Comparison of Three Internal Fixation Constructs for AO/OTA 33-A3 Distal Femoral Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.

BACKGROUND

To compare the biomechanical performance of three internal fixation constructs for AO/OTA 33-A3 distal femoral fractures.

METHODS

Thirty AO/OTA 33-A3 synthetic distal femoral fracture models were constructed and randomly divided into three groups. Group A (dual-plate construct) was fixed with a medial locking plate combined with a less invasive stabilization system (LISS). Group B was fixed with a retrograde femoral nail (RFN) combined with an LISS (RFN + LISS construct), and Group C was fixed with a retrograde tibial nail (RTN) combined with an LISS (RTN + LISS construct). The axial displacement, axial stiffness, torsional displacement, torsional stiffness and maximum failure load of different internal fixation constructs were recorded and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

In the axial compression test, the average stiffness of Group C was significantly higher than that of Groups A and B, and the average displacement of Group C was significantly smaller than that of Groups A and B. In the torsion test, the torsion degree of Group C was significantly lower than that of Groups A and B, and Group C had a higher torsional stiffness than Groups A and B. In the axial compression failure test, the average ultimate load (a displacement greater than 5 mm) of Group C was significantly higher than that of Groups A and B.

CONCLUSION

The biomechanical strength of the RTN combined with a plate is higher than that of the RFN combined with plate and dual-plate constructs, which can be used as an internal fixation option for the treatment of comminuted distal femoral fractures.