Johnson Kelly C, LeBlanc Allen J, Dolezal Curtis, Singh Anneliese A, Bockting Walter O
Yale University.
San Francisco State University.
Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2024 Sep;11(3):413-424. doi: 10.1037/sgd0000621. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
This study examines the experience of a unique minority stressor, gender identity invalidation (henceforth referred to as invalidation), which is defined as the refusal to accept someone's gender identity as real or valid, among transgender and nonbinary (TNB) individuals. Data are drawn from a large and diverse sample of TNB adults who participated in a quantitative survey concerning transgender identity, minority stress, and mental health ( = 302). Invalidation was assessed using a novel 17-item scale that ascertains the extent to which respondents experienced invalidation across different social contexts. On average, TNB adults in this sample report low levels of invalidation, although a minority experience it at relatively high levels. Experiences of invalidation were significantly higher among nonbinary participants when compared with their binary trans peers. A series of multivariate regression models that control for sociodemographic factors (sex assigned at birth, race/ethnicity, education, age, and income) and well-established indicators of minority stress (felt stigma, enacted stigma) suggest that nonbinary gender identity is independently associated with poor mental health (assessed with the Global Severity Index), and that this association is mediated by invalidation. These findings suggest that invalidation, which is largely unexamined in existing research, merits greater attention as a particularly salient minority stressor influencing mental health among gender diverse populations, nonbinary populations in particular.
本研究考察了一种独特的少数群体压力源——性别认同否定(以下简称“否定”)的情况,该压力源被定义为拒绝接受某人的性别认同为真实或有效的,研究对象为跨性别者和非二元性别者(TNB)。数据来自参与一项关于跨性别身份、少数群体压力和心理健康的定量调查的大量且多样化的TNB成年人样本(n = 302)。使用一个新的17项量表来评估否定情况,该量表确定了受访者在不同社会环境中经历否定的程度。平均而言,该样本中的TNB成年人报告的否定程度较低,尽管少数人经历的否定程度相对较高。与二元跨性别同龄人相比,非二元性别参与者的否定经历显著更高。一系列控制社会人口学因素(出生时被指定的性别、种族/民族、教育程度、年龄和收入)以及既定的少数群体压力指标(感知到的耻辱、遭受的耻辱)的多元回归模型表明,非二元性别认同与心理健康不佳(用全球严重指数评估)独立相关,并且这种关联是由否定介导的。这些发现表明,否定在现有研究中基本未被审视,作为影响性别多样化人群,特别是非二元性别人群心理健康的一个特别突出的少数群体压力源,值得更多关注。