• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期卵巢癌的预后因素

Prognostic factors in advanced ovarian carcinoma.

作者信息

Redman J R, Petroni G R, Saigo P E, Geller N L, Hakes T B

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1986 Apr;4(4):515-23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1986.4.4.515.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.1986.4.4.515
PMID:3958765
Abstract

Nineteen factors were analyzed for prognostic significance in a series of 89 women with advanced (stage III or IV) ovarian carcinoma treated with chemotherapy after initial debulking surgery. Seventy-eight of these women received cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio), and cisplatin (CAP) treatment, and 11 received cyclophosphamide initially with Adriamycin and cisplatin administered at the time of recurrence. Median survival and remission duration were 25 and 19 months, respectively. Using survival as an end point, significant prognostic factors in univariate analyses included the total residual mass after debulking (P = .0007), largest residual mass after debulking (P = .0008), and stage (P = .0098). Using remission duration as an end point, significant prognostic factors in univariate analyses included total residual mass after debulking (P = .007) and the largest residual mass after debulking (P = .0020). The prognostic variables were then considered as possible predictors of survival in a multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model resulting in the following expression: lambda i(t)/lambda o(t) = exp(0.5928 (log TRM - 1.8117) + 0.6450 (stage - 0.3827) + 0.6673 (C4 - 0.4198) - 0.8596 (CAP - 0.8642)), where lambda i(t)/lambda o(t) is the risk of dying for a particular patient compared with the average risk of the entire group; log TRM is the log of the volume of the total residual mass in cm3 plus 1.0; stage = 0 if stage III, 1 if stage IV; C4 = 0 if cytologic grade is 1, 2, or 3 and 1 if grade 4; CAP = 0 if treatment is cyclophosphamide and 1 if CAP. Median survival times of patients with relative risk greater than 1 and less than 1 are 43 and 19 months respectively. If this model is confirmed in a prospective study, then it could be used to assign risk and assess treatment options for similar patients at diagnosis.

摘要

对89例晚期(III期或IV期)卵巢癌患者在初次肿瘤细胞减灭术后接受化疗的情况进行了19项因素的预后意义分析。其中78例患者接受了环磷酰胺、阿霉素(阿德里亚实验室,俄亥俄州哥伦布市)和顺铂(CAP)治疗,11例患者最初接受环磷酰胺治疗,复发时给予阿霉素和顺铂。中位生存期和缓解期分别为25个月和19个月。以生存作为终点,单因素分析中的显著预后因素包括肿瘤细胞减灭术后的总残留肿块(P = 0.0007)、肿瘤细胞减灭术后最大残留肿块(P = 0.0008)和分期(P = 0.0098)。以缓解期作为终点,单因素分析中的显著预后因素包括肿瘤细胞减灭术后的总残留肿块(P = 0.007)和肿瘤细胞减灭术后最大残留肿块(P = 0.0020)。然后,使用Cox比例风险模型在多因素分析中将这些预后变量视为生存的可能预测因素,得出以下表达式:lambda i(t)/lambda o(t) = exp(0.5928 (log TRM - 1.8117) + 0.6450 (分期 - 0.3827) + 0.6673 (C4 - 0.4198) - 0.8596 (CAP - 0.8642)),其中lambda i(t)/lambda o(t)是特定患者与整个组的平均风险相比的死亡风险;log TRM是总残留肿块体积(cm3)加1.0后的对数;如果是III期,分期 = 0,如果是IV期,分期 = 1;如果细胞学分级为1、2或3,C = 0,如果分级为4,C = 1;如果治疗方案是环磷酰胺,CAP = 0,如果是CAP,CAP = 1。相对风险大于1和小于1的患者的中位生存时间分别为43个月和19个月。如果该模型在前瞻性研究中得到证实,那么它可用于在诊断时为类似患者分配风险并评估治疗方案。

