Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房中针对替代决策者的四项支持干预措施的随机临床试验。

Randomized Clinical Trial of the Four Supports Intervention for Surrogate Decision-Makers in Intensive Care Units.

作者信息

Butler Rachel A, Seaman Jennifer B, Felman Kristyn, Stonehouse Wendy, San Pedro Rachel, Morse Jennifer Q, Chang Chung-Chou H, Lincoln Taylor, Reynolds Charles F, Landefeld Seth, Happ Mary Beth, Song Mi-Kyung, Angus Derek C, Arnold Robert M, White Douglas B

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine.

Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Mar;211(3):370-380. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202405-0931OC.

Abstract

Individuals acting as surrogate decision-makers for critically ill patients frequently struggle in this role and experience high levels of long-term psychological distress. Prior interventions that were designed solely to improve information sharing between clinicians and family members have been ineffective. We sought to examine the impact of a multicomponent family support intervention on patient and family outcomes. We conducted a patient-level randomized clinical trial at six ICUs in a healthcare system in Pennsylvania. An external interventionist interacted daily with surrogate decision-makers for incapacitated, critically ill patients at high risk of death or severe long-term functional impairment to deliver four types of protocolized support during the ICU stay: emotional support; communication support; decisional support; and, if indicated, anticipatory grief support. The control condition involved usual care plus two brief education sessions about critical illness. Primary outcome was the surrogates' scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at 6 months (range = 0-42). A total of 444 surrogates of 291 patients were enrolled (233 surrogates in intervention and 211 in control). The Four Supports intervention was delivered with high fidelity (frequency of per protocol delivery of key intervention elements, 97.1%; quality rating of intervention delivery, 2.9 ± 0.2 on a scale ranging from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating higher quality of intervention delivery). There was no intervention effect on the primary outcome, surrogates' Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale total scores at 6-month follow-up (β = 0.06; 95% confidence interval, -0.07 to 0.19;  = 0.35), or the prespecified secondary outcomes. Among critically ill patients at high risk of death or functional impairment, a family support intervention delivered by an external interventionist did not reduce surrogates' long-term psychological symptom burden.Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01982877).

摘要

作为重症患者的替代决策者,个人在这一角色中常常倍感艰难,并长期承受着高度的心理困扰。以往单纯旨在改善临床医生与家庭成员之间信息共享的干预措施效果不佳。我们试图研究一种多成分家庭支持干预措施对患者及其家庭结局的影响。我们在宾夕法尼亚州一个医疗系统的六个重症监护病房进行了一项患者层面的随机临床试验。一名外部干预人员每天与无行为能力、面临死亡或严重长期功能损害高风险的重症患者的替代决策者进行互动,在重症监护病房住院期间提供四种标准化支持:情感支持;沟通支持;决策支持;以及在必要时提供预期悲伤支持。对照条件包括常规护理以及两次关于危重病的简短教育课程。主要结局是替代决策者在6个月时的医院焦虑抑郁量表得分(范围为0至42)。共纳入了291名患者的444名替代决策者(干预组233名替代决策者,对照组211名)。四项支持干预措施的实施具有高保真度(关键干预要素的按方案交付频率为97.1%;干预实施的质量评级在1至3分的量表上为2.9±0.2,分数越高表明干预实施质量越高)。对主要结局、替代决策者在6个月随访时的医院焦虑抑郁量表总分(β=0.06;95%置信区间为-0.07至0.19;P=0.35)或预先设定的次要结局均无干预效果。在面临死亡或功能损害高风险的重症患者中,由外部干预人员提供的家庭支持干预措施并未减轻替代决策者的长期心理症状负担。该临床试验已在www.clinicaltrials.gov上注册(NCT01982877)。

相似文献

1
Randomized Clinical Trial of the Four Supports Intervention for Surrogate Decision-Makers in Intensive Care Units.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Mar;211(3):370-380. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202405-0931OC.
3
Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 2;12(12):CD011513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011513.pub2.
4
Early intervention (mobilization or active exercise) for critically ill adults in the intensive care unit.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 27;3(3):CD010754. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010754.pub2.
5
Specialist breast care nurses for support of women with breast cancer.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 3;2(2):CD005634. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005634.pub3.
6
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
8
9
Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD012404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012404.pub2.
10
Interventions to improve hearing aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 18;2016(8):CD010342. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010342.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Struggle Continues: Improving Outcomes for Surrogate Decision-Makers after the ICU.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Mar;211(3):309-311. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202411-2233ED.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomised controlled trial of a nurse facilitator to promote communication for family members of critically ill patients.
Intensive Care Med. 2024 May;50(5):712-724. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07390-y. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
2
Development and preliminary evaluation of EMPOWER for surrogate decision-makers of critically ill patients.
Palliat Support Care. 2022 Apr;20(2):167-177. doi: 10.1017/S1478951521000626.
3
Dealing With Death as an Outcome in Supportive Care Clinical Trials.
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jul 1;181(7):895-896. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1816.
9
A Randomized Trial of a Family-Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units.
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 21;378(25):2365-2375. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802637. Epub 2018 May 23.
10
Association of Racial Differences With End-of-Life Care Quality in the United States.
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Dec 1;177(12):1858-1860. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.4793.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验