Kuhar Rives, Williamson Madeline, Yee Peyton, Naik Guzel, Cursain Sean Michael, Condron Barry
Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22901, USA.
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2025 Mar;211(2):199-208. doi: 10.1007/s00359-024-01724-3. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
Animals often form organized cooperative foraging groups, where individual members must adhere to specific rules to maintain cohesiveness. These groups face the challenge of managing potential intruders, who may or may not assist in foraging. In semi-liquid food environments, Drosophila larvae learn to synchronize their movements into clusters, which are thought to make feeding more efficient. Individuals who do not synchronize with the group are excluded from the cluster. Whether clustering behavior occurs in wild-caught larvae, and if so, the extent of their selectivity in group membership, remains unknown. Here, we show that clustering occurs across a number of fly species, and the capacity to join different clusters varies both between and within species. We collected and observed a larval cluster from rotting fruit in the field, yielding seven fly species. Subsequent tests for clustering on five lines from this collection and 20 other inbred wild-caught lines revealed that all species, except D. suzukii, exhibit clustering behavior. Each line demonstrates varying capacities to become members of different clusters. This study also indicates that there is high genetic variance in how individual lines cluster with each other that is not explained by cross species features. Additionally, combinations of wild species with lab benchmark strains give varied outcomes in resultant adult fitness. The ability to co-cluster varies between and within species boundaries. However, fly lines that cluster with another tend to impart fitness both to themselves and their host. Our findings demonstrate that multiple species of fly larvae can co-cluster. This behavior tends to confer mutual benefits to cluster members, suggesting significant ecological implications in Drosophila communities.
动物常常会形成有组织的合作觅食群体,其中个体成员必须遵守特定规则以保持群体的凝聚力。这些群体面临着管理潜在入侵者的挑战,这些入侵者可能会也可能不会协助觅食。在半液态食物环境中,果蝇幼虫学会将它们的运动同步成集群,人们认为这会使进食更有效率。不同步的个体则会被排除在集群之外。野生捕获的幼虫是否会出现集群行为,如果会,它们在群体成员选择上的选择性程度如何,仍然未知。在这里,我们表明集群行为在多种果蝇物种中都会出现,并且加入不同集群的能力在物种之间和物种内部都有所不同。我们从野外腐烂的水果中收集并观察了一个幼虫集群,从中发现了七种果蝇物种。随后对这个样本中的五个品系以及另外20个野生捕获的近交品系进行的集群测试表明,除了铃木氏果蝇外,所有物种都表现出集群行为。每个品系表现出成为不同集群成员的不同能力。这项研究还表明,个体品系之间相互集群的方式存在高度的遗传差异,而这种差异无法用跨物种特征来解释。此外,野生物种与实验室基准菌株的组合在成年后的适应性方面产生了不同的结果。共同集群的能力在物种边界之间和内部都有所不同。然而,相互集群的果蝇品系往往会给自己和宿主都带来适应性。我们的研究结果表明,多种果蝇幼虫可以共同集群。这种行为往往会给集群成员带来互利,这表明在果蝇群落中具有重要的生态意义。