• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

监测麻醉护理是否是经导管主动脉瓣植入术的最佳麻醉策略?一项荟萃分析和系统评价。

Whether monitored anesthesia care is the optimal anesthetic strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation surgery? a meta-analysis and systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Surgery, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.

The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Nov 27;24(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02834-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12871-024-02834-w
PMID:39592928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11600798/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore whether monitored anesthesia care is more beneficial to the outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

METHODS

The research methodology involved comprehensive searches across major databases, including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, covering the period from January 1, 2010, to March 1, 2024. The aim was to identify trials comparing different anesthetic methods for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The primary outcomes assessed were mortality and length of hospital stay, while secondary outcomes included common complications such as bleeding, stroke, paravalvular leakage, renal failure, and others. Data synthesis was conducted using risk ratios or standardized mean differences, along with 95% confidence intervals. The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024507749).

RESULTS

A total of 35 trials and 45,616 patients were included in this study. The results showed that monitored anesthesia care significantly reduced the patient's risk of death, shortened the patient's length of hospital stay, and also reduced the risk of common complications such as paravalvular leakage (RR, 0.80; 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.88; p < 0.00001; I = 0) and stroke (RR, 0.80; 95% CI: 0.65 to 0.99; p = 0.04; I = 0).

CONCLUSION

Monitored anesthesia care has an absolute advantage in patient survival and effectively shortens the length of hospitalization. In addition, it also reduces the risk of complications such as paravalvular leakage and stroke. Monitoring care under anesthesia plays a vital role during TAVI surgery, not only helping to ensure the smooth progress of the surgery and patient safety, but also promoting the patient's recovery and recovery.

摘要

目的

探讨监测麻醉护理是否更有利于经导管主动脉瓣植入术的结局。

方法

研究方法包括全面检索主要数据库,包括 Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science,检索时间范围为 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2024 年 3 月 1 日。旨在识别比较不同麻醉方法用于经导管主动脉瓣植入术的试验。主要结局评估为死亡率和住院时间,次要结局包括常见并发症,如出血、中风、瓣周漏、肾衰竭等。使用风险比或标准化均数差值以及 95%置信区间进行数据综合。该研究方案前瞻性地在 PROSPERO(CRD42024507749)注册。

结果

共有 35 项试验和 45616 名患者纳入本研究。结果表明,监测麻醉护理显著降低了患者的死亡风险,缩短了患者的住院时间,同时降低了常见并发症(如瓣周漏,RR,0.80;95%CI:0.72 至 0.88;p<0.00001;I=0)和中风(RR,0.80;95%CI:0.65 至 0.99;p=0.04;I=0)的风险。

结论

监测麻醉护理在患者生存方面具有绝对优势,有效缩短了住院时间。此外,还降低了瓣周漏和中风等并发症的风险。在 TAVI 手术中,麻醉监测护理起着至关重要的作用,不仅有助于确保手术的顺利进行和患者的安全,还促进了患者的恢复和康复。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdc/11600798/20fb41e6a83d/12871_2024_2834_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdc/11600798/2f5eab1a3f92/12871_2024_2834_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdc/11600798/52bb13ab22f8/12871_2024_2834_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdc/11600798/28b1f8d98d1f/12871_2024_2834_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdc/11600798/c7971693cdee/12871_2024_2834_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdc/11600798/bf6a80de00e2/12871_2024_2834_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdc/11600798/57e52c507814/12871_2024_2834_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdc/11600798/20fb41e6a83d/12871_2024_2834_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdc/11600798/2f5eab1a3f92/12871_2024_2834_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdc/11600798/52bb13ab22f8/12871_2024_2834_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdc/11600798/28b1f8d98d1f/12871_2024_2834_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdc/11600798/c7971693cdee/12871_2024_2834_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdc/11600798/bf6a80de00e2/12871_2024_2834_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdc/11600798/57e52c507814/12871_2024_2834_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdc/11600798/20fb41e6a83d/12871_2024_2834_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Whether monitored anesthesia care is the optimal anesthetic strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation surgery? a meta-analysis and systematic review.监测麻醉护理是否是经导管主动脉瓣植入术的最佳麻醉策略?一项荟萃分析和系统评价。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Nov 27;24(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02834-w.
2
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
3
Meta-analysis of longitudinal comparison of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low to intermediate surgical risk.低至中度手术风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术纵向比较的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):8097-8106. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002158.
4
Is local anaesthesia a favourable approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing local and general anaesthesia.局部麻醉是经导管主动脉瓣植入术的一种有利方法吗?一项比较局部麻醉和全身麻醉的系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 25;7(9):e016321. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016321.
5
Local versus general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVR)--systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVR)的局部麻醉与全身麻醉——系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Med. 2014 Mar 10;12:41. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-41.
6
Fast-track cardiac care for adult cardiac surgical patients.针对成年心脏外科手术患者的快速心脏护理
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD003587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003587.pub2.
7
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis in high surgical risk patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗高危外科手术风险主动脉瓣狭窄患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0196877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196877. eCollection 2018.
8
[Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review of the literature on efficacy and safety data].经导管主动脉瓣植入术:关于疗效和安全性数据的文献系统评价
Recenti Prog Med. 2016 Jan;107(1):25-38. doi: 10.1701/2132.23102.
9
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With and Without Resheathing and Repositioning: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术伴和不伴重新护套和重新定位:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 21;11(12):e024707. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024707. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
10
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
The Influence of Audiovisual Distraction on Pain Reduction During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Under Monitored Anesthesia Care: A Prospective Randomized Trial.经食管超声心动图引导下主动脉瓣球囊扩张术治疗老年退行性主动脉瓣狭窄的临床疗效
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024 Jun;38(6):1353-1360. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.11.041. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
2
Comparative study between sedation and general anesthesia as an anesthesiologic approach for patients treated with TAVR. Which is the best for hemodynamic stability?经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者麻醉方法中镇静与全身麻醉的比较研究。哪种方法对血流动力学稳定性最佳?
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2024 Sep-Oct;79:88-91. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
3
New Practices in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: How I Do It in 2023.
经导管主动脉瓣植入术的新实践:2023年我的操作方法
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 8;12(4):1342. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041342.
4
Update on Minimalist TAVR Care Pathways: Approaches to Care in 2022.微创经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)治疗路径的最新进展:2022 年的治疗方法。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Sep;24(9):1179-1187. doi: 10.1007/s11886-022-01737-x. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
5
Neurologic Dysfunction and Neuroprotection in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的神经功能障碍与神经保护
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 Aug;36(8 Pt B):3224-3236. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.11.016. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
6
Postoperative Pulmonary Complications after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation under Monitored Anesthesia Care versus General Anesthesia: Retrospective Analysis at a Single Large Volume Center.监测麻醉护理与全身麻醉下经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的肺部并发症:单一大容量中心的回顾性分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 18;10(22):5365. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225365.
7
2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.2021年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 12;43(7):561-632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395.
8
Transcatheter Treatment of Valvular Heart Disease: A Review.经导管瓣膜病治疗:综述。
JAMA. 2021 Jun 22;325(24):2480-2494. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.2133.
9
Utilization, Costs, and Outcomes of Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中清醒镇静与全身麻醉的使用情况、成本及结局
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul;14(7):e010310. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.010310. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
10
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 解释和说明:系统评价报告的更新指南和范例。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160.