• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison Between Environmental DNA Metabarcoding and Traditional Survey Method to Identify Community Composition and Assembly of Stream Fish.

作者信息

Liu Ziyu, Hu Cong, You Wenhui, Li Shuxin, Wu Yongsheng, Liang Yangyang, Chu Ling, Yan Yunzhi, Zhang Chen

机构信息

School of Ecology and Environment Anhui Normal University Wuhu China.

Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Aquaculture & Stock Enhancement Fishery Institute of Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences Hefei China.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2024 Nov 25;14(11):e70627. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70627. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.70627
PMID:39588347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11588354/
Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has been widely used in freshwater systems, contributing to the advancements in the monitoring of fish diversity and community species composition. Nevertheless, the accuracy and reliability of eDNA metabarcoding in assessing functional structures and revealing the mechanisms underlying fish community assembly remain unclear. In this study, we combined a traditional survey method (electrofishing) and eDNA metabarcoding to conduct fish stock monitoring in the upper reaches of the Huishui stream. We assessed taxonomic and functional structures, as well as community assembly mechanisms, during dry and wet seasons. The results revealed that, compared with electrofishing surveys, eDNA metabarcoding detected a greater number of species and higher functional richness in both seasons. Despite significant differences in fish taxonomic composition between the seasons, both eDNA and traditional methods indicated that environmental filtering dominated the process of fish community assembly in both dry and wet seasons. We showed that eDNA metabarcoding is comparable to the electrofishing method in monitoring the community composition of stream fish and can accurately and reliably determine fish community assembly mechanisms. Combining functional traits and eDNA is a robust approach for monitoring stream fish community compared to taxonomic uncertainty.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef31/11588354/a3dbfceb3798/ECE3-14-e70627-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef31/11588354/7a8ea4e5a79b/ECE3-14-e70627-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef31/11588354/c6cf233e6cc2/ECE3-14-e70627-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef31/11588354/39ac216f813d/ECE3-14-e70627-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef31/11588354/bde4a6abfa18/ECE3-14-e70627-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef31/11588354/a3dbfceb3798/ECE3-14-e70627-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef31/11588354/7a8ea4e5a79b/ECE3-14-e70627-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef31/11588354/c6cf233e6cc2/ECE3-14-e70627-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef31/11588354/39ac216f813d/ECE3-14-e70627-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef31/11588354/bde4a6abfa18/ECE3-14-e70627-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef31/11588354/a3dbfceb3798/ECE3-14-e70627-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison Between Environmental DNA Metabarcoding and Traditional Survey Method to Identify Community Composition and Assembly of Stream Fish.
Ecol Evol. 2024 Nov 25;14(11):e70627. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70627. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Environmental DNA metabarcoding of water samples as a tool for monitoring Iberian freshwater fish composition.环境 DNA metabarcoding 水样作为监测伊比利亚淡水鱼组成的工具。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 30;18(10):e0283088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283088. eCollection 2023.
3
Freshwater fish community assessment using eDNA metabarcoding vs. capture-based methods: Differences in efficiency and resolution coupled to habitat and ecology.使用环境DNA宏条形码技术与基于捕获的方法对淡水鱼群落进行评估:效率和分辨率差异与栖息地及生态的关联
Environ Res. 2025 Jun 1;274:121238. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2025.121238. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
4
Application of environmental DNA metabarcoding to identify fish community characteristics in subtropical river systems.环境DNA宏条形码技术在亚热带河流系统鱼类群落特征识别中的应用。
Ecol Evol. 2024 May 9;14(5):e11214. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11214. eCollection 2024 May.
5
From sight to sequence: Underwater visual census vs environmental DNA metabarcoding for the monitoring of taxonomic and functional fish diversity.从视觉到序列:水下视觉普查与环境 DNA 宏条形码在鱼类分类和功能多样性监测中的比较。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Dec 15;956:177250. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177250. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
6
Multispecies models reveal that eDNA metabarcoding is more sensitive than backpack electrofishing for conducting fish surveys in freshwater streams.多物种模型表明,与背包式电鱼法相比,eDNA metabarcoding 对淡水溪流中的鱼类调查更敏感。
Mol Ecol. 2021 Jul;30(13):3111-3126. doi: 10.1111/mec.15644. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
7
Effects of sampling strategies and DNA extraction methods on eDNA metabarcoding: A case study of estuarine fish diversity monitoring.采样策略和 DNA 提取方法对环境 DNA metabarcoding 的影响:以河口鱼类多样性监测为例。
Zool Res. 2022 Mar 18;43(2):192-204. doi: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2021.331.
8
Quantitative monitoring of diverse fish communities on a large scale combining eDNA metabarcoding and qPCR.结合环境DNA宏条形码技术和定量聚合酶链反应对多种鱼类群落进行大规模定量监测。
Mol Ecol Resour. 2023 Feb;23(2):396-409. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13715. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
9
Monitoring of multiple fish species by quantitative environmental DNA metabarcoding surveys over two summer seasons.在两个夏季通过定量环境DNA宏条形码调查对多种鱼类进行监测。
Mol Ecol Resour. 2024 Jan;24(1):e13875. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13875. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
10
Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish community analysis in backwater lakes: A comparison of capture methods.环境 DNA 宏条形码在回水湖鱼类群落分析中的应用:捕获方法的比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 31;14(1):e0210357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210357. eCollection 2019.