Suppr超能文献

超声检查(USG)和磁共振成像(MRI)检测肩袖损伤的诊断准确性

Diagnostic Accuracy of USG and MRI for the Detection of Rotator Cuff Injury.

作者信息

Madhavi P, Patil Prakash

机构信息

Department of Radiodiagnosis, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Aug 30;16(8):e68199. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68199. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Rotator cuff disease frequently causes shoulder pain and is diagnosed using various radiological methods alongside history and physical examination. Arthrography has traditionally been employed for this purpose, but newer non-invasive techniques such as ultrasonography (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are increasingly used. However, no single method is universally agreed upon as the best diagnostic tool, each having its own limitations.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate how effectively ultrasound and MRI can diagnose rotator cuff tears.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy patients suspected of having a rotator cuff tear underwent investigations at the Radiology Department of Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad. USG and MRI examinations were done on the same day, along with a detailed history. USG was conducted using a GE LOGIQ P9 machine with a high-frequency 3-12 MHz transducer. MRI was conducted using a 1.5T Siemens Magnetom Avanto scanner.

RESULTS

Pain and stiffness are the most common complaints in rotator cuff tears. The predisposing factors include male predominance, increasing age, dominant hand use, and trauma history. The supraspinatus tendon is the most frequently injured, with partial tears, especially articular surface tears, being more common than full-thickness tears. Clinical examinations, USG, and MRI are valuable in diagnosing rotator cuff tears.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that USG may not be as reliable in detecting rotator cuff tears as once believed. A positive ultrasound result is more trustworthy than a negative one. In contrast, MRI demonstrates greater sensitivity and overall diagnostic accuracy compared to both ultrasonography and clinical assessment for detecting rotator cuff tears.

摘要

引言

肩袖疾病常导致肩部疼痛,需结合病史和体格检查,使用多种放射学方法进行诊断。传统上一直采用关节造影术来达到这一目的,但诸如超声检查(USG)和磁共振成像(MRI)等更新的非侵入性技术正越来越多地被使用。然而,没有一种单一方法被普遍认为是最佳诊断工具,每种方法都有其自身的局限性。

目的

评估超声和MRI诊断肩袖撕裂的有效性。

材料与方法

70例疑似肩袖撕裂的患者在卡拉德的克里希纳维什瓦维迪亚佩特(被视为大学)放射科接受检查。在同一天进行了USG和MRI检查,并记录了详细病史。使用配备高频3 - 12 MHz探头的GE LOGIQ P9机器进行USG检查。使用1.5T西门子Magnetom Avanto扫描仪进行MRI检查。

结果

疼痛和僵硬是肩袖撕裂最常见的症状。诱发因素包括男性居多、年龄增长、惯用手以及外伤史。冈上肌腱是最常受伤的部位,部分撕裂,尤其是关节面撕裂,比全层撕裂更为常见。临床检查、USG和MRI在诊断肩袖撕裂方面都很有价值。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,USG在检测肩袖撕裂方面可能不像曾经认为的那样可靠。超声检查结果呈阳性比阴性更值得信赖。相比之下,在检测肩袖撕裂方面,MRI比超声检查和临床评估都具有更高的敏感性和总体诊断准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf8f/11440012/37b37d0364b1/cureus-0016-00000068199-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验