Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Neurosurgery Hannover Medical School, MHH, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Nov 25;166(1):477. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06354-x.
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting has become the standard treatment for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). Nevertheless, there is still disagreement on diagnostic criteria for selecting patients for surgery and optimal shunt management. The primary aim of the present study was to provide an update on the status of best practice, the use of different diagnostic algorithms and therapeutic management of idiopathic NPH in an European country. METHODS : A standardized questionnaire with sections on the assessment of clinical symptoms and signs of NPH, diagnostic work-up, therapeutic decision making, and operative techniques was sent to 135 neurosurgical clinics in Germany that regularly perform shunt surgeries.
Overall, responses were received from 114/135 (84.4%) clinics. Most responders considered gait disturbance to be the hallmark clinical sign of idiopathic NPH (96%). A lumbar tap test was utilized always/ mostly by 97 centers (86%). In 43% of the centers, 30-40 ml CSF were removed with the spinal tap test. Spinal dynamic CSF studies were used by 12 centers only occasionally, and only by 1 center always for diagnostic purposes. Ventriculo-peritoneal shunting was the most frequent type of CSF diversion (> 90%). Pressure-controlled valves were used by the majority of units (95%) Overall 102 centers (93%) always/mostly used adjustable valves, and antisiphon devices were used always/ mostly in 50% of units.
The present survey demonstrates that there has been a remarkable change of practice and opinions on the diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic NPH over the past two decades in Germany. Remarkably, variabilities in practice among different centers are less common than previously and recommendations according to scientific publications and guidelines have been implemented more readily.
脑脊髓液(CSF)分流术已成为特发性正常压力脑积水(NPH)的标准治疗方法。然而,对于选择手术患者和最佳分流管理的诊断标准仍存在分歧。本研究的主要目的是提供关于最佳实践现状、不同诊断算法的使用以及在欧洲国家特发性 NPH 治疗管理的最新信息。
我们向德国的 135 家神经外科诊所发送了一份标准化问卷,其中包括 NPH 临床症状和体征评估、诊断工作流程、治疗决策和手术技术等部分。
共收到 114/135(84.4%)家诊所的回复。大多数应答者认为步态障碍是特发性 NPH 的标志性临床体征(96%)。97 个中心始终/主要使用腰椎穿刺试验。43%的中心在腰椎穿刺试验中取出 30-40ml 的 CSF。12 个中心偶尔使用脊髓动态 CSF 研究,仅 1 个中心始终将其用于诊断目的。脑室-腹腔分流术是最常见的 CSF 引流类型(>90%)。大多数单位(95%)使用压力控制阀门。总体而言,102 个中心(93%)始终/主要使用可调节阀门,50%的单位始终/主要使用抗虹吸装置。
本调查表明,在过去二十年中,德国在特发性 NPH 的诊断和治疗方面发生了显著的实践和观念变化。值得注意的是,不同中心之间的实践差异比以前少见,并且更愿意根据科学出版物和指南进行推荐。