相似文献

1
Prognostic factors in advanced ovarian carcinoma.晚期卵巢癌的预后因素
J Clin Oncol. 1986 Apr;4(4):515-23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1986.4.4.515.
2
Survival impact of surgical cytoreduction in stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer.手术细胞减灭术对IV期上皮性卵巢癌生存的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 1999 Mar;72(3):278-87. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1998.5145.
3
Carcinosarcoma of the ovary-a case series.卵巢癌肉瘤——病例系列
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Jan;100(1):128-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.07.119. Epub 2005 Oct 5.
4
Randomized trial of initial therapy with melphalan versus cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: initial and long term results--Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E2878.美法仑与顺铂联合化疗作为晚期卵巢癌初始治疗的随机试验:初步及长期结果——东部肿瘤协作组E2878研究
Cancer. 1996 Feb 15;77(4):733-42.
5
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary debulking surgery in advanced ovarian carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 285 patients.晚期卵巢癌的新辅助化疗或初次肿瘤细胞减灭术:285例患者的回顾性分析
Gynecol Oncol. 1998 Dec;71(3):431-6. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1998.5213.
6
[Treatment and prognostic factors for stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer].[IV期上皮性卵巢癌的治疗及预后因素]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2000 Apr;35(4):200-3.
7
Ovarian carcinosarcomas: clinicopathological prognostic factors and evaluation of chemotherapy regimens containing platinum.卵巢癌肉瘤:临床病理预后因素及含铂化疗方案的评估
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Jan;108(1):136-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.09.003. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
8
High-dose chemotherapy with autologous transplantation for persistent/relapsed ovarian cancer: a multivariate analysis of survival for 100 consecutively treated patients.
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Apr;15(4):1309-17. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.4.1309.
9
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Single-Institution Experience and a Review of the Literature.晚期卵巢癌的新辅助化疗:单机构经验及文献综述
Oncology. 2016;91(4):211-216. doi: 10.1159/000447743. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
10
Does the use of diagnostic PET/CT cause stage migration in patients with primary advanced ovarian cancer?诊断用 PET/CT 是否导致原发性晚期卵巢癌患者的分期迁移?
Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Mar;116(3):395-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.12.008. Epub 2009 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of laparoscopic Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (L-VPD) in patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer: the ULTRA-LAP trial pilot study.腹腔镜内脏腹膜减瘤术(L-VPD)治疗 III-IV 期卵巢癌患者的可行性:ULTRA-LAP 试验初步研究。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Mar;35(2):e14. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e14. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
2
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
3
Feasibility of laparoscopic diaphragmatic peritonectomy during Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (VPD) in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer.
腹腔镜膈肌腹膜切除术在 IIIC-IV 期卵巢癌内脏腹膜廓清术中的可行性。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Sep;31(5):e71. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e71.
4
Recent Advancements in Prognostic Factors of Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma.上皮性卵巢癌预后因素的最新进展
Int Sch Res Notices. 2014 Oct 29;2014:953509. doi: 10.1155/2014/953509. eCollection 2014.
5
Diaphragmatic peritonectomy versus full thickness diaphragmatic resection and pleurectomy during cytoreduction in patients with ovarian cancer.卵巢癌患者肿瘤细胞减灭术中膈肌腹膜切除术与全层膈肌切除术及胸膜切除术的比较
Int J Surg Oncol. 2013;2013:876150. doi: 10.1155/2013/876150. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
6
Considerations in the surgical management of ovarian cancer in the elderly.老年卵巢癌的手术治疗考虑因素。
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2013 Mar;14(1):12-21. doi: 10.1007/s11864-012-0216-2.
7
Optimal primary surgical treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.晚期上皮性卵巢癌的最佳初次手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Aug 10;2011(8):CD007565. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007565.pub2.
8
CA-125 change after chemotherapy in prediction of treatment outcome among advanced mucinous and clear cell epithelial ovarian cancers: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.化疗后CA-125变化在晚期黏液性和透明细胞上皮性卵巢癌治疗结局预测中的作用:一项妇科肿瘤学组研究
Cancer. 2009 Apr 1;115(7):1395-403. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24152.
9
Progesterone receptor isoforms A and B in human epithelial ovarian carcinoma: immunohistochemical and RT-PCR studies.人上皮性卵巢癌中孕激素受体A和B亚型:免疫组织化学和逆转录-聚合酶链反应研究
Br J Cancer. 2000 Dec;83(11):1488-94. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1463.
10
Tumour cell activity markers in epithelial ovarian cancer: are biochemical and cytometric indices complementary?上皮性卵巢癌中的肿瘤细胞活性标志物:生化指标和细胞计量指标是否具有互补性?
Br J Cancer. 1990 May;61(5):755-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1990.168.