Abu Hammour Adnan, Hammour Khawla Abu, Alhamad Hamza, Nassar Razan, El-Dahiyat Faris, Sawaqed Majd, Allan Aya, Manaseer Qusai, Abu Hammour Mohammad, Halboup Abdulsalam, Farha Rana Abu
Internal Medicine Department, Jordan University Hospital, Amman, Jordan.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biopharmaceutics, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Nov 25;17(1):2429000. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2429000. eCollection 2024.
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT into medical education is expanding, offering benefits such as efficient information synthesis. However, concerns about the accuracy, reliability, and proper use of these tools persist. Understanding medical students' perceptions of ChatGPT is crucial for optimising its use in educational settings.
To evaluate how medical students perceive ChatGPT for educational purposes and to assess its perceived advantages and disadvantages.
A cross-sectional study was carried out using a questionnaire with five main domains to explore Jordanian medical students' perceptions, practices, and concerns regarding the ChatGPT. This study was conducted from May to July, 2023, and the data were collected using the convenience sampling technique through Google Forms shared within medical students' Facebook groups. Descriptive statistics summarised participant demographics, while logistic regression identified factors influencing ChatGPT usage. Variables with a -value ≤ 0.05 in multiple regression were considered statistically significant.
Nearly two-thirds (N = 136, 61.5%) claimed to have knowledge of AI but not in clinical settings. Most participants (88.5%, N = 216) were aware of ChatGPT, with 86.9% (N = 212) agreeing that 'Medical students can benefit from using ChatGPT.' Additionally, 83.2% (N = 203) felt that 'ChatGPT helps students quickly and easily summarize complex information.' Conversely, 78.3% (N = 191) expressed concerns about ChatGPT's potential inaccuracies, with accuracy and reliability cited as primary concerns. Multiple logistic regression showed that younger students (OR = 0.902, = 0.025) and those with lower proficiency (OR = 0.487, = 0.007) used ChatGPT more frequently than others.
Although the use of the ChatGPT could be more beneficial for aiding students in developing medical knowledge, evidence-based academic regulations should guide its use. Future research should be conducted to examine the enablers and barriers to ChatGPT use in medical education.
像ChatGPT这样的人工智能工具融入医学教育的情况正在不断扩大,带来了高效信息整合等益处。然而,对这些工具的准确性、可靠性及正确使用的担忧依然存在。了解医学生对ChatGPT的看法对于在教育环境中优化其使用至关重要。
评估医学生如何看待将ChatGPT用于教育目的,并评估其 perceived 优势和劣势。
采用一项横断面研究,使用一份包含五个主要领域的问卷来探究约旦医学生对ChatGPT的看法、做法及担忧。本研究于2023年5月至7月进行,通过在医学生脸书群组中分享的谷歌表单,使用便利抽样技术收集数据。描述性统计总结了参与者的人口统计学特征,而逻辑回归确定了影响ChatGPT使用的因素。多元回归中p值≤0.05的变量被认为具有统计学意义。
近三分之二(N = 136,61.5%)的人声称了解人工智能,但并非在临床环境中。大多数参与者(88.5%,N = 216)知晓ChatGPT,其中86.9%(N = 212)同意“医学生可以从使用ChatGPT中受益”。此外,83.2%(N = 203)认为“ChatGPT帮助学生快速轻松地总结复杂信息”。相反,78.3%(N = 191)对ChatGPT可能存在的不准确表示担忧,准确性和可靠性被列为主要担忧。多元逻辑回归显示,较年轻的学生(OR = 0.902,p = 0.025)和熟练程度较低的学生(OR = 0.487,p = 0.007)比其他人更频繁地使用ChatGPT。
尽管使用ChatGPT可能对帮助学生发展医学知识更有益,但基于证据的学术规范应指导其使用。未来应开展研究,以考察在医学教育中使用ChatGPT的促进因素和障碍。