• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因果推断方法。第1部分:因果图与混杂因素。

Methods in causal inference. Part 1: causal diagrams and confounding.

作者信息

Bulbulia Joseph A

机构信息

Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

Evol Hum Sci. 2024 Sep 27;6:e40. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2024.35. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1017/ehs.2024.35
PMID:39600624
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11588567/
Abstract

Causal inference requires contrasting counterfactual states under specified interventions. Obtaining these contrasts from data depends on explicit assumptions and careful, multi-step workflows. Causal diagrams are crucial for clarifying the identifiability of counterfactual contrasts from data. Here, I explain how to use causal directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to determine if and how causal effects can be identified from non-experimental observational data, offering practical reporting tips and suggestions to avoid common pitfalls.

摘要

因果推断需要在特定干预下对比反事实状态。从数据中获取这些对比取决于明确的假设和细致的多步骤工作流程。因果图对于阐明从数据中识别反事实对比的可识别性至关重要。在此,我将解释如何使用因果有向无环图(DAG)来确定是否以及如何从非实验性观察数据中识别因果效应,并提供实用的报告提示和建议以避免常见陷阱。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f7/11588567/bab214ab9fa2/S2513843X24000355_figAb.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f7/11588567/bab214ab9fa2/S2513843X24000355_figAb.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7f7/11588567/bab214ab9fa2/S2513843X24000355_figAb.jpg

相似文献

1
Methods in causal inference. Part 1: causal diagrams and confounding.因果推断方法。第1部分:因果图与混杂因素。
Evol Hum Sci. 2024 Sep 27;6:e40. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2024.35. eCollection 2024.
2
Causal Diagrams: Pitfalls and Tips.因果图:陷阱与技巧。
J Epidemiol. 2020 Apr 5;30(4):153-162. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20190192. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
3
Directed acyclic graphs for clinical research: a tutorial.临床研究中的有向无环图:教程
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2023 Sep 15;26(3):97-107. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.97.
4
Evidence synthesis for constructing directed acyclic graphs (ESC-DAGs): a novel and systematic method for building directed acyclic graphs.证据综合构建有向无环图(ESC-DAGs):一种构建有向无环图的新颖而系统的方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Feb 1;49(1):322-329. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz150.
5
Directed Acyclic Graphs in Decision-Analytic Modeling: Bridging Causal Inference and Effective Model Design in Medical Decision Making.决策分析建模中的有向无环图:在医疗决策中架起因果推理与有效模型设计的桥梁
Med Decis Making. 2025 Apr;45(3):223-231. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241310898. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
6
[Causal Inference in Medicine Part II. Directed acyclic graphs--a useful method for confounder selection, categorization of potential biases, and hypothesis specification].[医学中的因果推断 第二部分。有向无环图——一种用于选择混杂因素、潜在偏倚分类和假设设定的有用方法]
Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2009 Sep;64(4):796-805. doi: 10.1265/jjh.64.796.
7
Causal inference in cumulative risk assessment: The roles of directed acyclic graphs.累积风险评估中的因果推断:有向无环图的作用。
Environ Int. 2017 May;102:30-41. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
8
Reducing bias in experimental ecology through directed acyclic graphs.通过有向无环图减少实验生态学中的偏差。
Ecol Evol. 2023 Mar 28;13(3):e9947. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9947. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
Compartmental Model Diagrams as Causal Representations in Relation to DAGs.作为与有向无环图相关的因果表示的房室模型图。
Epidemiol Methods. 2017 Dec;6(1). doi: 10.1515/em-2016-0007. Epub 2017 May 5.
10
Using causal diagrams within the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework to evaluate confounding adjustment in observational studies.在推荐评估、发展和评估框架内使用因果图来评估观察性研究中的混杂调整。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Nov;175:111532. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111532. Epub 2024 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of causal forest double machine learning (DML) approach to assess tuberculosis preventive therapy's impact on ART adherence.应用因果森林双机器学习(DML)方法评估结核病预防性治疗对艾滋病抗病毒治疗依从性的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 9;15(1):29130. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14460-8.
2
Religious centrality across 22 countries.22个国家的宗教中心地位。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 30;15(1):15081. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99183-6.