Tsai Ming-Hsu, Lee Chung-Han, Wu Aaron Yu-Jen, Lei Yao-Ning, Chen Hung-Shyong, Wu Yu-Ling
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Cheng Shiu University, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan.
Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan.
Materials (Basel). 2024 Nov 7;17(22):5435. doi: 10.3390/ma17225435.
The geometry of implants plays a crucial role in the success of All-on-Four treatments for the lower jaw. This study builds upon prior research by evaluating the biomechanical performance of implant-supported prostheses in full-arch fixed dental restorations, specifically focusing on different implant lengths and connection types in cases of mild atrophic resorption of the mandible. Four groups were analyzed using finite element analysis (FEA): We utilized 13 or 18 mm posterior 17-degree tilting implants, each paired with two kinds of abutment connections. The external hexagon connection (EHC) group utilized 4 mm diameter implants, while the internal hexagon connection (IHC) group employed 4.3 mm diameter implants. A vertical force was applied to the cantilever region located at the distal side of the posterior implant. The maximum stress regions were observed in prosthetic screws and multi-unit abutments (MUAs) across all groups, with the lowest von Mises stress values noted in the bone. Stress peaks for implant screws and fixtures in the 13 mm group were 19.98% and 11.42% lower, respectively, compared to the IHC group. Similarly, in the 18 mm group, stress peaks were reduced by 33.16% and 39.70% for the EHC group compared to the IHC group. The stress levels on all components remained below the ultimate strength of the titanium alloy. For the same implant lengths, the stress in the prosthetic screw, MUAs, implant screw, and implant fixture positions was lower in the EHC group. When implant length was increased, a decrease in stress levels was observed in the implant screw and fixture of the EHC group and only in the implant screw of the IHC group. However, an increase in stress was noted in the prosthetic screw and MUAs for both groups.
种植体的几何形状在下颌骨全口四颗种植治疗的成功中起着至关重要的作用。本研究在先前研究的基础上,评估了全牙弓固定义齿中种植体支持的修复体的生物力学性能,特别关注下颌骨轻度萎缩性吸收情况下不同的种植体长和连接类型。使用有限元分析(FEA)对四组进行了分析:我们使用了13或18毫米的后倾17度种植体,每组均与两种基台连接方式配对。外六角连接(EHC)组使用直径4毫米的种植体,而内六角连接(IHC)组使用直径4.3毫米的种植体。在后部种植体远侧的悬臂区域施加垂直力。在所有组中,假体螺钉和多单位基台(MUA)中观察到最大应力区域,骨中的冯·米塞斯应力值最低。与IHC组相比,13毫米组中种植体螺钉和种植体固定装置的应力峰值分别降低了19.98%和11.42%。同样,在18毫米组中,与IHC组相比,EHC组的应力峰值在种植体螺钉和种植体固定装置处分别降低了33.16%和39.70%。所有部件上的应力水平均低于钛合金的极限强度。对于相同的种植体长,EHC组中假体螺钉、MUA、种植体螺钉和种植体固定装置位置的应力较低。当增加种植体长时,EHC组的种植体螺钉和种植体固定装置中的应力水平降低,而IHC组仅种植体螺钉中的应力水平降低。然而,两组的假体螺钉和MUA中的应力均有所增加。