Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiology, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 1021, Tongil-ro, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, 03312, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 25;14(1):29249. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79348-5.
This bicenter retrospective analysis included 162 patients who had undergone prostate biopsy following prebiopsy MRI, excluding those with PCa identified only in the peripheral zone (PZ). DLR T2WI achieved a 69% reduction in scan time relative to TSE T2WI. The intermethod agreement between the two T2WI sets in terms of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) classification and extraprostatic extension (EPE) grade was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and diagnostic performance was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was found in 74 (45.7%) patients. Both T2WI methods showed high intermethod agreement for the overall PI-RADS classification (ICC: 0.907-0.949), EPE assessment (ICC: 0.925-0.957) and lesion size measurement (ICC: 0.980-0.996). DLR T2WI and TSE T2WI showed similar AUCs (0.666-0.814 versus 0.684-0.832) for predicting EPE. The AUCs for detecting csPCa with DLR T2WI (0.834-0.935) and TSE T2WI (0.891-0.935) were comparable in 139 patients with TZ lesions with no significant differences (P > 0.05). The findings suggest that DLR T2WI is an efficient alternative for TZ lesion assessment, offering reduced scan times without compromising diagnostic accuracy.
这项双中心回顾性分析纳入了 162 例在前列腺 MRI 检查后接受前列腺活检的患者,排除了仅在外周带(PZ)发现前列腺癌的患者。与 TSE T2WI 相比,DLR T2WI 扫描时间减少了 69%。使用组内相关系数(ICC)测量了两套 T2WI 之间在前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)分类和前列腺外延伸(EPE)分级方面的方法间一致性,并使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估了诊断性能。在 74 例(45.7%)患者中发现了临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)。两种 T2WI 方法在整体 PI-RADS 分类(ICC:0.907-0.949)、EPE 评估(ICC:0.925-0.957)和病变大小测量(ICC:0.980-0.996)方面均具有高度的方法间一致性。DLR T2WI 和 TSE T2WI 预测 EPE 的 AUC 相似(0.666-0.814 与 0.684-0.832)。在 139 例无 TZ 病变的患者中,DLR T2WI(0.834-0.935)和 TSE T2WI(0.891-0.935)检测 csPCa 的 AUC 相当,无显著差异(P>0.05)。这些发现表明,DLR T2WI 是 TZ 病变评估的有效替代方法,可减少扫描时间,而不影响诊断准确性。