An Bochen, Ren Bowen, Liu Yihao, Liu Qingzu, Liu Chongyang, Han Zhenchuan, Wu Jianhui, Mao Keya, Liu Jianheng
Department of Orthopedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital.
Medical School of Chinese PLA General Hospital.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Jul 15;50(14):990-997. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005224. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
This retrospective study compared unilateral pedicle screw combined with contralateral translaminar facet joint screw (UPS+TFS) fixation with bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) fixation in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for single-segment lumbar degenerative disease.
To assess the long-term clinical efficacy of UPS+TFS fixation and BPS fixation in MIS-TLIF.
Limited research exists on the long-term clinical outcomes of UPS+TFS fixation in MIS-TLIF. This study addresses this gap by comparing UPS+TFS with the more common BPS fixation technique.
A retrospective analysis of 151 patients with single-segment lumbar degenerative disease treated with MIS-TLIF at Chinese PLA General Hospital (March 2011-December 2012) was conducted. Propensity score matching (1:1) resulted in 32 patients per group (UPS+TFS and BPS). Basic demographic characteristics, preoperative functional scores, perioperative indicators, and postoperative complications were compared between the groups. Lumbar and leg visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores up to 10 years postoperatively were also compared. The surgical outcomes of both groups were evaluated using the MacNab criteria at the final follow-up.
The UPS+TFS group had significantly lower lumbar VAS scores at three months postoperatively ( P <0.05) with less intraoperative blood loss, shorter surgery time, and reduced hospital stay compared with the BPS group ( P <0.05). No significant differences were found in the JOA or ODI scores between the two groups at three months and 1, 3, 5, and 10 years postsurgery ( P >0.05).
UPS+TFS and BPS fixation during MIS-TLIF can achieve favorable clinical outcomes with no difference in long-term clinical efficacy. UPS+TFS demonstrates perioperative advantages such as reduced intraoperative blood loss, shorter operation time, reduced postoperative hospital stay, and less iatrogenic injury. Therefore, MIS-TLIF with UPS+TFS fixation is a reliable treatment for single-segment lumbar degenerative disease.
本回顾性研究比较了在接受单节段腰椎退行性疾病微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MIS-TLIF)的患者中,单侧椎弓根螺钉联合对侧经椎板小关节螺钉(UPS+TFS)固定与双侧椎弓根螺钉(BPS)固定的效果。
评估UPS+TFS固定和BPS固定在MIS-TLIF中的长期临床疗效。
关于UPS+TFS固定在MIS-TLIF中的长期临床结果的研究有限。本研究通过比较UPS+TFS与更常用的BPS固定技术来填补这一空白。
对中国人民解放军总医院(2011年3月至2012年12月)接受MIS-TLIF治疗的151名单节段腰椎退行性疾病患者进行回顾性分析。倾向得分匹配(1:1)后,每组有32名患者(UPS+TFS组和BPS组)。比较两组患者的基本人口统计学特征、术前功能评分、围手术期指标和术后并发症。还比较了术后长达10年的腰椎和腿部视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)和日本矫形外科学会(JOA)评分。在最后随访时,使用MacNab标准评估两组的手术结果。
与BPS组相比,UPS+TFS组术后3个月时腰椎VAS评分显著更低(P<0.05),术中失血量更少,手术时间更短,住院时间更短(P<0.05)。两组在术后3个月以及术后1、3、5和10年时的JOA或ODI评分无显著差异(P>0.05)。
MIS-TLIF期间的UPS+TFS固定和BPS固定均可取得良好的临床效果,长期临床疗效无差异。UPS+TFS显示出围手术期优势,如术中失血量减少、手术时间缩短、术后住院时间缩短以及医源性损伤更少。因此,采用UPS+TFS固定的MIS-TLIF是治疗单节段腰椎退行性疾病的可靠方法。