Department of Physical Therapy, School of Paramedical and Rehabilitation Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Orthopaedic Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Department of Physical Therapy, School of Paramedical and Rehabilitation Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2024 Oct;40:270-278. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.04.008. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
The present study aimed to compare the effects of two treatment methods, including comprehensive physiotherapy (CPT), and routine physiotherapy (RPT) on pain, function, and quality of life in patients with subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS).
Forty patients with SAPS were randomly allocated into two groups. The RPT group (7 males, 13 females), (56.45 ± 9.65 years) received manual therapy and exercise therapy for shoulder joint. The CPT group (8 males, 12 females), (52.20 ± 7.39 years) received the above treatments administered to the RPT group plus scapular muscle stretching and strengthening exercise, scapular muscle motor control retraining, thoracic mobilization, and postural correction. Pain (visual analog scale; VAS), function (shoulder pain and disability index; SPADI and quick version of shoulder and hand questionnaire; quick DASH), and quality of life (Western Ontario rotator cuff questionnaire; WORC) were measured before, immediately, one, and six months after treatment.
Interaction of group by time was significant for pain (VAS) (f = 3.79, p = 0.01, partial eta-squared (ηp = 0.103), quick DASH (f = 5.34, p = 0.003, ηp = 0.139, WORC (f = 3.99, p = 0.01, ηp = 0.207) and was not significant for SPADI total score (f = 2.45, p = 0.07, ηp = 0.069). Although the two groups were similar immediately and 1 month post intervention, the CPT group performed better than the RPT group 6 months after intervention. At 6-month assessment, more patients in the CPT group reached the minimal clinically important differences as compared to control groups.
After six months, CPT was found to be more effective than RPT in improving pain, function, and quality of life.
本研究旨在比较两种治疗方法,包括综合物理疗法(CPT)和常规物理疗法(RPT),对肩峰下疼痛综合征(SAPS)患者疼痛、功能和生活质量的影响。
将 40 例 SAPS 患者随机分为两组。RPT 组(7 名男性,13 名女性),(56.45±9.65 岁)接受肩关节手法治疗和运动疗法。CPT 组(8 名男性,12 名女性),(52.20±7.39 岁)接受上述 RPT 组治疗,外加肩胛肌拉伸和强化运动、肩胛肌运动控制再训练、胸椎松动术和姿势矫正。治疗前、即刻、1 个月和 6 个月后分别测量疼痛(视觉模拟评分;VAS)、功能(肩痛和残疾指数;SPADI 和肩部和手部快速问卷;快速 DASH)和生活质量(安大略省肩袖问卷;WORC)。
疼痛(VAS)(f=3.79,p=0.01,部分 eta 平方(ηp)=0.103)、快速 DASH(f=5.34,p=0.003,ηp=0.139,WORC(f=3.99,p=0.01,ηp=0.207)组间时交互作用有统计学意义,但 SPADI 总分(f=2.45,p=0.07,ηp=0.069)无统计学意义。虽然两组在干预后即刻和 1 个月时相似,但 CPT 组在干预后 6 个月时表现优于 RPT 组。在 6 个月评估时,CPT 组有更多患者达到了最小临床重要差异。
6 个月后,CPT 在改善疼痛、功能和生活质量方面比 RPT 更有效。