Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University Medicine Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau Str. 42a, 17475 Greifswald, Germany.
Department of Orthodontics, University Medicine Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau Str. 42a, 17475 Greifswald, Germany.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Nov 20;60(11):1907. doi: 10.3390/medicina60111907.
: The most recent guidelines and recommendations regarding treatments of dental caries in children are shifting towards evidence-based minimal or non-invasive approaches aiming to preserve the vitality of teeth and potentially reduce the need for dental general anesthesia. This study investigated the treatment recommendations of dentists actively practicing pediatric dentistry in Germany regarding different patient cases with caries in primary teeth. The questionnaire was distributed on paper or online to pediatric dentists and general dentists practicing pediatric dentistry. Five cases of children with dental treatment needs representing a variety of clinical situations were selected for the questionnaire. Considering four different scenarios regarding pain symptoms (yes/no) and cooperation level (good/low) for each case resulted in 20 questions, where the preferred treatment option could be chosen out of 21 options ranging from observation only to extraction with/without different sedation techniques. The answers were categorized into three categories for each case and scenario according to guidelines, recent scientific evidence, and recommendations (recommended, acceptable, or not recommended/contraindicated). : In total, 222 participants responded to the survey (161 female; 72.5%). In 55.2% of the total 4440 answers, the participants chose a "recommended" treatment option, in 16.4% "acceptable", but in 28.4%, a "not recommended" treatment, which ranged for the five cases between 18.7 and 36.1%. While pain and low cooperation levels led to more invasive and justified treatment choices (only 26.3% "not recommended"), less severe scenarios resulted more often in "not recommended" options (pain with good cooperation: 31.0%; or low cooperation without pain: 32.6%). The dentist's age, experience, and educational background did not significantly correlate to choosing "not recommended" treatment options. A child's pain and cooperation level greatly impact the treatment decisions made by dentists, with a risk of too invasive treatment options in low-severity cases. Substantial disparities in treatment recommendations for caries in primary teeth persist among dental practitioners regardless of their age, experience, and educational background.
: 最近关于儿童龋齿治疗的指南和建议正在朝着基于证据的微创或非侵入性方法转变,旨在保留牙齿的活力,并可能减少对牙科全身麻醉的需求。本研究调查了德国积极从事儿科牙科的牙医对患有乳牙龋齿的不同患者病例的治疗建议。该问卷以纸质或在线形式分发给从事儿科牙科的儿科牙医和普通牙医。为问卷选择了五个具有不同临床情况的儿童牙科治疗需求病例。考虑到每个病例的疼痛症状(有/无)和合作水平(好/低)的四种不同情况,总共产生了 20 个问题,其中可以从仅观察到拔牙并辅以不同镇静技术中选择 21 种治疗方案之一。根据指南、最近的科学证据和建议(推荐、可接受或不推荐/禁忌),对每个病例和场景的答案进行了分类。: 共有 222 名参与者对调查做出了回应(161 名女性;72.5%)。在总共 4440 个回答中,55.2%的参与者选择了“推荐”的治疗方案,16.4%选择了“可接受”,但也有 28.4%选择了“不推荐”的治疗方案,这在五个病例中分别为 18.7%至 36.1%。虽然疼痛和合作水平低会导致更具侵入性和合理的治疗选择(只有 26.3%“不推荐”),但不太严重的情况更常导致“不推荐”的选择(疼痛但合作良好:31.0%;或无疼痛但合作水平低:32.6%)。牙医的年龄、经验和教育背景与选择“不推荐”的治疗方案没有显著相关性。儿童的疼痛和合作水平极大地影响了牙医的治疗决策,在低严重程度的情况下,存在过度侵入性治疗方案的风险。无论牙医的年龄、经验和教育背景如何,在乳牙龋齿的治疗建议方面仍然存在很大差异。