• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of Lung Recruitment and Titrated Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) vs Low PEEP on Mortality in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.肺复张与滴定式呼气末正压通气(PEEP)对比低PEEP对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者死亡率的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1335-1345. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14171.
2
Effect of a Lower vs Higher Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Strategy on Ventilator-Free Days in ICU Patients Without ARDS: A Randomized Clinical Trial.低水平 vs 高水平呼气末正压通气策略对无急性呼吸窘迫综合征 ICU 患者呼吸机使用时间的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Dec 22;324(24):2509-2520. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23517.
3
Rationale, study design, and analysis plan of the Alveolar Recruitment for ARDS Trial (ART): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.肺泡复张在急性呼吸窘迫综合征治疗中的作用(ART)研究的原理、研究设计和分析计划:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Aug 28;13:153. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-153.
4
A high positive end-expiratory pressure, low tidal volume ventilatory strategy improves outcome in persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled trial.高呼气末正压、低潮气量通气策略可改善持续性急性呼吸窘迫综合征的预后:一项随机对照试验。
Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1311-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215598.84885.01.
5
Permissive Hypercapnia, Alveolar Recruitment and Low Airway Pressure (PHARLAP): a protocol for a phase 2 trial in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.允许性高碳酸血症、肺泡复张与低气道压力(PHARLAP):一项针对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的2期试验方案
Crit Care Resusc. 2018 Jun;20(2):139-149.
6
Effect of a Low vs Intermediate Tidal Volume Strategy on Ventilator-Free Days in Intensive Care Unit Patients Without ARDS: A Randomized Clinical Trial.低潮气量与中潮气量策略对无急性呼吸窘迫综合征的 ICU 患者呼吸机使用天数的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Nov 13;320(18):1872-1880. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14280.
7
Higher PEEP versus Lower PEEP Strategies for Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.高呼气末正压(PEEP)与低呼气末正压策略治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Oct;14(Supplement_4):S297-S303. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201704-338OT.
8
Personalised mechanical ventilation tailored to lung morphology versus low positive end-expiratory pressure for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in France (the LIVE study): a multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial.法国急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者肺形态个体化机械通气与低呼气末正压通气的比较(LIVE 研究):一项多中心、单盲、随机对照试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Oct;7(10):870-880. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30138-9. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
9
Ventilation strategy using low tidal volumes, recruitment maneuvers, and high positive end-expiratory pressure for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.采用低潮气量、肺复张手法及高呼气末正压通气策略治疗急性肺损伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征:一项随机对照试验
JAMA. 2008 Feb 13;299(6):637-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.6.637.
10
Effect of Intraoperative High Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) With Recruitment Maneuvers vs Low PEEP on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Obese Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.术中高呼气末正压(PEEP)联合复张手法与低 PEEP 对肥胖患者术后肺部并发症的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 18;321(23):2292-2305. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7505.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Pathophysiological Insights, Subphenotypes, and Clinical Implications-A Comprehensive Review.急性呼吸窘迫综合征:病理生理学见解、亚表型及临床意义——一篇综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 22;14(15):5184. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155184.
2
Driving pressure vs. oxygenation-based PEEP titration strategies in ARDS patients: a physiological study.急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中驱动压力与基于氧合的呼气末正压滴定策略:一项生理学研究
Crit Care. 2025 Jul 8;29(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05459-8.
3
Brazilian Research in Intensive Care Network (BRICNet): shaping the landscape of critical care research in Brazil and beyond.巴西重症监护网络研究(BRICNet):塑造巴西及其他地区重症监护研究的格局。
Crit Care Sci. 2025 Jun 20;37:e20250284. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250284. eCollection 2025.
4
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury: The Unseen Challenge in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Management.呼吸机相关性肺损伤:急性呼吸窘迫综合征管理中无形的挑战
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 2;14(11):3910. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113910.
5
Individualised Positive End-Expiratory Pressure During Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Guided by Intratidal Compliance-Volume Curve Analysis.在潮气量顺应性-容积曲线分析引导下的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的个体化呼气末正压
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Jul;69(6):e70067. doi: 10.1111/aas.70067.
6
Management of non-Cardiac Organ Failure in cardiogenic shock.心源性休克中非心脏器官衰竭的管理。
Am Heart J Plus. 2025 May 1;55:100549. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2025.100549. eCollection 2025 Jul.
7
Lung recruitment maneuver improves right and left ventricular function in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.肺复张手法可改善急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的右心室和左心室功能。
BMC Pulm Med. 2025 May 31;25(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03735-5.
8
Practice of ventilation in critically ill pediatric patients: protocol for an international, long-term, observational study, and results of the pilot feasibility study.危重症儿科患者的通气实践:一项国际长期观察性研究方案及初步可行性研究结果
Crit Care Sci. 2025 May 26;37:e20250398. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250398. eCollection 2025.
9
Analysis of the heterogeneous treatment effect of vasoactive drug dosage and time on hospital mortality across different sepsis phenotypes: a retrospective cohort study.血管活性药物剂量和时间对不同脓毒症表型患者医院死亡率的异质性治疗效果分析:一项回顾性队列研究
Eur J Med Res. 2025 May 24;30(1):410. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02660-x.
10
Effects of individualized PEEP on pulmonary function, cerebral blood flow and postoperative cognitive function in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer.个体化呼气末正压对直肠癌腹腔镜根治性切除患者肺功能、脑血流量及术后认知功能的影响
BMC Cancer. 2025 May 23;25(1):927. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14321-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Statistical analysis plan for the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial (ART). A randomized controlled trial.急性呼吸窘迫综合征肺泡复张试验(ART)的统计分析计划。一项随机对照试验。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017 Apr-Jun;29(2):142-153. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20170024.
2
Effect of driving pressure on mortality in ARDS patients during lung protective mechanical ventilation in two randomized controlled trials.两项随机对照试验中驱动压对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者在肺保护性机械通气期间死亡率的影响。
Crit Care. 2016 Nov 29;20(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1556-2.
3
Recruitment manoeuvres for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome receiving mechanical ventilation.接受机械通气的成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征的肺复张手法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 17;11(11):CD006667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006667.pub3.
4
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Subphenotypes Respond Differently to Randomized Fluid Management Strategy.急性呼吸窘迫综合征的亚型对随机液体管理策略反应不同。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb 1;195(3):331-338. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201603-0645OC.
5
Quantifying unintended exposure to high tidal volumes from breath stacking dyssynchrony in ARDS: the BREATHE criteria.量化急性呼吸窘迫综合征中因呼吸叠加不同步导致的意外高潮气量暴露:BREATHE标准
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Sep;42(9):1427-36. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4423-3. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
6
Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries.全球 50 个国家重症监护病房急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的流行病学、治疗模式和死亡率。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0291.
7
The "baby lung" became an adult.“婴儿肺”长成成人肺。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 May;42(5):663-673. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4200-8. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
8
Open Lung Approach for the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial.急性呼吸窘迫综合征的开放肺通气方法:一项初步随机对照试验
Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):32-42. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001383.
9
High PEEP levels are associated with overdistension and tidal recruitment/derecruitment in ARDS patients.高水平呼气末正压与急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的肺过度扩张及潮气量依赖的肺复张/萎陷有关。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Oct;59(9):1161-9. doi: 10.1111/aas.12563. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
10
Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome.驱动压与急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的生存。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):747-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1410639.

