• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多基因风险评分改善了来自意大利威尼托地区患者队列的黑色素瘤风险评估。

Polygenic Risk Score Improves Melanoma Risk Assessment in a Patient Cohort from the Veneto Region of Italy.

作者信息

Pellegrini Stefania, Potjer Thomas P, Del Bianco Paola, Vecchiato Antonella, Fabozzi Alessio, Piccin Luisa, Tonello Debora, van der Stoep Nienke, Tinsley Emily, Landi Maria Teresa, Iles Mark M, Menin Chiara

机构信息

Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.

Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZC Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Biology (Basel). 2024 Nov 20;13(11):954. doi: 10.3390/biology13110954.

DOI:10.3390/biology13110954
PMID:39596909
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11592222/
Abstract

Recent genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified many single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that alone weakly affect melanoma risk, but their combined effect on a polygenic risk score (PRS) can have a far bigger impact on estimating risk. However, the PRS is not yet at the stage of being utilized in clinical practice, and further evidence is needed. In this study, 270 melanoma patients fulfilling the criteria for a suspected genetic predisposition but with a negative genetic test for high/medium-penetrance genes were genotyped for 57 SNPs selected in previous GWASs to construct a PRS model. We found a significantly higher mean PRS in all melanoma cases than in controls (0.58 vs. 0.00, < 0.001), and the mean PRS in multiple primary melanoma cases was twice that in single melanoma cases (0.689 vs. 0.362, = 0.025). Interestingly, our results confirm the association of the PRS not only with other melanoma risk factors but also with a younger age at diagnosis. This evidence supports the potentially powerful discriminative role of PRS in the selection of high-risk patients who should undergo stricter surveillance protocols.

摘要

近期的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)已经鉴定出许多单核苷酸多态性(SNP),这些单核苷酸多态性单独对黑色素瘤风险的影响较弱,但其对多基因风险评分(PRS)的综合影响在估计风险方面可能产生大得多的影响。然而,PRS尚未达到可应用于临床实践的阶段,还需要更多证据。在本研究中,对270例符合疑似遗传易感性标准但高/中穿透性基因检测为阴性的黑色素瘤患者,针对先前GWAS中选择的57个SNP进行基因分型,以构建PRS模型。我们发现,所有黑色素瘤病例的平均PRS显著高于对照组(0.58对0.00,<0.001),多原发性黑色素瘤病例的平均PRS是单发性黑色素瘤病例的两倍(0.689对0.362,=0.025)。有趣的是,我们的结果证实PRS不仅与其他黑色素瘤风险因素相关,还与诊断时较年轻的年龄相关。这一证据支持了PRS在选择应接受更严格监测方案的高危患者方面可能具有的强大鉴别作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beae/11592222/5e69e181e3af/biology-13-00954-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beae/11592222/3a838b33d8a6/biology-13-00954-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beae/11592222/b4be2af05800/biology-13-00954-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beae/11592222/283e3be2b504/biology-13-00954-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beae/11592222/bd5ea95efdab/biology-13-00954-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beae/11592222/5e69e181e3af/biology-13-00954-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beae/11592222/3a838b33d8a6/biology-13-00954-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beae/11592222/b4be2af05800/biology-13-00954-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beae/11592222/283e3be2b504/biology-13-00954-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beae/11592222/bd5ea95efdab/biology-13-00954-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beae/11592222/5e69e181e3af/biology-13-00954-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Polygenic Risk Score Improves Melanoma Risk Assessment in a Patient Cohort from the Veneto Region of Italy.多基因风险评分改善了来自意大利威尼托地区患者队列的黑色素瘤风险评估。
Biology (Basel). 2024 Nov 20;13(11):954. doi: 10.3390/biology13110954.
2
Association between a 46-SNP Polygenic Risk Score and melanoma risk in Dutch patients with familial melanoma.46 个单核苷酸多态性遗传风险评分与荷兰有家族性黑色素瘤的患者黑色素瘤风险之间的关联。
J Med Genet. 2021 Nov;58(11):760-766. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107251. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
3
Combining common genetic variants and non-genetic risk factors to predict risk of cutaneous melanoma.结合常见遗传变异和非遗传风险因素预测皮肤黑色素瘤风险。
Hum Mol Genet. 2018 Dec 1;27(23):4145-4156. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy282.
4
Independent evaluation of melanoma polygenic risk scores in UK and Australian prospective cohorts.独立评估英国和澳大利亚前瞻性队列的黑色素瘤多基因风险评分。
Br J Dermatol. 2022 May;186(5):823-834. doi: 10.1111/bjd.20956. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
5
Polygenic risk and hazard scores for Alzheimer's disease prediction.多基因风险和阿尔茨海默病预测的危害评分。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019 Feb 18;6(3):456-465. doi: 10.1002/acn3.716. eCollection 2019 Mar.
6
Genome-wide association studies and polygenic risk scores for skin cancer: clinically useful yet?皮肤癌的全基因组关联研究和多基因风险评分:目前在临床上有用吗?
Br J Dermatol. 2019 Dec;181(6):1146-1155. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17917. Epub 2019 Jul 7.
7
Higher polygenic risk for melanoma is associated with improved survival in a high ultraviolet radiation setting.黑色素瘤的多基因风险较高与高紫外线辐射环境下的生存改善相关。
J Transl Med. 2022 Sep 5;20(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03613-2.
8
Joint effect of multiple common SNPs predicts melanoma susceptibility.多个常见单核苷酸多态性的联合作用可预测黑色素瘤易感性。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e85642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085642. eCollection 2013.
9
Identification of novel genetic susceptibility loci for calcium-containing kidney stone disease by genome-wide association study and polygenic risk score in a Taiwanese population.通过全基因组关联研究和多基因风险评分在台湾人群中鉴定含钙肾结石病的新型遗传易感性基因座。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Jun 19;52(1):94. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01577-0.
10
Assessing thyroid cancer risk using polygenic risk scores.使用多基因风险评分评估甲状腺癌风险。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 17;117(11):5997-6002. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919976117. Epub 2020 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Polygenic Risk Score Analysis of 37 SNPs Associated with Melanoma Risk in Colombian Population.哥伦比亚人群中与黑色素瘤风险相关的37个单核苷酸多态性的多基因风险评分分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 May 14;26(10):4674. doi: 10.3390/ijms26104674.