Tanner Judith, Brierley Jones Lyn, Westwood Nigel, Rochon Melissa, Wloch Catherine, Rogers Luke J, Vaja Ricky, Dearling Jeremy, Wilson Keith, Harrington Pauline, Brown Colin S, Murphy Gavin
University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):e087320. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087320.
To explore patients' and carers' preferences for postdischarge surgical wound monitoring.
Explanatory mixed methods study with an online survey followed by online interviews.
The online survey was distributed via the Cardiothoracic Interdisciplinary Research Network and cardiac surgery patient and public involvement groups in London and Leicester, UK. Participants were invited to share the survey link with other patients and carers. Interviewees were recruited through the survey.
Seventy participants completed the survey: 74% patients and 26% carers. A range of ages, sex, ethnicities and geographical locations were represented. Six survey patient participants volunteered to be interviewed.
Themes identified were the impact on patients of having a surgical site infection, patients' preferences for postdischarge surgical wound follow-up, access to specialist support, wound monitoring using digital technology and receiving information from the hospital about wounds and wound care. Interviewees described feeling isolated after discharge from hospital and 10% of survey patient respondents, including four of the six interviewees, reported hospital readmissions. Survey respondents' preferred routes for providing hospitals with wound information were over the telephone (30%), emails (24%), text messages (16%) and photos sent securely (14%). All six interviewees' preference was for digital approaches using images. Survey respondents were least likely (50%) to reply to questionnaires that required software to be downloaded and installed. Interviewees considered digital wound monitoring to be convenient and the best use of patient and staff resources. A new theme was identified where patients wanted to become more involved in treating their surgical wounds at home.
Experiences described by participants suggests there is a need to improve post-discharge wound monitoring. A new approach should be proactive, ongoing and provide easy access to healthcare services. Digital surgical wound monitoring offers these benefits and is acceptable to patients.
ISRCTN13950775; Post-results.
探讨患者及其护理人员对出院后手术伤口监测的偏好。
解释性混合方法研究,先进行在线调查,随后进行在线访谈。
在线调查通过心胸跨学科研究网络以及英国伦敦和莱斯特的心脏手术患者及公众参与小组进行分发。邀请参与者与其他患者和护理人员分享调查链接。通过该调查招募受访者。
70名参与者完成了调查,其中74%为患者,26%为护理人员。涵盖了不同年龄、性别、种族和地理位置。6名参与调查的患者自愿接受访谈。
确定的主题包括手术部位感染对患者的影响、患者对出院后手术伤口随访的偏好、获得专科支持的途径、使用数字技术进行伤口监测以及从医院获取有关伤口和伤口护理的信息。受访者表示出院后感到孤立,10%的参与调查的患者受访者(包括6名受访者中的4名)报告再次入院。调查受访者向医院提供伤口信息的首选途径是电话(30%)、电子邮件(24%)、短信(16%)和安全发送照片(14%)。所有6名受访者都倾向于使用图像的数字方式。调查受访者回复需要下载和安装软件的问卷的可能性最小(50%)。受访者认为数字伤口监测方便,是对患者和工作人员资源的最佳利用。确定了一个新主题,即患者希望在家庭中更多地参与治疗手术伤口。
参与者描述的经历表明有必要改善出院后伤口监测。新方法应积极主动、持续进行,并提供便捷的医疗服务获取途径。数字手术伤口监测具有这些优点,并且患者可以接受。
ISRCTN13950775;结果后注册。