肺复张与滴定式呼气末正压通气(PEEP)对比低PEEP对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者死亡率的影响:一项随机临床试验

Effect of Lung Recruitment and Titrated Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) vs Low PEEP on Mortality in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Cavalcanti Alexandre Biasi, Suzumura Érica Aranha, Laranjeira Ligia Nasi, Paisani Denise de Moraes, Damiani Lucas Petri, Guimarães Helio Penna, Romano Edson Renato, Regenga Marisa de Moraes, Taniguchi Luzia Noriko Takahashi, Teixeira Cassiano, Pinheiro de Oliveira Roselaine, Machado Flavia Ribeiro, Diaz-Quijano Fredi Alexander, Filho Meton Soares de Alencar, Maia Israel Silva, Caser Eliana Bernardete, Filho Wilson de Oliveira, Borges Marcos de Carvalho, Martins Priscilla de Aquino, Matsui Mirna, Ospina-Tascón Gustavo Adolfo, Giancursi Thiago Simões, Giraldo-Ramirez Nelson Dario, Vieira Silvia Regina Rios, Assef Maria da Graça Pasquotto de Lima, Hasan Mohd Shahnaz, Szczeklik Wojciech, Rios Fernando, Amato Marcelo Britto Passos, Berwanger Otávio, Ribeiro de Carvalho Carlos Roberto

机构信息

HCor Research Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.

Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

出版信息

JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1335-1345. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14171.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2017.14171
PMID:28973363
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5710484/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The effects of recruitment maneuvers and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration on clinical outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remain uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if lung recruitment associated with PEEP titration according to the best respiratory-system compliance decreases 28-day mortality of patients with moderate to severe ARDS compared with a conventional low-PEEP strategy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter, randomized trial conducted at 120 intensive care units (ICUs) from 9 countries from November 17, 2011, through April 25, 2017, enrolling adults with moderate to severe ARDS.

INTERVENTIONS

An experimental strategy with a lung recruitment maneuver and PEEP titration according to the best respiratory-system compliance (n = 501; experimental group) or a control strategy of low PEEP (n = 509). All patients received volume-assist control mode until weaning.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality until 28 days. Secondary outcomes were length of ICU and hospital stay; ventilator-free days through day 28; pneumothorax requiring drainage within 7 days; barotrauma within 7 days; and ICU, in-hospital, and 6-month mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1010 patients (37.5% female; mean [SD] age, 50.9 [17.4] years) were enrolled and followed up. At 28 days, 277 of 501 patients (55.3%) in the experimental group and 251 of 509 patients (49.3%) in the control group had died (hazard ratio [HR], 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.42; P = .041). Compared with the control group, the experimental group strategy increased 6-month mortality (65.3% vs 59.9%; HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.38; P = .04), decreased the number of mean ventilator-free days (5.3 vs 6.4; difference, -1.1; 95% CI, -2.1 to -0.1; P = .03), increased the risk of pneumothorax requiring drainage (3.2% vs 1.2%; difference, 2.0%; 95% CI, 0.0% to 4.0%; P = .03), and the risk of barotrauma (5.6% vs 1.6%; difference, 4.0%; 95% CI, 1.5% to 6.5%; P = .001). There were no significant differences in the length of ICU stay, length of hospital stay, ICU mortality, and in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In patients with moderate to severe ARDS, a strategy with lung recruitment and titrated PEEP compared with low PEEP increased 28-day all-cause mortality. These findings do not support the routine use of lung recruitment maneuver and PEEP titration in these patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01374022.

摘要

重要性

肺复张手法和呼气末正压(PEEP)滴定对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者临床结局的影响仍不确定。

目的

确定与根据最佳呼吸系统顺应性进行PEEP滴定相关的肺复张与传统低PEEP策略相比,是否能降低中重度ARDS患者的28天死亡率。

设计、地点和参与者:2011年11月17日至2017年4月25日在9个国家的120个重症监护病房(ICU)进行的多中心随机试验,纳入中重度ARDS成人患者。

干预措施

一种采用肺复张手法并根据最佳呼吸系统顺应性进行PEEP滴定的试验策略(n = 501;试验组)或低PEEP对照策略(n = 509)。所有患者在撤机前均接受容量辅助控制模式。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局为28天内的全因死亡率。次要结局为ICU住院时间和住院时间;至第28天的无呼吸机天数;7天内需要引流的气胸;7天内的气压伤;以及ICU、住院和6个月死亡率。

结果

共纳入1010例患者(女性占37.5%;平均[标准差]年龄为50.9[17.4]岁)并进行随访。在28天时,试验组501例患者中有277例(55.3%)死亡,对照组509例患者中有251例(49.3%)死亡(风险比[HR],1.20;95%置信区间,1.01至1.42;P = 0.041)。与对照组相比,试验组策略增加了6个月死亡率(65.3%对59.9%;HR,1.18;95%置信区间,1.01至1.38;P = 0.04),减少了平均无呼吸机天数(5.3对6.4;差值,-1.1;95%置信区间,-2.1至-0.1;P = 0.03),增加了需要引流的气胸风险(3.2%对1.2%;差值,2.0%;95%置信区间,0.0%至4.0%;P = 0.03),以及气压伤风险(5.6%对1.6%;差值,4.0%;95%置信区间,1.5%至6.5%;P = 0.001)。在ICU住院时间、住院时间、ICU死亡率和住院死亡率方面无显著差异。

结论和相关性

在中重度ARDS患者中,与低PEEP相比,采用肺复张和滴定PEEP的策略增加了28天全因死亡率。这些发现不支持在这些患者中常规使用肺复张手法和PEEP滴定。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT01374022。