Upper Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy Utilizing Prone-Position Thoracoscopy for Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers.

Esophagectomy is the mainstay of treatment in esophageal cancer. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) remains a challenging procedure and has been associated with a high rate of complications and mortality. Routine lymphadenectomy includes two-field lymphadenectomy for distal-esophageal or gastroesophageal junction Siewert I-II tumors. Superior mediastinal lymphadenectomy (SML) refers to an extended two-field lymphadenectomy or total mediastinal lymphadenectomy during MIE for cancer. The exact benefits of SML have been the subject of prolonged debate, with no conclusive evidence indicating improved clinical and oncological results. Herein, we aim to present our surgical technique of thoracoscopic SML during MIE in the prone position, with short-term clinical and oncological outcomes. About 150 consecutive patients underwent totally MIE within 3 years period (2016-2019). SML included right-paratracheal nodes and nodes along the right-recurrent laryngeal nerve throughout its mediastinal route in cases of extended two-field lymphadenectomy, as well as left-paratracheal nodes and nodes along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve during total mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Eligible patients underwent SML during two-stage or three-stage MIE. Twenty consecutive patients underwent SML during the study period. The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 0. Pulmonary complications were observed in 16.5% of the patients. There was 1 right recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy noted. The median length of stay was 9 days. The median number of resected lymph nodes was 45, with the median SML nodes count being 8. The median follow-up was 24 months. SML during prone position thoracoscopy for esophageal cancer is safe and feasible, although technically demanding. Minimally invasive esophagectomy with SML may offer meaningful benefits in oncological outcomes without introducing additional significant morbidity. Further comparative studies are needed to better elucidate our results.