Department of Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Wuhan Sports University, NO 279 Luoyu Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan, 430079, Hubei, China.
Graduate School, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, 430079, Hubei, China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Nov 27;19(1):797. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05290-x.
To determine the incidence of secondary vertebral compression fracture (SVCF) after percutaneous vertebral augmentation (PVA) and its correlative risk factors, and to provide theoretical evidence for clinical practice.
A retrospective analysis of 288 cases of PVA completed in our hospital from June 2020 to June 2023 was performed, and the patients were divided into the non-secondary vertebral compression fracture group (N-SVCF group) and the secondary vertebral compression fracture group (SVCF group) according to whether SVCF occurred during the postoperative follow-up review. Gender, age, body mass index (BMI), T value of bone mineral density (BMD-T), underlying diseases (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), intravertebral vacuum cleft (IVC), amount of bone cement injected, classification of cement diffusion, anterior vertebral recovery ratio, local Cobb angle correction rate, leakage of bone cement into the intervertebral space, and fat infiltration rate (FIR) of paraspinal muscles were collected from the patients. The incidence and risk factors of SVCF after PVA were evaluated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, and the predictive value of the independent risk factors was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) to determine the cut-off points at which they were meaningful for the development of SVCF.
In our study, the incidence of SVCF was 14.60% (42/288) in 288 patients who underwent PVA. Univariate analysis showed that age, BMI, fat infiltration rate of paraspinal muscles, cement leakage into the intervertebral space, unilateral/bilateral pedicle puncture approach and presence of IVC were statistically different between N-SVCF and SVCF (P < 0.05). Multifactorial regression analysis and ROC regression analysis revealed that the fat infiltration rate of the psoas major and erector spinae muscles, cement leakage into the intervertebral space, and IVC (P < 0.05) were risk factors for the incident of SVCF after PVA (P < 0.05). Psoas major (FIR) more than 5.490% and erector spinae (FIR) more than 52.413% had a high possibility of the occurrence of SVCF after PVA.
In this study, logistic regression combined with ROC curve analysis indicated that FIR of psoas major and erector spinae, cement leakage in the intervertebral space, and IVC were risk factors for the occurrence of SVCF after PVA. Psoas major (FIR) more than 5.490% and erector spinae (FIR) more than 52.413% had a high possibility of the occurrence of SVCF after PVA.
确定经皮椎体强化术(PVA)后继发性椎体压缩骨折(SVCF)的发生率及其相关危险因素,为临床实践提供理论依据。
回顾性分析 2020 年 6 月至 2023 年 6 月在我院完成的 288 例 PVA 患者的临床资料,根据术后随访复查是否发生 SVCF 将患者分为非继发性椎体压缩骨折组(N-SVCF 组)和继发性椎体压缩骨折组(SVCF 组)。收集患者的性别、年龄、体质量指数(BMI)、骨密度 T 值(BMD-T)、基础疾病(高血压、糖尿病、冠心病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病)、椎体内真空裂隙(IVC)、骨水泥注入量、骨水泥弥散分类、椎体前缘高度恢复率、局部 Cobb 角矫正率、骨水泥向椎间隙渗漏、椎旁肌肉脂肪浸润率(FIR)等资料。采用单因素和多因素 logistic 回归分析评估 PVA 后 SVCF 的发生率及其危险因素,并采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)评估独立危险因素的预测价值,确定其对 SVCF 发生有意义的截断点。
本研究 288 例行 PVA 患者中 SVCF 发生率为 14.60%(42/288)。单因素分析显示,年龄、BMI、椎旁肌肉 FIR、骨水泥向椎间隙渗漏、单侧/双侧椎弓根穿刺入路、IVC 存在与否在 N-SVCF 组和 SVCF 组之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素回归分析和 ROC 回归分析显示,腰大肌和竖脊肌 FIR、骨水泥向椎间隙渗漏、IVC(P<0.05)是 PVA 后 SVCF 发生的危险因素(P<0.05)。腰大肌 FIR 大于 5.490%和竖脊肌 FIR 大于 52.413%时,PVA 后发生 SVCF 的可能性较高。
本研究通过 logistic 回归结合 ROC 曲线分析发现,腰大肌和竖脊肌 FIR、骨水泥向椎间隙渗漏、IVC 是 PVA 后 SVCF 发生的危险因素。腰大肌 FIR 大于 5.490%和竖脊肌 FIR 大于 52.413%时,PVA 后发生 SVCF 的可能性较高。