Division of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Latina, Italy; Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Italy.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Nov 25;17(22):2639-2663. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.08.027.
Current evidence indicates that dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin plus a P2Y inhibitor is essential for the prevention of thrombotic events after percutaneous coronary interventions. However, dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with increased bleeding which may outweigh the benefits. This has set the foundations for customizing antiplatelet treatments to the individual patient. However, bleeding and ischemic risks are often present in the same patient, making it difficult to achieve this balance. The fact that oral P2Y inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor) have diverse pharmacodynamic profiles that affect clinical outcomes supports the rationale for using platelet function and genetic testing to individualize antiplatelet treatment regimens. Indeed, up to one-third of patients treated with clopidogrel, but a minority of those treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor, exhibit high residual platelet reactivity resulting in an increased thrombotic risk. On the other hand, prasugrel and ticagrelor are frequently associated with low platelet reactivity and increased bleeding risk compared with clopidogrel without providing any additional reduction in ischemic events compared with patients who adequately respond to clopidogrel. The use of platelet function and genetic testing may allow for a guided selection of oral P2Y inhibitors. However, the nonuniform results of randomized controlled trials have led guidelines to provide limited recommendations on the implementation of these tests in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. In light of recent advancements in the field, this consensus document by a panel of international experts fills in the guideline gap by providing updates on the latest evidence in the field as well as recommendations for clinical practice.
目前的证据表明,阿司匹林加 P2Y 抑制剂的双联抗血小板治疗对于预防经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的血栓事件至关重要。然而,双联抗血小板治疗与出血增加有关,这可能超过其益处。这为根据个体患者定制抗血小板治疗奠定了基础。然而,出血和缺血风险通常存在于同一患者中,因此很难实现这种平衡。口服 P2Y 抑制剂(氯吡格雷、普拉格雷和替格瑞洛)具有影响临床结局的不同药效学特征这一事实支持了使用血小板功能和基因检测来个体化抗血小板治疗方案的合理性。事实上,多达三分之一接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者,但接受普拉格雷或替格瑞洛治疗的患者中,存在较高的血小板反应性残留,导致血栓形成风险增加。另一方面,与氯吡格雷相比,普拉格雷和替格瑞洛与较低的血小板反应性和增加的出血风险相关,但与对氯吡格雷反应充分的患者相比,并未提供任何对缺血事件的额外减少。血小板功能和基因检测的使用可能允许对口服 P2Y 抑制剂进行有针对性的选择。然而,随机对照试验的非一致性结果导致指南对这些检测在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中的实施提供了有限的建议。鉴于该领域的最新进展,该国际专家组的共识文件通过提供该领域最新证据的更新以及对临床实践的建议,填补了指南空白。