Kang Jeehoon, Chung Jaewook, Park Kyung Woo, Bae Jang-Whan, Lee Huijin, Hwang Doyeon, Yang Han-Mo, Han Kyoo-Rok, Moon Keon-Woong, Kim Ung, Rhee Moo-Yong, Kim Doo-Il, Kim Song-Yi, Lee Sung-Yun, Lee Seung Uk, Kim Sang-Wook, Kim Seok Yeon, Han Jung-Kyu, Shin Eun-Seok, Koo Bon-Kwon, Kim Hyo-Soo
Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.
JAMA Cardiol. 2025 May 1;10(5):427-436. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4030.
Antiplatelet monotherapy in the chronic maintenance period for patients with high bleeding risk (HBR) and those who have undergone complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not yet been explored.
To compare clopidogrel vs aspirin monotherapy in patients with HBR and/or PCI complexity.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This post hoc analysis of the multicenter HOST-EXAM Extended study, an open-label trial conducted across 37 sites in South Korea, enrolled patients from 2014 to 2018 with up to 5.9 years of follow-up. The analysis was conducted from February to November 2023. Patients who maintained dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) event-free for 6 to 18 months following PCI were included.
Patients were randomized to receive either clopidogrel or aspirin in a 1:1 ratio. Those with sufficient data to assess HBR or complex PCI were analyzed.
Coprimary end points were thrombotic composite end point (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, readmission due to acute coronary syndrome, and definite/probable stent thrombosis) and any bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2 to 5).
Of 3974 patients included (mean [SD] age, 63.4 [10.7] years; 2976 male [74.9%]), 866 had HBR (21.8%), and 849 underwent complex PCI (21.4%). Clopidogrel as compared with aspirin was associated with lower rates of thrombotic and bleeding events regardless of HBR and/or PCI complexity. For the thrombotic composite end point, the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.53-1.04) among HBR vs 0.62 (95% CI, 0.48-0.80) among patients without HBR (P for interaction = 0.38) and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.32-0.77) among patients with complex PCI vs 0.74 (95% CI, 0.59-0.92) among patients with noncomplex PCI (P for interaction = 0.12). The reduction in bleeding by clopidogrel compared with aspirin was consistent among both patients with HBR (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.56-1.21) and patients without HBR (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40-0.85; P for interaction = 0.20) and among patients undergoing complex PCI (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.47-1.33) vs noncomplex PCI (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.93; P for interaction = 0.62).
In this study, in patients who experienced PCI and were event-free during 6 to 18 months of DAPT, the beneficial impact of clopidogrel monotherapy over aspirin monotherapy was consistent, regardless of bleeding risk and/or PCI complexity.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02044250.
高出血风险(HBR)患者以及接受复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者在慢性维持期的抗血小板单药治疗尚未得到研究。
比较氯吡格雷与阿司匹林单药治疗在HBR和/或PCI复杂性患者中的疗效。
设计、地点和参与者:这项对多中心HOST-EXAM扩展研究的事后分析,是一项在韩国37个地点进行的开放标签试验,纳入了2014年至2018年的患者,随访时间长达5.9年。分析于2023年2月至11月进行。纳入PCI术后6至18个月维持双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)无事件发生的患者。
患者按1:1比例随机接受氯吡格雷或阿司匹林治疗。对有足够数据评估HBR或复杂PCI的患者进行分析。
共同主要终点为血栓形成复合终点(心血管死亡、非致命性心肌梗死、中风、因急性冠状动脉综合征再次入院以及明确/可能的支架血栓形成)和任何出血(出血学术研究联盟2至5型)。
在纳入的3974例患者中(平均[标准差]年龄,63.4[10.7]岁;2976例男性[74.9%]),866例有HBR(21.8%),849例接受了复杂PCI(21.4%)。无论HBR和/或PCI复杂性如何,与阿司匹林相比,氯吡格雷的血栓形成和出血事件发生率较低。对于血栓形成复合终点,HBR患者的风险比(HR)为0.75(95%CI,0.53 - 1.04),无HBR患者为0.62(95%CI,0.48 - 0.80)(交互作用P值 = 0.38);复杂PCI患者为0.49(95%CI,0.32 - 0.77),非复杂PCI患者为0.74(95%CI,0.59 - 0.92)(交互作用P值 = 0.12)。与阿司匹林相比,氯吡格雷在HBR患者(HR,0.82;95%CI,0.56 - 1.21)和无HBR患者(HR,0.58;95%CI,0.40 - 0.85;交互作用P值 = 0.20)以及接受复杂PCI患者(HR,0.79;95%CI,0.47 - 1.33)与非复杂PCI患者(HR,0.68;95%CI,0.50 - 0.93;交互作用P值 = 0.62)中减少出血的效果一致。
在本研究中,对于经历PCI且在DAPT的6至18个月内无事件发生的患者,无论出血风险和/或PCI复杂性如何,氯吡格雷单药治疗优于阿司匹林单药治疗的有益影响是一致的。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02044250。