Maia Israel Silva, Cavalcanti Alexandre Biasi, Tramujas Lucas, Veiga Viviane Cordeiro, Oliveira Júlia Souza, Sady Erica Regina Ribeiro, Barbante Letícia Galvão, Nicola Marina Lazzari, Gurgel Rodrigo Magalhães, Damiani Lucas Petri, Negrelli Karina Leal, Miranda Tamiris Abait, Laranjeira Ligia Nasi, Tomazzini Bruno, Zandonai Cassio, Pincelli Mariangela Pimentel, Westphal Glauco Adrieno, Fernandes Ruthy Perotto, Figueiredo Rodrigo, Sartori Bustamante Cíntia Loss, Norbin Luiz Fernando, Boschi Emerson, Lessa Rafael, Romano Marcelo Pereira, Miura Mieko Cláudia, Soares de Alencar Filho Meton, Cés de Souza Dantas Vicente, Barreto Priscilla Alves, Hernandes Mauro Esteves, Grion Cintia, Laranjeira Alexandre Sanches, Mezzaroba Ana Luiza, Bahl Marina, Starke Ana Carolina, Biondi Rodrigo, Dal-Pizzol Felipe, Caser Eliana, Thompson Marlus Muri, Padial Andrea Allegrini, Leite Rodrigo Thot, Araújo Gustavo, Guimarães Mário, Aquino Priscilla, Lacerda Fábio, Hoffmann Filho Conrado Roberto, Melro Livia, Pacheco Eduardo, Ospina-Táscon Gustavo, Ferreira Juliana Carvalho, Calado Freires Fabricio Jocundo, Machado Flávia Ribeiro, Zampieri Fernando Godinho
Instituto de Pesquisa Hcor, São Paulo, Brazil; Divisão de Anestesiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Hospital Nereu Ramos, Florianópolis, Brazil; Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet), São Paulo, Brazil.
Instituto de Pesquisa Hcor, São Paulo, Brazil; Divisão de Anestesiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet), São Paulo, Brazil.
Br J Anaesth. 2025 Mar;134(3):693-702. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.10.012. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
This study aimed to assess whether a driving pressure-limiting strategy based on positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration according to best respiratory system compliance and tidal volume adjustment increases the number of ventilator-free days within 28 days in patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
This is a multi-centre, randomised trial, enrolling adults with moderate to severe ARDS secondary to community-acquired pneumonia. Patients were randomised to a driving pressure-limiting strategy or low PEEP strategy based on a PEEP:FiO table. All patients received volume assist-control mode until day 3 or when considered ready for spontaneous modes of ventilation. The primary outcome was ventilator-free days within 28 days. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital and intensive care unit mortality at 90 days.
The trial was stopped because of recruitment fatigue after 214 patients were randomised. In total, 198 patients (n=96 intervention group, n=102 control group) were available for analysis (median age 63 yr, [interquartile range 47-73 yr]; 36% were women). The mean difference in driving pressure up to day 3 between the intervention and control groups was -0.7 cm HO (95% confidence interval -1.4 to -0.1 cm HO). Mean ventilator-free days were 6 (sd 9) in the driving pressure-limiting strategy group and 7 (9) in the control group (proportional odds ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.39-1.32; P=0.28). There were no significant differences regarding secondary outcomes.
In patients with moderate to severe ARDS secondary to community-acquired pneumonia, a driving pressure-limiting strategy did not increase the number of ventilator-free days compared with a standard low PEEP strategy within 28 days.
NCT04972318.
本研究旨在评估根据最佳呼吸系统顺应性进行呼气末正压(PEEP)滴定并调整潮气量的驱动压力限制策略是否能增加中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者28天内的无呼吸机天数。
这是一项多中心随机试验,纳入社区获得性肺炎继发中重度ARDS的成年人。患者根据PEEP:FiO₂表格被随机分配至驱动压力限制策略组或低PEEP策略组。所有患者在第3天之前或被认为准备好采用自主通气模式之前均接受容量辅助控制模式。主要结局是28天内的无呼吸机天数。次要结局是90天时的院内和重症监护病房死亡率。
在214例患者被随机分组后,由于招募疲劳,试验停止。共有198例患者(干预组n = 96,对照组n = 102)可供分析(中位年龄63岁,[四分位间距47 - 73岁];36%为女性)。干预组和对照组直至第3天的驱动压力平均差值为-0.7 cm H₂O(95%置信区间-1.4至-0.1 cm H₂O)。驱动压力限制策略组的平均无呼吸机天数为6天(标准差9),对照组为7天(9)(比例优势比0.72,95%置信区间0.39 - 1.32;P = 0.28)。次要结局方面无显著差异。
在社区获得性肺炎继发中重度ARDS的患者中,与标准低PEEP策略相比,驱动压力限制策略在28天内并未增加无呼吸机天数。
NCT04972318。