Schiavoni Lorenzo, Mattei Alessia, Cuccarelli Martina, Strumia Alessandro, Dominici Carmelo, Nenna Antonio, Aceto Jessica, Palazzo Gloria, Pascarella Giuseppe, Costa Fabio, Cataldo Rita, Agrò Felice Eugenio, Carassiti Massimiliano
Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Unit of Cardiac Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 20;13(22):6984. doi: 10.3390/jcm13226984.
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been widely used as a life support technique in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The use of anticoagulation during ECMO support remains a topic of debate. The primary aim of this study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of using argatroban as an anticoagulant instead of heparin in patients with heparin-associated thrombocytopenia. 40 patients were enrolled and initially treated with unfractionated heparin for anticoagulation during ECMO, composing the UFH group. Twenty-one of these patients experienced a drop in platelet count to below 100,000 cells/mm and, after testing negative for IgG anti-PF4/heparin, the anticoagulation was switched to argatroban, composing the ARG group. Hemorrhagic events were recorded along with blood chemistry parameters. Bleedings were significantly more frequent in the UFH group than in ARG group (58/579 days vs. 21/357 days, = 0.041). No significant differences were observed in hemorrhagic episodes for each bleeding site, except for tracheal stoma (14 vs. 1, = 0.011). No differences in activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) values were found between the two groups (aPTT 42.65 s vs. 44.70 s, = 0.443). Linear regression analysis revealed that the platelet count on day 5 was correlated with the initial platelet count but not with the type of anticoagulant used ( = 0.001, CI 0.55, 0.69 and = 0.078). Linear regression analysis in both groups showed a correlation between the duration of ECMO support and intensive care unit stay for the median aPTT and median platelet count. Furthermore, no major systemic thrombotic events or circuit clotting were observed in this patient cohort. Argatroban seems to be safe in patients with persistent heparin-associated thrombocytopenia undergoing ECMO.
体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)已被广泛用作新型冠状病毒肺炎急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的生命支持技术。在ECMO支持期间使用抗凝剂仍是一个有争议的话题。本研究的主要目的是证明在肝素相关血小板减少症患者中使用阿加曲班替代肝素作为抗凝剂的安全性和有效性。40例患者入组,最初在ECMO期间使用普通肝素进行抗凝治疗,组成UFH组。其中21例患者血小板计数降至100,000个细胞/mm以下,在IgG抗PF4/肝素检测为阴性后,抗凝治疗改为阿加曲班,组成ARG组。记录出血事件以及血液化学参数。UFH组出血事件明显比ARG组更频繁(58/579天对21/357天,P = 0.041)。除气管造口外,各出血部位的出血事件未观察到显著差异(14对1,P = 0.011)。两组活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)值无差异(aPTT 42.65秒对44.70秒,P = 0.443)。线性回归分析显示,第5天的血小板计数与初始血小板计数相关,但与所用抗凝剂类型无关(P = 0.001,CI 0.55,0.69和P = 0.078)。两组的线性回归分析均显示,ECMO支持时间与重症监护病房停留时间之间存在相关性,以中位数aPTT和中位数血小板计数表示。此外,在该患者队列中未观察到重大全身性血栓事件或体外循环凝血。对于接受ECMO的持续性肝素相关血小板减少症患者,阿加曲班似乎是安全的。