Wang Sai, Wu Dong-Hai, Song Yong-Duo, Wang Tuan-Tuan, Fan Shi-Di, Wu En-Ni, Chen Nan-Lin, Xia Wen-Tong, Xu Min N, Chen Zhong-Bing, Wen Jing, Zhang Yang, Mo Ling, Xiang Lei
State Key Laboratory of Marine Resource Utilization in South China Sea Hainan University Haikou China.
College of Ecology and Environment Hainan University Haikou China.
Ecol Evol. 2024 May 9;14(5):e11214. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11214. eCollection 2024 May.
Fish are vital in river ecosystems; however, traditional investigations of fish usually cause ecological damage. Extracting DNA from aquatic environments and identifying DNA sequences offer an alternative, noninvasive approach for detecting fish species. In this study, the effects of environmental DNA (eDNA), coupled with PCR and next-generation sequencing, and electrofishing for identifying fish community composition and diversity were compared. In three subtropical rivers of southern China, fish specimens and eDNA in water were collected along the longitudinal (upstream-downstream) gradient of the rivers. Both fish population parameters, including species abundance and biomass, and eDNA OTU richness grouped 38 sampling sites into eight spatial zones with significant differences in local fish community composition. Compared with order-/family-level grouping, genus-/species-level grouping could more accurately reveal the differences between upstream zones I-III, midstream zones IV-V, and downstream zones VI-VIII. From the headwaters to the estuary, two environmental gradients significantly influenced the longitudinal distribution of the fish species, including the first gradient composed of habitat and physical water parameters and the second gradient composed of chemical water parameters. The high regression coefficient of alpha diversity between eDNA and electrofishing methods as well as the accurate identification of dominant, alien, and biomarker species in each spatial zone indicated that eDNA could characterize fish community attributes at a level similar to that of traditional approaches. Overall, our results demonstrated that eDNA metabarcoding can be used as an effective tool for revealing fish composition and diversity, which is important for using the eDNA technique in aquatic field monitoring.
鱼类在河流生态系统中至关重要;然而,传统的鱼类调查通常会造成生态破坏。从水生环境中提取DNA并识别DNA序列提供了一种检测鱼类物种的非侵入性替代方法。在本研究中,比较了环境DNA(eDNA)结合聚合酶链式反应(PCR)和下一代测序以及电捕鱼在识别鱼类群落组成和多样性方面的效果。在中国南方的三条亚热带河流中,沿着河流的纵向(上游 - 下游)梯度收集了鱼类标本和水中的eDNA。鱼类种群参数,包括物种丰度和生物量,以及eDNA操作分类单元(OTU)丰富度,都将38个采样点划分为八个空间区域,这些区域的当地鱼类群落组成存在显著差异。与目/科级分组相比,属/种级分组能够更准确地揭示上游I - III区、中游IV - V区和下游VI - VIII区之间的差异。从源头到河口,两个环境梯度显著影响了鱼类物种的纵向分布,第一个梯度由栖息地和水体物理参数组成,第二个梯度由水体化学参数组成。eDNA和电捕鱼方法之间的α多样性回归系数较高,以及在每个空间区域对优势种、外来种和指示物种的准确识别表明,eDNA能够在与传统方法相似的水平上表征鱼类群落特征。总体而言,我们的结果表明,eDNA宏条形码技术可作为揭示鱼类组成和多样性的有效工具,这对于在水生生物监测领域应用eDNA技术具有重要意义。