Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland.
BioMag Laboratory, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, HUS Medical Imaging Centre, Helsinki, Finland.
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 22;16(9):e0257554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257554. eCollection 2021.
Besides stimulus intensities and interstimulus intervals (ISI), the electric field (E-field) orientation is known to affect both short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and facilitation (SICF) in paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). However, it has yet to be established how distinct orientations of the conditioning (CS) and test stimuli (TS) affect the SICI and SICF generation. With the use of a multi-channel TMS transducer that provides electronic control of the stimulus orientation and intensity, we aimed to investigate how changes in the CS and TS orientation affect the strength of SICI and SICF. We hypothesized that the CS orientation would play a major role for SICF than for SICI, whereas the CS intensity would be more critical for SICI than for SICF. In eight healthy subjects, we tested two ISIs (1.5 and 2.7 ms), two CS and TS orientations (anteromedial (AM) and posteromedial (PM)), and four CS intensities (50, 70, 90, and 110% of the resting motor threshold (RMT)). The TS intensity was fixed at 110% RMT. The intensities were adjusted to the corresponding RMT in the AM and PM orientations. SICI and SICF were observed in all tested CS and TS orientations. SICI depended on the CS intensity in a U-shaped manner in any combination of the CS and TS orientations. With 70% and 90% RMT CS intensities, stronger PM-oriented CS induced stronger inhibition than weaker AM-oriented CS. Similar SICF was observed for any CS orientation. Neither SICI nor SICF depended on the TS orientation. We demonstrated that SICI and SICF could be elicited by the CS perpendicular to the TS, which indicates that these stimuli affected either overlapping or strongly connected neuronal populations. We concluded that SICI is primarily sensitive to the CS intensity and that CS intensity adjustment resulted in similar SICF for different CS orientations.
除了刺激强度和刺激间隔(ISI),电场(E-field)方向已知会影响成对经颅磁刺激(TMS)中的短间隔皮质内抑制(SICI)和易化(SICF)。然而,不同的刺激(CS)和测试刺激(TS)方向如何影响 SICI 和 SICF 的产生尚不清楚。我们使用多通道 TMS 换能器,该换能器可以电子控制刺激方向和强度,旨在研究 CS 和 TS 方向的变化如何影响 SICI 和 SICF 的强度。我们假设 CS 方向对 SICF 的影响比对 SICI 的影响更大,而 CS 强度对 SICI 的影响比对 SICF 的影响更大。在八名健康受试者中,我们测试了两个 ISI(1.5 和 2.7 ms)、两个 CS 和 TS 方向(前内侧(AM)和后内侧(PM))以及四个 CS 强度(50、70、90 和 110%的静息运动阈值(RMT))。TS 强度固定为 110% RMT。在 AM 和 PM 方向上,将强度调整至相应的 RMT。在所有测试的 CS 和 TS 方向上都观察到 SICI 和 SICF。SICI 取决于 CS 强度,在 CS 和 TS 方向的任何组合中均呈 U 形。在使用 70%和 90% RMT CS 强度时,较强的 PM 定向 CS 比较弱的 AM 定向 CS 引起更强的抑制。对于任何 CS 方向,都观察到类似的 SICF。SICI 和 SICF 既不依赖于 CS 方向,也不依赖于 TS 方向。我们证明了垂直于 TS 的 CS 可以引发 SICI 和 SICF,这表明这些刺激影响重叠或连接紧密的神经元群体。我们得出结论,SICI 主要对 CS 强度敏感,CS 强度调整导致不同 CS 方向的 SICF 相似。