• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮儿童锁骨下中心静脉置管首次尝试失败的风险因素,以及单次置管在降低导管相关发病率中的作用:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Risk factors for a failed first attempt at pediatric subclavian central venous catheters and the role of single-attempt placement in reducing catheter-related morbidity: a prospective observational study.

机构信息

Anesthesiology Department, Hedi Chaker University Hospital: University of Sfax, Tunisia.

Pediatric Surgery Department, Hedi Chaker University Hospital: University of Sfax, Tunisia.

出版信息

Br J Nurs. 2024 Nov 21;33(21):S24-S31. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2024.0421.

DOI:10.12968/bjon.2024.0421
PMID:39585228
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this observational study was to investigate the risk factors of a failed first attempt at pediatric central venous catheter (CVC) placement and its impact on CVC-related morbidity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective observational study, we included 3-month-to 5-year-old children proposed for infraclavicular subclavian vein catheterization consecutively sing the anatomic landmark technique. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 included single-attempt catheter placements, and Group 2 included failed first attempts at catheter placement. The management protocol was standardized for all patients. After comparing the two groups, univariable logistic regression was used to investigate the risk factors for a failed first attempt and to show the interest of the single-attempt catheter placement.

RESULTS

Among 150 pediatric CVC placements, the incidence of failed first attempts was 41.3% and its main risk factors were children with comorbidities (OR=3.11; 95%CI: 1.17-8.21), hematology and oncology patients (OR=5.6; 95%CI: 2.75-11.38), children with aplastic anemia (OR=3.05; 95%CI:1.388-6.705), and anesthesia sedation with I-Gel airway ventilation (OR=9.21; 95%CI: 1.080-78.5). On the other hand, a single-attempt catheter placement was a protective factor against catheter-related complications with OR=0.258 [0.12-0.55].

CONCLUSION

It seems that a single-attempt CVC placement may reduce the incidence of complications. The knowledge of the main risk factors of failed first attempts is mandatory for taking necessary precautions.

摘要

介绍

本观察性研究旨在探讨小儿中心静脉导管(CVC)首次尝试置管失败的风险因素及其对 CVC 相关发病率的影响。

材料和方法

在这项前瞻性观察性研究中,我们连续纳入了拟采用解剖标志技术行锁骨下静脉置管的 3 个月至 5 岁儿童。将患者分为两组:第 1 组为单次尝试置管组,第 2 组为首次尝试置管失败组。所有患者的管理方案均标准化。在比较两组后,我们使用单变量逻辑回归分析来探讨首次尝试置管失败的风险因素,并展示单次尝试置管的优势。

结果

在 150 例小儿 CVC 置管中,首次尝试置管失败的发生率为 41.3%,其主要风险因素包括合并症患儿(OR=3.11;95%CI:1.17-8.21)、血液科和肿瘤科患者(OR=5.6;95%CI:2.75-11.38)、再生障碍性贫血患儿(OR=3.05;95%CI:1.388-6.705)和应用 I-Gel 气道通气行麻醉镇静(OR=9.21;95%CI:1.080-78.5)。另一方面,单次尝试置管是导管相关并发症的保护因素,OR=0.258[0.12-0.55]。

结论

单次尝试 CVC 置管似乎可以降低并发症的发生率。了解首次尝试置管失败的主要风险因素对于采取必要的预防措施至关重要。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for a failed first attempt at pediatric subclavian central venous catheters and the role of single-attempt placement in reducing catheter-related morbidity: a prospective observational study.经皮儿童锁骨下中心静脉置管首次尝试失败的风险因素,以及单次置管在降低导管相关发病率中的作用:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Br J Nurs. 2024 Nov 21;33(21):S24-S31. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2024.0421.
2
Catheter malplacement during central venous cannulation through arm veins in pediatric patients.小儿患者经手臂静脉进行中心静脉置管时的导管误置
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2003 Jul;15(3):170-5. doi: 10.1097/00008506-200307000-00003.
3
Upper body central venous catheters in pediatric cardiac surgery.小儿心脏手术中的上肢中心静脉导管
Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Nov;23(11):980-8. doi: 10.1111/pan.12261. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
4
Complications and risks of central venous catheter placement in children.儿童中心静脉导管置入的并发症及风险
Surgery. 1998 Nov;124(5):911-6.
5
Percutaneous infraclavicular subclavian vein catheters in paediatric cancer patients in comparison with critically ill children: a one-year experience from a Tunisian hospital.与危重症儿童相比,突尼斯一家医院一年来对儿科癌症患者进行经皮锁骨下锁骨下静脉置管的经验。
Br J Nurs. 2024 Jan 25;33(2):S28-S32. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2024.33.2.S28.
6
The changing profile of safe techniques for the insertion of a central venous catheter in pediatric patients - improvement in the outcome with the experiences of 500 insertions in a single institution.儿科患者中心静脉导管插入安全技术的变化概况——单机构500例插入经验改善了结局
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Dec;51(12):2044-2047. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.09.037. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
7
Ultrasound-guided or landmark techniques for central venous catheter placement in critically ill children.超声引导或体表标志定位技术在危重症儿童中心静脉置管中的应用。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jan;44(1):61-72. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4985-8. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
8
Central Venous Catheter-Related Deep Vein Thrombosis in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.儿科心脏重症监护病房中心静脉导管相关的深静脉血栓形成。
J Surg Res. 2019 Sep;241:149-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.052. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
9
Impact of the insertion site of central venous catheters on central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients with cancer: results from a large prospective registry.中心静脉导管置管部位对癌症患者中心静脉导管相关性血流感染的影响:一项大型前瞻性登记研究结果。
Infection. 2023 Aug;51(4):1153-1159. doi: 10.1007/s15010-023-02029-4. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
10
Accurate placement of central venous catheters using a 16-cm catheter.使用16厘米长的导管精确放置中心静脉导管。
J Intensive Care Med. 1996 Jan-Feb;11(1):19-22. doi: 10.1177/088506669601100104.

引用本文的文献

1
Introduction of ultrasound-guided axillary vein approach for central venous catheterization in severely injured trauma patients: characteristics and concerns.严重创伤患者中心静脉置管超声引导腋静脉入路的介绍:特点与关注点
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 18;12:1603778. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1603778. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparing open surgical, SELDINGER'S technique with surgical isolation of the vein and ultrasound guided techniques for jugular central line insertion in infants: a randomized clinical trial.比较开放式手术、塞丁格技术、静脉手术隔离技术和超声引导技术用于婴儿颈内中心静脉置管:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02988-5.