A causal association between obesity and constipation: a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization study and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

Observational studies suggest a potential link between obesity and constipation, but existing results are conflicting. Therefore, we conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) study and meta-analysis to assess the causal relationship between obesity and the risk of constipation.

METHODS

In this study, independent genetic variants closely related to constipation were acquired from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to analyze the relationship between genetically predisposed obesity and the risk of constipation. Waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and body mass index (BMI) were collected from the GWAS. Then, the causal relationship between constipation and obesity was explored using a two-sample MR study in both directions. The robustness of the results was evaluated using sensitivity analysis. Furthermore, a systemic review and meta-analysis were performed to calculate relative risks (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Subgroup analyses stratified by age and obesity degree were completed. To evaluate whether the current studies were affected by unmeasured confounders, -values of each study were determined.

RESULTS

In MR analysis, the incidence of constipation increased with the increase in BMI [inverse variance-weighted (IVW) odds ratio (OR) = 1.138 (1.029, 1.260),  = 0.012]. In addition, constipation was impacted by WC [IVW OR = 1.220 (1.061, 1.402),  = 0.005]. However, there was no evidence that WHR [IVW OR = 1.833 (0.826, 4.065),  = 0.136] or HC [IVW OR = 0.949, (0.836, 1.077),  = 0.415] has a causal effect on constipation. In reverse MR analysis, there was no evidence supporting the causality between constipation and obesity [BMI IVW OR = 1.010 (0.998, 1.022),  = 0.089; WHR IVW OR = 1.000 (0.946, 1.057),  = 0.994; WC IVW OR = 1.008 (0.995, 1.022),  = 0.217; HC IVW OR = 0.996 (0.982, 1.011),  = 0.626]. In the meta-analysis, 14 eligible articles were included, involving 43,488 subjects. According to the results of the meta-analysis, the risk of obesity and overweight significantly increased the risk of constipation [RR = 1.145 (0.952, 1.376)]. This was consistent with the MR analysis results. Moreover, overweight and obesity were significantly related to a higher constipation risk among children [overweight RR = 1.112 (0.943, 1.312); obesity RR = 1.407 (1.282, 1.544)]. Additionally, overweight in adults could decrease the risk of constipation [RR = 0.940 (0.827, 1.068)]. Nevertheless, no significant association was observed between obesity in adults and the risk of constipation [RR = 1.000 (0.768, 1.303)]. Sensitivity analysis revealed the robustness of our findings.

CONCLUSION

In this combined MR study and meta-analysis, obesity is associated with an increased risk of constipation. The MR analysis demonstrates the causal relationship between genetically predisposed obesity and the risk of constipation. More research is required to investigate the potential correlation between obesity and the risk of constipation and associated mechanisms.