoring using survey and interviews.通过调查和访谈对患者及护理人员对出院后手术伤口监测的偏好进行探索性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):e087320. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087320.
4
Development and validation of a survey designed to measure patient experience of and preference for surgical wound care discharge education: A pilot study.旨在测量患者对手术伤口护理出院教育的体验和偏好的调查工具的开发和验证:一项试点研究。
J Tissue Viability. 2023 Aug;32(3):442-448. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2023.06.003. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
5
General surgical patients' experience of hospital discharge education: A qualitative study.普外科患者对出院教育的体验:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jan;29(1-2):e1-e10. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15057. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
6
Three wound-dressing strategies to reduce surgical site infection after abdominal surgery: the Bluebelle feasibility study and pilot RCT.三种减少腹部手术后手术部位感染的伤口处理策略:Bluebelle 可行性研究和初步 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(39):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta23390.
7
Discharge knowledge and concerns of patients going home with a wound.对带着伤口回家的患者进行出院知识宣教及关注其担忧问题。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2007 May-Jun;34(3):245-53; quiz 254-5. doi: 10.1097/01.WON.0000270817.06942.00.
8
Bariatric surgery: patient incision care and discharge concerns.减重手术:患者切口护理及出院注意事项
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2006 Jun;52(6):48-52, 54, 56 passim.
9
Patient perspectives on post-discharge surgical site infections: towards a patient-centered mobile health solution.患者对出院后手术部位感染的看法:迈向以患者为中心的移动健康解决方案。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 1;9(12):e114016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114016. eCollection 2014.
10
Evaluation of a Surgical Site Discharge Teaching Tool Using Pictures and a Mirror.使用图片和镜子对手术部位出院指导工具的评估。
Clin Nurse Spec. 2016 Mar-Apr;30(2):101-5. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000186.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Outcomes and Medicare Advantage Payer-Hospital Integration.手术结果与医疗保险优势支付方 - 医院整合
JAMA Surg. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.2885.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of a survey designed to measure patient experience of and preference for surgical wound care discharge education: A pilot study.旨在测量患者对手术伤口护理出院教育的体验和偏好的调查工具的开发和验证:一项试点研究。
J Tissue Viability. 2023 Aug;32(3):442-448. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2023.06.003. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
2
Patient experiences of, and preferences for, surgical wound care education.患者对手术伤口护理教育的体验和偏好。
Int Wound J. 2023 May;20(5):1687-1699. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14030. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
3
Worldwide incidence of surgical site infections in general surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 488,594 patients.
全球普通外科患者手术部位感染发生率:对 488594 例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2021 Nov;95:106136. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106136. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
4
A Novel Surgical Patient Engagement Model: A Qualitative Study of Postoperative Patients.一种新型手术患者参与模式:对术后患者的定性研究
J Surg Res. 2020 Apr;248:82-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.11.025. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
5
Burden of surgical site infections in the Netherlands: cost analyses and disability-adjusted life years.荷兰手术部位感染负担:成本分析和伤残调整生命年。
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Nov;103(3):293-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
6
Patient education in relation to informational needs and postoperative complications in surgical patients.患者教育与手术患者的信息需求和术后并发症有关。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Apr 21;32(1):35-40. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz032.
7
Facilitating patient participation by embracing patients' preferences-A discussion.通过接受患者偏好促进患者参与——一场讨论
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1070-1073. doi: 10.1111/jep.13126. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
8
The forward-backward and dual-panel translation methods are comparable in producing semantic equivalent versions of a heart quality of life questionnaire.向前-向后翻译法和双盲翻译法在生成心脏生活质量问卷的语义等效版本方面具有可比性。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2019 Feb;25(1):e12715. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12715. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
9
Patient- and family-centered care interventions for improving the quality of health care: A review of systematic reviews.以患者和家庭为中心的医疗护理干预措施,以提高医疗服务质量:系统评价综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Nov;87:69-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
10
Discharge education delivered to general surgical patients in their management of recovery post discharge: A systematic mixed studies review.出院教育在普外科患者出院后康复管理中的应用:系统混合研究综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Nov;87:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Jul 5.