• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测数字化戒烟干预中的早期辍学:复制与扩展研究。

Predicting Early Dropout in a Digital Tobacco Cessation Intervention: Replication and Extension Study.

机构信息

Innovations Center, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, United States.

Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 27;26:e54248. doi: 10.2196/54248.

DOI:10.2196/54248
PMID:39602788
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11635322/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Detecting early dropout from digital interventions is crucial for developing strategies to enhance user retention and improve health-related behavioral outcomes. Bricker and colleagues proposed a single metric that accurately predicted early dropout from 4 digital tobacco cessation interventions based on log-in data in the initial week after registration. Generalization of this method to additional interventions and modalities would strengthen confidence in the approach and facilitate additional research drawing on it to increase user retention.

OBJECTIVE

This study had two research questions (RQ): RQ1-can the study by Bricker and colleagues be replicated using data from a large-scale observational, multimodal intervention to predict early dropout? and RQ2-can first-week engagement patterns identify users at the greatest risk for early dropout, to inform development of potential "rescue" interventions?

METHODS

Data from web users were drawn from EX, a freely available, multimodal digital intervention for tobacco cessation (N=70,265). First-week engagement was operationalized as any website page views or SMS text message responses within 1 week after registration. Early dropout was defined as having no subsequent engagement after that initial week through 1 year. First, a multivariate regression model was used to predict early dropout. Model predictors were dichotomous measures of engagement in each of the initial 6 days (days 2-7) following registration (day 1). Next, 6 univariate regression models were compared in terms of their discrimination ability to predict early dropout. The sole predictor of each model was a dichotomous measure of whether users had reengaged with the intervention by a particular day of the first week (calculated separately for each of 2-7 days).

RESULTS

For RQ1, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the multivariate model in predicting dropout after 1 week was 0.72 (95% CI 0.71-0.73), which was within the range of AUC metrics found in the study by Bricker and colleagues. For RQ2, the AUCs of the univariate models increased with each successive day until day 4 (0.66, 95% CI 0.65-0.67). The sensitivity of the models decreased (range 0.79-0.59) and the specificity increased (range 0.48-0.73) with each successive day.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides independent validation of the use of first-week engagement to predict early dropout, demonstrating that the method generalizes across intervention modalities and engagement metrics. As digital intervention researchers continue to address the challenges of low engagement and early dropout, these results suggest that first-week engagement is a useful construct with predictive validity that is robust across interventions and definitions. Future research should explore the applicability and efficiency of this model to develop interventions to increase retention and improve health behavioral outcomes.

摘要

背景

及早发现数字干预措施的使用者流失对于制定策略以提高用户留存率和改善与健康相关的行为结果至关重要。Bricker 及其同事提出了一种单一指标,该指标可根据注册后第一周内的登录数据准确预测 4 项数字戒烟干预措施的早期使用者流失情况。将该方法推广到其他干预措施和模式中,将增强对该方法的信心,并促进利用该方法进行更多的研究,以提高用户留存率。

目的

本研究有两个研究问题(RQ):RQ1-是否可以使用大规模观察性、多模式干预措施的数据来复制 Bricker 及其同事的研究,以预测早期使用者流失?RQ2-第一周的参与模式是否可以识别出最有可能早期流失的用户,以告知潜在“挽救”干预措施的开发?

方法

从 EX(一个免费的、多模式的戒烟数字干预措施)的网络用户中提取数据(N=70265)。第一周的参与度被定义为注册后 1 周内的任何网站页面浏览量或短信回复。早期流失被定义为在初始周后至 1 年内没有后续参与。首先,使用多元回归模型预测早期流失。模型预测因子是注册后第 2-7 天(第 1 天)中每日参与情况的二分测量值。接下来,根据预测早期流失的能力比较了 6 个单变量回归模型。每个模型的唯一预测因子是第 1 周内特定某一天用户是否重新参与干预措施的二分测量值(分别为第 2-7 天中的每一天计算)。

结果

对于 RQ1,多变量模型预测 1 周后辍学的受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下面积为 0.72(95%CI 0.71-0.73),这在 Bricker 及其同事的研究中发现的 AUC 指标范围内。对于 RQ2,单变量模型的 AUC 随着第 1 天的推移而增加,直到第 4 天(0.66,95%CI 0.65-0.67)。模型的灵敏度(范围为 0.79-0.59)随着第 1 天的推移而降低,特异性(范围为 0.48-0.73)随着第 1 天的推移而增加。

