Lim Hyun-Jin, Han Kang Min, Kim Seung-Hyun, Ryu Soo-Kyung, You Ji-Ran, Yoon Jung-Hee, Kwon Euna, Kim Ji-Eun, Kang Byeong-Cheol
Laboratory Animal Medicine, Graduate School of Translational Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, 103, Daehak-ro Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Pathology, CHA Ilsan Medical Center, Goyang-si, Republic of Korea.
Lab Anim Res. 2024 Nov 26;40(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s42826-024-00229-z.
Lac color, a natural red dye derived from the larvae of laccifer lacca kerr, is one of the most commonly used substances in food. To date, no studies have reported on the antigenicity of lac color and the other biomarkers that can determine anaphylactic reactions. To address this, we evaluated the antigenicity of lac color through active systemic anaphylaxis (ASA) in addition to identifying potential biomarkers performing exploratory studies. For ASA test, Guinea pigs (n = 5) were sensitized with 0(negative control), 4 mg/kg of lac color, 4 mg/kg of lac color + FCA, and 5 mg/kg of ovalbumin + FCA (positive control) 3 times a week for three weeks. Fourteen days after the last sensitization, animals were challenged intravenously weekly for two weeks. Hematological and histopathological analyses were performed and compared to control groups.
In the ASA test, all lac color groups showed mild symptoms such as nose rubbing, urination, and evacuation, which are insufficient indicators of anaphylaxis. Exploratory studies identified several biomarkers: decreased platelet count, and increased basophil count; distention in the lung, and redness on the inner wall of trachea; mononuclear inflammatory cell infiltration (MICI) in the ear, and heart hemorrhage. When these biomarkers were applied to the ASA test of lac color, in comparison to the negative control group, the positive control group (ovalbumin + FCA) showed a significant over 60-fold reduction in platelet count and nearly threefold higher basophil count compared to other groups. Furthermore, only positive control group exhibited full lung distention and severe redness on the inner wall of the trachea. Mononuclear inflammatory cell infiltration (MICI) in the ear was about three times higher, and heart hemorrhage was only present in the positive control group compared to others. None of the lac color groups were different from the negative control group (p > 0.05), whereas the positive control group was significantly different (p < 0.05).
Our study concludes that lac color, at the tested concentrations, does not induce antigenicity in the guinea pig model, providing valuable safety data. Furthermore, the biomarkers identified in this study offer a supportive approach to evaluating the immunogenicity of substances in future research.
紫胶色酸是一种从紫胶虫幼虫中提取的天然红色染料,是食品中最常用的物质之一。迄今为止,尚无关于紫胶色酸的抗原性以及可确定过敏反应的其他生物标志物的研究报道。为解决这一问题,我们通过主动全身过敏反应(ASA)评估了紫胶色酸的抗原性,并通过探索性研究确定了潜在的生物标志物。对于ASA试验,将豚鼠(n = 5)每周用0(阴性对照)、4mg/kg紫胶色酸、4mg/kg紫胶色酸+弗氏完全佐剂(FCA)和5mg/kg卵清蛋白+FCA(阳性对照)致敏3次,共持续3周。最后一次致敏后14天,每周对动物进行2周的静脉激发。进行血液学和组织病理学分析并与对照组进行比较。
在ASA试验中,所有紫胶色酸组均表现出轻度症状,如蹭鼻、排尿和排便,这些均不足以作为过敏反应的指标。探索性研究确定了几种生物标志物:血小板计数减少、嗜碱性粒细胞计数增加;肺部扩张、气管内壁发红;耳部单核细胞炎性细胞浸润(MICI)、心脏出血。当将这些生物标志物应用于紫胶色酸的ASA试验时,与阴性对照组相比,阳性对照组(卵清蛋白+FCA)的血小板计数显著降低超过60倍,嗜碱性粒细胞计数比其他组高出近3倍。此外,只有阳性对照组出现全肺扩张和气管内壁严重发红。耳部单核细胞炎性细胞浸润(MICI)比其他组高约3倍,心脏出血仅出现在阳性对照组。紫胶色酸组与阴性对照组无差异(p>0.05),而阳性对照组有显著差异(p<0.05)。
我们的研究得出结论,在所测试的浓度下,紫胶色酸在豚鼠模型中不会诱导抗原性,提供了有价值的安全性数据。此外,本研究中确定的生物标志物为未来研究中评估物质的免疫原性提供了一种支持性方法。