• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

监测麻醉护理与全身麻醉下经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的肺部并发症:单一大容量中心的回顾性分析

Postoperative Pulmonary Complications after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation under Monitored Anesthesia Care versus General Anesthesia: Retrospective Analysis at a Single Large Volume Center.

作者信息

Lee Sang-Wook, Lee Sangho, Hahm Kyung-Don

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 18;10(22):5365. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225365.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10225365
PMID:34830646
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8618621/
Abstract

Few studies to date have assessed the postoperative pulmonary complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) according to the anesthesia method. The present study aims to compare the effects of general anesthesia (GA) or monitored anesthesia care (MAC) on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI. This retrospective cohort study included 578 patients who underwent TAVI through the trans-femoral approach between August 2011 and May 2019 at a single tertiary academic center. The primary outcome was postoperative pulmonary complications, which were defined as the occurrence of one or more pulmonary complications, such as respiratory failure, respiratory infection, and radiologic findings, within 7 days after TAVI. Secondary outcomes included postoperative delirium, all-cause 30-day mortality rate, 30-day readmission rate, reoperation rate, vascular complications, permanent pacemaker/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion, length of stay in the ICU, hospital stay, and incidence of stroke. Of the 589 patients, 171 underwent TAVI under general anesthesia (GA), and 418 under monitored anesthesia care (MAC). The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications was significantly higher in the GA than in the MAC group (17.0% vs. 5.3%, < 0.001). Anesthetic method significantly affected the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications, but not of delirium. ICU stay was significantly shorter in the MAC group, as were operation time, the volume of fluid administered during surgery, heparin dose, transfusion, and inotrope requirements. TAVI under MAC can increase the efficiency of medical resources, reducing the lengths of ICU stay and the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications, compared with TAVI under GA.

