Suppr超能文献

单侧椎弓根螺钉与对侧小关节螺钉联合固定在经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中的应用

The combined use of unilateral pedicle screw and contralateral facet joint screw fixation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

作者信息

Cao Yuanwu, Chen Zixian, Jiang Chun, Wan Shengcheng, Jiang Xiaoxing, Feng Zhenzhou

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin road, Xuhui district, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2015 Nov;24(11):2607-13. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4120-x. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This paper is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using unilateral pedicle screws along with contralateral translaminar facet joint screw (UPS+TFS) fixation in comparison with the method using bilateral pedicle screws fixation (BPS) in degenerative lumbar diseases.

METHODS

Forty patients with single-level lumbar diseases were divided into two groups randomly. One group was treated by TLIF with BPS fixation while the other group was treated by the new technique with UPS+TFS fixation. The preoperative and postoperative ODI, JOA, VAPS scores, mean operation time, mean operation blood loss, fusion rate and complications were collected for comparison under two surgical methods. In terms of complications, only two cases of superficial infection in the BPS group and one case of urinary tract infection in the other group was found.

RESULTS

The mean operation time and blood loss was significantly less in UPS+TFS group than in BPS group. The preoperation and postoperative ODI, JOA and VAPS at the intervals of 6 weeks, 3, 6 months and 1 year between the BPS and UPS+TFS group showed no significant disparities. Only one patient in UPS+TFS group was not fused with pseudoarthrosis formation.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical efficacy and safety of TLIF with UPS+TFS fixation were comparable to BPS fixation; however, the soft tissue injury and the corresponding operation cost were reduced with unilateral pedicle screw plus translaminar facet screw fixation.

摘要

目的

本文旨在评估在退行性腰椎疾病中,经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)采用单侧椎弓根螺钉联合对侧经椎板小关节螺钉(UPS+TFS)固定与双侧椎弓根螺钉固定(BPS)方法相比的疗效和安全性。

方法

40例单节段腰椎疾病患者随机分为两组。一组采用TLIF联合BPS固定治疗,另一组采用新技术UPS+TFS固定治疗。收集两种手术方法术前和术后的ODI、JOA、VAPS评分、平均手术时间、平均手术失血量、融合率及并发症进行比较。在并发症方面,仅发现BPS组有2例浅表感染,另一组有1例尿路感染。

结果

UPS+TFS组的平均手术时间和失血量明显少于BPS组。BPS组和UPS+TFS组术前及术后6周、3个月、6个月和1年时的ODI、JOA和VAPS无显著差异。UPS+TFS组仅有1例患者未融合,形成假关节。

结论

TLIF联合UPS+TFS固定的临床疗效和安全性与BPS固定相当;然而,单侧椎弓根螺钉加经椎板小关节螺钉固定可减少软组织损伤及相应的手术费用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验