Sikiru Yinka, Paliwal Jitendra, Erkinbaev Chyngyz
Department of Biosystems Engineering, The University of Manitoba, E2-376, EITC, 75A Chancellor's Circle, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada.
Research and Innovation Office, The University of Winnipeg, 515 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3B 2E9, Canada.
Foods. 2024 Nov 14;13(22):3633. doi: 10.3390/foods13223633.
The quality evaluation of processed potatoes is vital in the food industry. In this study, the effect of three different drying methods on the post-processing quality of potatoes utilizing 4, 8, 12, and 16 h of freeze drying (FD), infrared drying (ID), and oven drying (OD) was investigated. The impact of the drying methods on the potato's microstructure was analyzed and quantified using 3D X-ray micro-computed tomography images. A new Hybrid Quality Score Evaluator (HQSE) was introduced and used to assess the Quality Index (QI) and Specific Energy Consumption Index (SECI) across various drying methods and durations. Mathematical models were developed to predict the optimal drying method. FD showed significantly higher ( < 0.05) colour retention, rehydration ratio, and total porosity, with minimal shrinkage, although it had higher energy consumption. ID had the shortest drying time, followed by OD and FD. The optimization showed that for FD, the optimal time of 5.78 h increased QI by 9.7% and SECI by 30.6%. The mathematical models could accurately predict the QI and SECI under different drying methods, balancing quality preservation with energy efficiency. The findings suggest that a hybrid drying system could optimize potato quality and energy consumption.
加工马铃薯的质量评估在食品工业中至关重要。在本研究中,研究了三种不同干燥方法(冷冻干燥(FD)、红外干燥(ID)和热风干燥(OD))在4、8、12和16小时的干燥时间下对马铃薯加工后品质的影响。使用三维X射线显微计算机断层扫描图像分析并量化了干燥方法对马铃薯微观结构的影响。引入了一种新的混合质量评分评估器(HQSE),用于评估各种干燥方法和干燥时间下的质量指数(QI)和比能耗指数(SECI)。开发了数学模型来预测最佳干燥方法。FD显示出显著更高(<0.05)的色泽保留率、复水率和总孔隙率,收缩率最小,尽管其能耗较高。ID的干燥时间最短,其次是OD和FD。优化结果表明,对于FD,5.78小时的最佳干燥时间使QI提高了9.7%,SECI提高了30.6%。数学模型可以准确预测不同干燥方法下的QI和SECI,在保持质量和能源效率之间取得平衡。研究结果表明,混合干燥系统可以优化马铃薯的品质和能耗。