摘要

迄今为止,很少有研究根据麻醉方法评估经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后的肺部并发症。本研究旨在比较全身麻醉(GA)或监护麻醉(MAC)对接受TAVI患者术后结局的影响。这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2011年8月至2019年5月期间在一家单一的三级学术中心经股动脉途径接受TAVI的578例患者。主要结局是术后肺部并发症,定义为TAVI后7天内出现一种或多种肺部并发症,如呼吸衰竭、呼吸道感染和影像学表现。次要结局包括术后谵妄、30天全因死亡率、30天再入院率、再次手术率、血管并发症、永久性起搏器/植入式心律转复除颤器植入、ICU住院时间、住院时间和卒中发生率。在这589例患者中,171例在全身麻醉(GA)下接受TAVI,418例在监护麻醉(MAC)下接受TAVI。GA组术后肺部并发症的发生率显著高于MAC组(17.0%对5.3%,<0.001)。麻醉方法显著影响术后肺部并发症的发生,但不影响谵妄的发生。MAC组的ICU住院时间显著缩短,手术时间、术中补液量、肝素剂量、输血和血管活性药物需求量也显著缩短。与GA下的TAVI相比,MAC下的TAVI可以提高医疗资源的效率,减少ICU住院时间和术后肺部并发症的发生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c186/8618621/2c62d49b439f/jcm-10-05365-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c186/8618621/5fd3fd6bd8e0/jcm-10-05365-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c186/8618621/2c62d49b439f/jcm-10-05365-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c186/8618621/5fd3fd6bd8e0/jcm-10-05365-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c186/8618621/2c62d49b439f/jcm-10-05365-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Postoperative Pulmonary Complications after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation under Monitored Anesthesia Care versus General Anesthesia: Retrospective Analysis at a Single Large Volume Center.监测麻醉护理与全身麻醉下经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的肺部并发症:单一大容量中心的回顾性分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 18;10(22):5365. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225365.
2
General Anesthesia Versus Monitored Anesthesia Care for Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Retrospective Study in a Single Belgian Referral Center.全身麻醉与监测麻醉护理在经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术中的应用:单一家喻户晓的比利时转诊中心的回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Dec;33(12):3283-3291. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.06.027. Epub 2019 Jun 23.
3
Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.在严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者行经导管主动脉瓣植入术中,清醒镇静与全身麻醉的比较。
Perfusion. 2023 Jan;38(1):186-192. doi: 10.1177/02676591211045801. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
4
Propensity Matched Analysis Comparing Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经倾向性评分匹配分析比较经导管主动脉瓣植入术中清醒镇静与全身麻醉的效果。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Jul 1;124(1):70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.03.042. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
5
Outcome After General Anesthesia Versus Monitored Anesthesia Care in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术全身麻醉与监护麻醉的效果比较
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Oct;30(5):1238-43. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.05.034. Epub 2016 May 21.
6
Comparison of clinical outcomes with the utilization of monitored anesthesia care vs. general anesthesia in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者中,监护麻醉与全身麻醉的临床结局比较。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Sep;17(6):384-90. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
7
Efficiency, Safety, and Quality of Life After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Performed With Moderate Sedation Versus General Anesthesia.经中度镇静与全身麻醉行经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的效率、安全性和生活质量。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Apr 1;125(7):1088-1095. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
8
General anesthesia vs. sedation in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): retrospective study of the incidence of acute kidney injury.全身麻醉与镇静在经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)中的应用:急性肾损伤发生率的回顾性研究。
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2021 Mar;68(3):121-127. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2020.09.013. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
9
Anesthesia and perioperative management of patients who undergo transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: an observational study of general versus local/regional anesthesia in 125 consecutive patients.行经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的麻醉和围手术期管理:125 例连续患者全身麻醉与局部/区域麻醉的观察性研究。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 Dec;25(6):1036-43. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.05.008. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
10
Impact of Anesthesia Type on Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (from the Multicenter ADVANCE Study).麻醉类型对经导管主动脉瓣植入术结局的影响(来自多中心ADVANCE研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Apr 15;117(8):1332-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.01.027. Epub 2016 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Whether monitored anesthesia care is the optimal anesthetic strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation surgery? a meta-analysis and systematic review.监测麻醉护理是否是经导管主动脉瓣植入术的最佳麻醉策略?一项荟萃分析和系统评价。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Nov 27;24(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02834-w.
2
Saudi Heart Association/National Heart Center/Saudi Arabian Cardiac Interventional Society/Saudi Society for Cardiac Surgeons/Saudi Cardiac Imaging Group 2023 TAVI Guidelines.沙特心脏协会/国家心脏中心/沙特阿拉伯心脏介入学会/沙特心脏外科医生协会/沙特心脏影像小组2023年经导管主动脉瓣置入术指南
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 15;36(2):184-231. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1379. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
General Versus Local Anesthesia With Conscious Sedation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: The Randomized SOLVE-TAVI Trial.全身麻醉与局部麻醉联合镇静在经导管主动脉瓣植入术中的应用:随机 SOLVE-TAVI 试验。
Circulation. 2020 Oct 13;142(15):1437-1447. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046451. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
2
Incidence, determinants and consequences of delirium in older patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术后老年患者谵妄的发生率、决定因素及后果
Age Ageing. 2020 Apr 27;49(3):389-394. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa001.
3
General Anesthesia Versus Monitored Anesthesia Care for Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Retrospective Study in a Single Belgian Referral Center.
Association of general anesthesia exposure with risk of postoperative delirium in patients receiving transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
全身麻醉暴露与行经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者术后谵妄风险的关联:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 27;13(1):16241. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43548-2.
4
Conscious sedation/monitored anesthesia care versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者中清醒镇静/监护麻醉与全身麻醉的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 10;9:1099959. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1099959. eCollection 2022.
全身麻醉与监测麻醉护理在经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣植入术中的应用:单一家喻户晓的比利时转诊中心的回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Dec;33(12):3283-3291. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.06.027. Epub 2019 Jun 23.
4
Delirium After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Under General Anesthesia: Incidence, Predictors, and Relation to Long-Term Survival.全麻下经导管主动脉瓣植入术后谵妄:发生率、预测因素及与长期生存的关系。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Nov;67(11):2325-2330. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16087. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
5
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经皮球囊扩张式主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1695-1705. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
6
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve in Low-Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗低危患者的自膨式瓣膜。
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 2;380(18):1706-1715. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
7
Postoperative delirium.术后谵妄。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Feb;72(1):4-12. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.00073.1. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
8
Is Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Better Than Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease? A Nationwide Inpatient Sample Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的比较:一项全国性住院患者样本分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Apr 1;7(7):e008408. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008408.
9
Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的清醒镇静与全身麻醉:来自美国胸外科医师学会/美国心脏病学会经导管瓣膜治疗注册研究的国家心血管数据注册协会的观点。
Circulation. 2017 Nov 28;136(22):2132-2140. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026656. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
10
Improved costs and outcomes with conscious sedation vs general anesthesia in TAVR patients: Time to wake up?经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者中,与全身麻醉相比,清醒镇静可改善成本和预后:是时候清醒了?
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 5;12(4):e0173777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173777. eCollection 2017.