Suppr超能文献

监测麻醉护理与全身麻醉下经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的肺部并发症:单一大容量中心的回顾性分析

Postoperative Pulmonary Complications after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation under Monitored Anesthesia Care versus General Anesthesia: Retrospective Analysis at a Single Large Volume Center.

作者信息

Lee Sang-Wook, Lee Sangho, Hahm Kyung-Don

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 18;10(22):5365. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225365.

Abstract

Few studies to date have assessed the postoperative pulmonary complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) according to the anesthesia method. The present study aims to compare the effects of general anesthesia (GA) or monitored anesthesia care (MAC) on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI. This retrospective cohort study included 578 patients who underwent TAVI through the trans-femoral approach between August 2011 and May 2019 at a single tertiary academic center. The primary outcome was postoperative pulmonary complications, which were defined as the occurrence of one or more pulmonary complications, such as respiratory failure, respiratory infection, and radiologic findings, within 7 days after TAVI. Secondary outcomes included postoperative delirium, all-cause 30-day mortality rate, 30-day readmission rate, reoperation rate, vascular complications, permanent pacemaker/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion, length of stay in the ICU, hospital stay, and incidence of stroke. Of the 589 patients, 171 underwent TAVI under general anesthesia (GA), and 418 under monitored anesthesia care (MAC). The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications was significantly higher in the GA than in the MAC group (17.0% vs. 5.3%, < 0.001). Anesthetic method significantly affected the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications, but not of delirium. ICU stay was significantly shorter in the MAC group, as were operation time, the volume of fluid administered during surgery, heparin dose, transfusion, and inotrope requirements. TAVI under MAC can increase the efficiency of medical resources, reducing the lengths of ICU stay and the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications, compared with TAVI under GA.

摘要

迄今为止,很少有研究根据麻醉方法评估经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后的肺部并发症。本研究旨在比较全身麻醉(GA)或监护麻醉(MAC)对接受TAVI患者术后结局的影响。这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2011年8月至2019年5月期间在一家单一的三级学术中心经股动脉途径接受TAVI的578例患者。主要结局是术后肺部并发症,定义为TAVI后7天内出现一种或多种肺部并发症,如呼吸衰竭、呼吸道感染和影像学表现。次要结局包括术后谵妄、30天全因死亡率、30天再入院率、再次手术率、血管并发症、永久性起搏器/植入式心律转复除颤器植入、ICU住院时间、住院时间和卒中发生率。在这589例患者中,171例在全身麻醉(GA)下接受TAVI,418例在监护麻醉(MAC)下接受TAVI。GA组术后肺部并发症的发生率显著高于MAC组(17.0%对5.3%,<0.001)。麻醉方法显著影响术后肺部并发症的发生,但不影响谵妄的发生。MAC组的ICU住院时间显著缩短,手术时间、术中补液量、肝素剂量、输血和血管活性药物需求量也显著缩短。与GA下的TAVI相比,MAC下的TAVI可以提高医疗资源的效率,减少ICU住院时间和术后肺部并发症的发生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c186/8618621/5fd3fd6bd8e0/jcm-10-05365-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验