Souza Victor H, Nieminen Jaakko O, Tugin Sergei, Koponen Lari M, Ziemann Ulf, Baffa Oswaldo, Ilmoniemi Risto J
Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Aalto University, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Physics, Faculty of Philosophy, Sciences and Letters at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Aalto University, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2025 Jan;169:23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.11.004. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
Electric-field orientation is crucial for optimizing neuronal excitation in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Yet, the stimulus orientation effects on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) are poorly understood due to technical challenges in manipulating the TMS-induced stimulus orientation within milliseconds. We aimed to assess the orientation sensitivity of SICI and ICF paradigms and identify optimal orientations for motor evoked potential (MEP) facilitation and suppression.
We applied paired-pulse multi-channel TMS to 12 healthy subjects with conditioning and test stimuli in the same, opposite, and perpendicular orientations to each other at four interstimulus intervals (ISI) to generate refractoriness, SICI, and ICF.
MEP modulation was affected by the conditioning- and test-stimulus orientation, being strongest when both pulses were in the same direction. MEP modulation with 2.5-ms and 6.0-ms ISIs were more sensitive to orientation changes than 0.5- and 8.0-ms ISIs.
SICI and ICF orientation sensitivity exhibit a complex dependence on the conditioning stimulus orientation, which might be explained by anatomical and morphological arrangements of inhibitory and excitatory neuronal populations.
Distinct mechanisms mediating SICI and ICF are sensitive to stimulus orientation at specific ISIs, describing a structural-functional relationship that maximizes each effect at the cortical level.
电场方向对于优化经颅磁刺激(TMS)中的神经元兴奋至关重要。然而,由于在毫秒级内操纵TMS诱导的刺激方向存在技术挑战,刺激方向对短间隔皮质内抑制(SICI)和皮质内易化(ICF)的影响尚不清楚。我们旨在评估SICI和ICF范式的方向敏感性,并确定运动诱发电位(MEP)易化和抑制的最佳方向。
我们对12名健康受试者应用配对脉冲多通道TMS,在四个刺激间隔(ISI)下,以相同、相反和相互垂直的方向施加条件刺激和测试刺激,以产生不应期、SICI和ICF。
MEP调制受条件刺激和测试刺激方向的影响,当两个脉冲方向相同时最强。与0.5毫秒和8.0毫秒的ISI相比,2.5毫秒和6.0毫秒的ISI下的MEP调制对方向变化更敏感。
SICI和ICF方向敏感性对条件刺激方向表现出复杂的依赖性,这可能由抑制性和兴奋性神经元群体的解剖和形态学排列来解释。
介导SICI和ICF的不同机制在特定ISI下对刺激方向敏感,描述了一种在皮质水平上使每种效应最大化的结构-功能关系。