Wagenaar Dirk, Habraken Steven J M, Rinaldi Ilaria, Eekers Daniëlle B P, Kramer Miranda, Jaspers Jaap P M, van Gent Dik, Barazzuol Lara, Klaver Yvonne L B, Zindler Jaap, Coremans Ida, Compter Inge, Scandurra Daniel, van der Weide Hiska L, Both Stefan, Hoogeman Mischa, Unipan Mirko, Méndez Romero Alejandra
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Radiother Oncol. 2025 Jan;202:110653. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110653. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
With proton therapy, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) accounts for increased DNA damage caused by higher linear energy transfer (LET) compared to photons. However, the LET and hence the RBE varies along the proton range, particularly at the Bragg peak, introducing challenges in proton treatment planning for brain tumors. The aim of this paper is to standardize evaluating and reporting LET and RBE in proton therapy for patients with grade 2 and 3 IDH mutant gliomas among the Dutch proton therapy centers.
A working group, comprising experts from three Dutch proton therapy centers, conducted nine meetings between 2020 and 2023. A joint literature review supported the standardized evaluation and reporting of LET and RBE. Questionnaires sent out to the three Dutch proton centers in 2020 and 2023 provided input for discussions on clinical practices. Three clinical examples were chosen to illustrate the application of the recommended methodology in treatment planning.
Following the literature review, a guideline on evaluation and reporting using the dose averaged LET (LET) of primary and secondary protons calculated in water normalized to unit density was established. The McNamara variable RBE model with an α/β value of 2 Gy was selected for reporting.
The study presents a harmonization of approaches to evaluating and reporting LET and variable RBE in a guideline for the three Dutch proton therapy centers, providing clarity for future clinical interpretation. Having chosen a single variable RBE model offers practicality, although its accuracy remains a topic of ongoing research.
在质子治疗中,与光子相比,相对生物效应(RBE)考虑了较高线性能量传递(LET)所导致的DNA损伤增加。然而,LET进而RBE会随着质子射程而变化,尤其是在布拉格峰处,这给脑肿瘤的质子治疗计划带来了挑战。本文的目的是在荷兰质子治疗中心中,规范2级和3级异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)突变型胶质瘤患者质子治疗中LET和RBE的评估与报告。
一个由荷兰三个质子治疗中心的专家组成的工作组在2020年至2023年间召开了九次会议。联合文献综述支持了LET和RBE的标准化评估与报告。2020年和2023年向荷兰三个质子中心发放的问卷为临床实践讨论提供了依据。选取了三个临床实例来说明推荐方法在治疗计划中的应用。
经过文献综述,制定了一项评估和报告指南,该指南使用在归一化至单位密度的水中计算的初级和次级质子的剂量平均LET(LET)。选择α/β值为2 Gy的麦克纳马拉可变RBE模型进行报告。
该研究在一项指南中对荷兰三个质子治疗中心评估和报告LET及可变RBE的方法进行了统一,为未来的临床解读提供了清晰的指导。选择单一可变RBE模型具有实用性,尽管其准确性仍是一个正在研究的课题。