• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

取消对再次捐献者的年龄上限限制并提高新捐献者的年龄上限:澳大利亚利用全面的捐献者监测系统得出的新不良事件发现。

Removing upper age restrictions for returning donors and increasing the new donor upper age: Novel adverse event findings using a comprehensive donor vigilance system in Australia.

作者信息

Speedy Joanna, Josling Gabrielle, Hoad Veronica C

机构信息

Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

School of Population and Global Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Vox Sang. 2025 Mar;120(3):315-319. doi: 10.1111/vox.13776. Epub 2024 Nov 25.

DOI:10.1111/vox.13776
PMID:39586299
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In July 2019, Australia removed the upper age limit for returning donors (previously 80 years) and increased the upper age for new donors from 70 to 75 years. This study assessed the safety of our new policy for our newly eligible upper age donors (NEUADs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For the period, 14 July 2019 to 30 June 2023, the relative risk (RR) of individual adverse events in NEUADs was compared with younger cohorts.

RESULTS

There were 4529 NEUADs who made 8000 donations. The overall rates of vasovagal reactions (VVRs) were significantly lower in the NEUAD cohort. However, compared with younger donors; returning NEUADs had a significantly higher rate of loss of consciousness (RR 2.62; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-4.86) and new NEUADs had a significantly higher rate of offsite VVRs (RR 1.60; 95% CI: 1.08-2.37). Both new and returning NEUADs had significantly higher rates of VVR requiring outside medical care (RR 2.48; 95% CI: 1.28-4.79 and RR 4.45; 95% CI: 2.00-9.91 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings support historical findings that overall VVR rates decline with age but suggest a higher risk of more serious VVRs.

摘要

背景与目的

2019年7月,澳大利亚取消了对回归献血者的年龄上限(此前为80岁),并将新献血者的年龄上限从70岁提高到75岁。本研究评估了我们针对新符合年龄上限的献血者(NEUADs)的新政策的安全性。

材料与方法

在2019年7月14日至2023年6月30日期间,将NEUADs中个体不良事件的相对风险(RR)与较年轻队列进行比较。

结果

有4529名NEUADs进行了8000次献血。NEUADs队列中血管迷走神经反应(VVRs)的总体发生率显著较低。然而,与年轻献血者相比,回归的NEUADs意识丧失发生率显著更高(RR 2.62;95%置信区间[CI]:1.41 - 4.86),新的NEUADs异地VVRs发生率显著更高(RR 1.60;95% CI:1.08 - 2.37)。新的和回归的NEUADs需要外部医疗护理的VVRs发生率均显著更高(分别为RR 2.48;95% CI:1.28 - 4.79和RR 4.45;95% CI:2.00 - 9.91)。

结论

我们的研究结果支持既往研究结果,即总体VVRs发生率随年龄下降,但提示更严重VVRs的风险更高。

相似文献

1
Removing upper age restrictions for returning donors and increasing the new donor upper age: Novel adverse event findings using a comprehensive donor vigilance system in Australia.取消对再次捐献者的年龄上限限制并提高新捐献者的年龄上限:澳大利亚利用全面的捐献者监测系统得出的新不良事件发现。
Vox Sang. 2025 Mar;120(3):315-319. doi: 10.1111/vox.13776. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
2
Case-control study of immediate and delayed vasovagal reactions in blood donors.献血者即刻和延迟血管迷走神经反应的病例对照研究。
Vox Sang. 2016 Oct;111(3):257-265. doi: 10.1111/vox.12418. Epub 2016 May 27.
3
Effect of a liberal versus a restrictive pre-donation blood pressure policy on whole-blood donor adverse reactions.宽松与严格的献血前血压政策对全血捐献者不良反应的影响。
Vox Sang. 2019 May;114(4):317-324. doi: 10.1111/vox.12772. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
4
Vasovagal reactions in whole blood donors at three REDS-II blood centers in Brazil.巴西三个 REDS-II 血液中心全血献血者的血管迷走神经反应。
Transfusion. 2012 May;52(5):1070-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03432.x. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
5
Reduced risk of vasovagal reactions in Australian whole blood donors after national implementation of applied muscle tension and water loading.澳大利亚全国实施应用肌肉紧张和水负荷后,全血献血者血管迷走反应的风险降低。
Transfusion. 2020 May;60(5):918-921. doi: 10.1111/trf.15701. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
6
Interventions to reduce vasovagal reactions in blood donors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.减少献血者血管迷走神经反应的干预措施:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transfus Med. 2016 Feb;26(1):15-33. doi: 10.1111/tme.12275.
7
Pre-donation water and salty snacks to prevent vasovagal reactions among blood donors.献血前饮水和食用咸味小吃以预防献血者血管迷走神经反应。
Transfusion. 2023 Jan;63(1):156-162. doi: 10.1111/trf.17173. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
8
The relationship between blood test results and vasovagal reactions: An intra-individual comparative retrospective analysis of blood donor data in Japan.血液检测结果与血管迷走神经反应之间的关系:日本献血者数据的个体内比较回顾性分析。
Vox Sang. 2025 Mar;120(3):260-267. doi: 10.1111/vox.13787. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
9
Offering new and returned donors the option to give plasma: implications for donor retention and donor adverse events.为新老献血者提供捐献血浆的选择:对献血者保留率和献血者不良事件的影响。
Vox Sang. 2021 Mar;116(3):273-280. doi: 10.1111/vox.12977. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
10
Stratified analysis of risk factors affecting vasovagal reactions in first-time whole blood donors: A regional multi-center donor hemovigilance data study.分层分析首次全血捐献者血管迷走神经反应的影响因素:区域性多中心献血者血液警戒数据研究。
Transfus Clin Biol. 2024 Nov;31(4):237-243. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2024.09.001. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and contribution of elderly whole blood donors after raising the upper age limit: Hemovigilance data from a Chinese region from 2012 to 2023.提高年龄上限后老年全血捐献者的安全性及贡献:来自中国某地区2012年至2023年的血液警戒数据。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 10;20(9):e0331838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331838. eCollection 2025.
2
Rethinking the role of older donors in a sustainable blood supply.重新思考老年献血者在可持续血液供应中的作用。
Transfusion. 2025 Apr;65(4):758-766. doi: 10.1111/trf.18190. Epub 2025 Mar 6.