结论

本研究对使用第一周的参与度来预测早期流失进行了独立验证,证明了该方法在干预措施和参与度指标上具有普遍性。随着数字干预研究人员继续应对低参与度和早期流失的挑战,这些结果表明,第一周的参与度是一种有用的具有预测有效性的构建,在各种干预措施和定义中都是稳健的。未来的研究应该探讨该模型的适用性和效率,以开发提高留存率和改善健康行为结果的干预措施。

相似文献

1
Predicting Early Dropout in a Digital Tobacco Cessation Intervention: Replication and Extension Study.预测数字化戒烟干预中的早期辍学:复制与扩展研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 27;26:e54248. doi: 10.2196/54248.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.计算机和其他电子戒烟辅助手段的有效性和成本效益:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(38):1-205, iii-v. doi: 10.3310/hta16380.
4
Differences in the effectiveness of individual-level smoking cessation interventions by socioeconomic status.个体层面戒烟干预措施的有效性在社会经济地位方面的差异。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 27;1(1):CD015120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015120.pub2.
5
Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use.减少持续吸烟危害的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 13;10(10):CD005231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005231.pub3.
6
Interventions for waterpipe smoking cessation.水烟戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 31;2015(7):CD005549. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005549.pub3.
7
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的计算机和移动技术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 23;5(5):CD011425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2.
8
Mobile phone messaging for preventive health care.用于预防性医疗保健的手机短信服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007457. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007457.pub2.
9
Interventions to increase adherence to medications for tobacco dependence.提高烟草依赖药物依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 23(2):CD009164. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009164.pub2.
10
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of eHealth Smoking Cessation Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.电子健康戒烟干预措施的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 28;25:e45111. doi: 10.2196/45111.
2
Can a Single Variable Predict Early Dropout From Digital Health Interventions? Comparison of Predictive Models From Two Large Randomized Trials.单一变量能否预测数字健康干预的早期辍学?来自两项大型随机试验的预测模型比较。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 20;25:e43629. doi: 10.2196/43629.
3
Smoking Cessation Smartphone App Use Over Time: Predicting 12-Month Cessation Outcomes in a 2-Arm Randomized Trial.随时间推移的戒烟智能手机应用程序使用情况:在一项 2 臂随机试验中预测 12 个月的戒烟结果。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 18;24(8):e39208. doi: 10.2196/39208.
4
Challenges in Participant Engagement and Retention Using Mobile Health Apps: Literature Review.使用移动健康应用程序在参与者参与度和留存率方面面临的挑战:文献综述
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 26;24(4):e35120. doi: 10.2196/35120.
5
Effectiveness of an optimized text message and Internet intervention for smoking cessation: A randomized controlled trial.优化短信和互联网干预措施对戒烟效果的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2022 Apr;117(4):1035-1046. doi: 10.1111/add.15677. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
6
Text2Connect: a health system approach to engage tobacco users in quitline cessation services via text messaging.Text2Connect:一种通过短信让烟草使用者参与戒烟热线戒烟服务的卫生系统方法。
Transl Behav Med. 2020 Feb 3;10(1):292-301. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibz033.
7
Geographic Representativeness of a Web-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention: Reach Equity Analysis.基于网络的戒烟干预措施的地理代表性:覆盖公平性分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 24;20(10):e11668. doi: 10.2196/11668.
8
Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smartphone apps: evidence, theory and improvements.临床综述:精神健康智能手机应用程序的用户参与情况:证据、理论与改进。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 Aug;21(3):116-119. doi: 10.1136/eb-2018-102891. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
9
Improving Adherence to Smoking Cessation Treatment: Intervention Effects in a Web-Based Randomized Trial.提高戒烟治疗的依从性:基于网络的随机试验中的干预效果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Mar 1;19(3):324-332. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw282.
10
Baseline Motivation Type as a Predictor of Dropout in a Healthy Eating Text Messaging Program.基线动机类型对健康饮食短信计划辍学的预测作用。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Sep 29;4(3):e114. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5992.