Al-Abcha Abdullah, Clay Shannon, Wang Ling, Prasad Rohan Madhu, Salam Mohammad Fahad, Srivastava Shaurya, Boumegouas Manel, Abela George S, Saleh Yehia, Essa Essa M
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Carmel Healthcare, Columbus, Ohio.
Am J Cardiol. 2025 Mar 1;238:21-24. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.11.026. Epub 2024 Nov 24.
Vitamin K antagonists remain the mainstay of therapy in patients with left ventricular thrombus (LVT) because the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is not well-established. We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of adults admitted between January 2015 and December 2021 and diagnosed with LVT to compare the safety and efficacy of warfarin versus DOACs. The primary outcome was thrombus resolution. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, bleeding events, and stroke or systemic embolism. A total of 189 patients were included. The rate of thrombus resolution was similar in patients with LVT treated with DOACs compared with those treated with warfarin (DOACs 73.9%vs warfarin 68.5%, p = 0.489). In addition, all-cause mortality (DOACs 13.04% vs warfarin 9.79%, p = 0.583), bleeding events (DOACs 19.57% vs warfarin 13.99%, p = 0.361), and stroke or systemic embolism (DOACs 10.87% vs warfarin 15.38%, p = 0.446) were all similar in the 2 groups. In the propensity-matched group, 90 patients were included. Multivariate analysis showed no significant difference of using warfarin or DOACs on thrombus resolution (odds ratio [OR] 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.858 to 1.029, p = 0.18), all-cause mortality (OR 1.032, 95% CI 0.906 to 1.176, p = 0.6354), bleeding events (OR 1.694, 95% CI 0.168 to 17.097, p = 0.655), or stroke or systemic embolism (OR 1.947, 95% CI 0.087 to 4.756, p = 0.6747). In conclusion, in our retrospective analysis, DOACs had similar efficacy and safety compared with warfarin in the treatment of LVT.
维生素K拮抗剂仍然是左心室血栓(LVT)患者治疗的主要手段,因为直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)的疗效尚未得到充分证实。我们对2015年1月至2021年12月期间收治的诊断为LVT的成年患者进行了一项多中心回顾性分析,以比较华法林与DOACs的安全性和疗效。主要结局是血栓溶解。次要结局包括全因死亡率、出血事件以及中风或全身性栓塞。共纳入189例患者。与接受华法林治疗的LVT患者相比,接受DOACs治疗的患者血栓溶解率相似(DOACs为73.9%,华法林为68.5%,p = 0.489)。此外,两组的全因死亡率(DOACs为13.04%,华法林为9.79%,p = 0.583)、出血事件(DOACs为19.57%,华法林为13.99%,p = 0.361)以及中风或全身性栓塞(DOACs为10.87%,华法林为15.38%,p = 0.446)均相似。在倾向匹配组中,纳入了90例患者。多变量分析显示,使用华法林或DOACs在血栓溶解(优势比[OR]为0.94,95%置信区间[CI]为0.858至1.029,p = 0.18)、全因死亡率(OR为1.032,95%CI为0.906至1.176,p = 0.6354)、出血事件(OR为1.694,95%CI为0.168至17.097,p = 0.655)或中风或全身性栓塞(OR为1.947,95%CI为0.087至4.756,p = 0.6747)方面无显著差异。总之,在我们的回顾性分析中,DOACs在治疗LVT方面与华法林具有相似的疗效和安全性。