Soundararajan Suchithra S, Farid Shaik
Radiology, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Chennai, IND.
Radiodiagnosis, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Chennai, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Oct 27;16(10):e72497. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72497. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Background Accurate diagnosis of rotator cuff pathologies is crucial for the effective management of shoulder pain. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution USG and MRI for detecting rotator cuff injuries. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 40 patients with shoulder pain who underwent both USG and MRI over six months at the Department of Radiodiagnosis, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre in Chennai, India, in collaboration with the Department of Orthopedics. The diagnostic accuracy metrics of USG were compared to those of MRI, considered the reference standard, and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0 (Released 2021; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results The mean age of the 40 patients was 46.12 ± 15.31 years. Among them, males represented the majority (n = 27, 67.5%), with a significant number having diabetes mellitus (n = 14, 35%) and hypertension (n = 9, 22.5%). The right shoulder was the most frequently affected (n = 33, 82.5%). USG identified supraspinatus tears in 33 patients (82.5%), subscapularis tears in 16 patients (40.0%), and infraspinatus tears in two patients (5.0%). MRI detected supraspinatus tears in 39 patients (97.5%), subscapularis tears in 18 patients (45.0%), and infraspinatus tears in two patients (5.0%). The diagnostic performance of USG demonstrated a sensitivity of 76.92% and specificity of 85.71%, while MRI exhibited a sensitivity of 92.86% and specificity of 80.77%. Conclusions Both USG and MRI are valuable for diagnosing rotator cuff pathologies, and MRI provides superior sensitivity and specificity. However, USG remains a reliable and cost-effective initial diagnostic tool, particularly when used in conjunction with MRI for comprehensive assessment.
背景 准确诊断肩袖病变对于有效管理肩部疼痛至关重要。本研究旨在评估高分辨率超声(USG)和磁共振成像(MRI)检测肩袖损伤的诊断准确性。方法 对印度钦奈卡尔帕加·维奈亚加医学科学与研究中心放射诊断科与骨科合作,在六个月内接受了USG和MRI检查的40例肩部疼痛患者进行了一项回顾性研究。将USG的诊断准确性指标与被视为参考标准的MRI的指标进行比较,并使用IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows 28.0版(2021年发布;IBM公司,美国纽约州阿蒙克)进行分析。结果 40例患者的平均年龄为46.12±15.31岁。其中,男性占大多数(n = 27,67.5%),相当一部分患有糖尿病(n = 14,35%)和高血压(n = 9,22.5%)。右肩是最常受累的部位(n = 33,82.5%)。USG在33例患者(82.5%)中发现了冈上肌撕裂,在16例患者(40.0%)中发现了肩胛下肌撕裂,在2例患者(5.0%)中发现了冈下肌撕裂。MRI在39例患者(97.5%)中检测到冈上肌撕裂,在18例患者(45.0%)中检测到肩胛下肌撕裂,在2例患者(5.0%)中检测到冈下肌撕裂。USG的诊断性能显示敏感性为76.92%,特异性为85.71%,而MRI的敏感性为92.86%,特异性为80.77%。结论 USG和MRI对于诊断肩袖病变都很有价值,且MRI具有更高的敏感性和特异性。然而,USG仍然是一种可靠且具有成本效益的初始诊断工具,特别是与MRI联合用于综合评估时。